Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-07T04:50:55.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Financial Development in Peru Under Agrarian Export Influence, 1884-1950*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Alfonso W. Quiroz*
Affiliation:
Baruch College, New York, New York

Extract

In the study of Latin America's economic history, discussion of the role of the export sector in promoting development has entered a provocative new stage. Recently, advances in the understanding of export economies have questioned the view that export orientation is the principal cause of underdevelopment and dependence. New studies have demonstrated the impact of export growth on the increasingly efficient use of domestic factors of production improvement of transportation networks, urban and industrial diversification, and active state intervention accompanied by the rising political influence of middle and labor sectors. Yet despite the perceived importance of domestic and foreign credit during the heyday of export-led growth, and the often underestimated but crucial native struggle to control and direct Latin American financial structures, few of those works have analyzed the crucial links between the economic structure and native financial development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research in Peru was possible thanks to an Advanced Grant for Research of the Social Science Research Council, 1987.

References

1 Conde, Roberto Cortés and Hunt, Shane, The Latin American Economies: Growth and the Export Sector 1880–1930 (New York, 1985).Google Scholar On the limitations of the dependency approach: Bergquist, Charles, Alternative Approaches to the Problem of Development: A Selected and Annotated Bibliography (Durham, 1979)Google Scholar; Weaver, Frederick S., “Neo-Classical Theory, Dependency Theory and the Staple Theory”, Occasional Papers Series No.7 (Amherst, 1977)Google Scholar; Klarén, Peter and Bossert, Thomas, Promise of Development: Theories of Change in Latin America (Boulder, 1986).Google Scholar

2 Coatsworth, John, Growth Against Development: The Economic Impact of Railroads in Porfirian Mexico (DeKalb, 1981).Google Scholar

3 Cariola, Carmen and Sunkel, OsvaldoThe Growth of the Nitrate Industry and Socioeconomic Change in Chile, 1880–1930” in Conde, Cortés and Hunt, , Latin American Economies, pp. 137254 Google Scholar; Weaver, Frederick S. Class, State, and Industrial Structure: The Historical Process of South American Industrial Growth (Westport, 1980).Google Scholar

4 Topik, Steven, The Political Economy of the Brazilian State (Austin, 1987)Google Scholar; Bergquist, Charles, Labor in Latin America (Stanford, 1986)Google Scholar. A compelling case for the weaknesses and limits of South American primary export capitalism in Albert, Bill, South America and the First World War: The impact of War on Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Chile (Cambridge, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Recent exceptions are Marichal, Carlos, Historia de la deuda externa de América Latina (Madrid, 1988)Google Scholar; and Drake, Paul, The Money Doctor in the Andes: The Kemmerer Missions, 1923–1933 (Durham, 1989)Google Scholar, who argues “control over credit proved as crucial a source of power as control over land,” p. 28.

6 Returned value is defined as the share of export receipts accounted for by local inputs and labor. See Thorp, Rosemary and Bertram, Geoffrey, Peru 1890–1977: Growth and Policy in an Open Economy (New York, 1978), pp. 40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 153. On coastal agricultural tradition in Peru, see Sutton, C.W.Agriculture and Irrigation in Peru,The West Coast Leader (Lima) (hereafter cited as WCL), 15:788 (22 Mar. 1927), 9.Google Scholar

7 Goldsmith, Raymond, Financial Structure and Development (New Haven, 1969)Google Scholar; McKinnon, Ronald, Money and Capital in Economic Development (Washington, 1973)Google Scholar; Leff, NathanielCapital Markets in the Less Developed Countries: The Group Principle” in McKinnon, Ronald ed., Money and Finance in Economic Growth and Development (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; and Reynolds, Clark W., “Flow of Funds: The Use of the Flow of Funds Analysis in the Study of Latin American Capital Market Development” in Organization of American States, Capital Markets Development Program, Documents and Summary Discussions, III Annual Meeting (Mexico, July 31-Aug. 2, 1973), pp. 5980.Google Scholar

8 Bonilla, Heraclio, Guano y burguesía en el Perú (Lima, 1974), pp. 165166 Google Scholar; Yepes, Ernesto Perú 1820–1920: un siglo de desarrollo capitalista (Lima, 1972), pp. 158159.Google Scholar

9 Camprubí, Carlos, Historia de los bancos en el Perú (1860–1879) (Lima, 1957)Google Scholar; Hunt, ShaneGrowth and Guano in Nineteenth Century Peru” inConde, Cortés and Hunt, , Latin American Economies, pp. 255318.Google Scholar

10 Quiroz, Alfonso, “Financial Institutions in Peruvian Export Economy and Society, 1884–1930” (Ph.D. dissertation: Columbia University, 1986), p. 40.Google Scholar

11 Miller, Rory, “The Making of the Grace Contract: British Bondholders and the Peruvian Government, 1885–1890,Journal of Latin American Studies 8 (1976), 73100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Harvey, Héctor, “El Banco Agrícola del Perú,La Vida Agrícola 13:152 (July 1936), 570.Google Scholar

13 Gonzales, Michael, Plantation Agriculture and Social Control in Northern Peru, 1875–1932 (Austin, 1985), pp. 27, 33–35Google Scholar; Klinge, Gerardo, “La agricultura en el Perú” in Marie, Darío Saint, ed., Perú en cifras: 1944–1945 (Lima, 1945), pp. 7375.Google Scholar

14 Michael Grace to A. Leslie, 17 April 1884, W.R. Grace & Co. Papers, Columbia University Library, New York, Box 58, No. 155, p. 292.

15 Klarén, Peter Modernization, Dislocation, and Aprismo: Origins of the Peruvian Aprista Party, 1870–1932 (Austin, 1973), pp. 512 Google Scholar. Mùtuo e hipoteca entries, escribano Carlos Sotomayor, Archivo General de la Nación, Lima, Nos. 777–783, years 1881–1889.

16 Aspíllaga, Antero Garland, Alejandro and Leguía, Augusto (Peru, Ministerio de Fomento), La crisis del azúcar: informe de la comisión oficial (Lima, 1902)Google Scholar; Gastón, José M. Ramírez Sociedades de crédito agrícola mutual (Lima, 1904)Google Scholar and Medio siglo de la política económica y financiera del Peni 1915–64 (Lima, 1964), 4–5; “El Banco Agrícola del Perú,” El Economista Peruano 3:36 (Feb. 1912), 420.

17 Payán, José La cuestión monetaria en el Perú (Lima, 1892)Google Scholar; Garland, Alejandro Sistema monetario del Perú (Lima, 1908)Google Scholar. On adverse effects of persistent silver currency policy in Mexico, see Zabludowski, Jaime E.Money, Foreign Indebtedness and Export Performance in Porfirist Mexico” (Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1984).Google Scholar

18 Meller, Ignacio Patrón de oro o bimetalismo: ensayo sobre aspectos nuevos de un problema antiguo (Lima, 1932).Google Scholar

19 Dubois, Luis Aspíllaga, Antero and Gildemeister, Juan Informe en mayoría de la comisión para el estudio de la depreciación en el valor de la moneda nacional de plata (Lima, 1892)Google Scholar; Correa, Pedro y Santiago, and Payan, José Informe en minoría … (Lima, 1892)Google Scholar. Also Banco del Callao, “Actas de reuniones del Directorio,” 30 Sept. 1892, Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros, Archivo del Banco del Perú y Londres en liquidación (hereafter cited as BPLS), vol. 2, no. 610, p. 251.

20 Godoy, Joaquín Revista de Cambios y Valores (Lima), 1890–1897Google Scholar. Bolsa Comercial de Lima, “Memoria Anual,” Boletín de la Bolsa Comercial (Lima), 1900–1914.

21 First Law of Insurance Companies, arts. 4 and 5 in El Economista 1:16 (Dec. 1895); Inspección de Seguros, Fiscal de Compañías Memoria del director en 1902 (Lima, 1903), pp. 116119 Google Scholar. Native insurance companies continued, however, to re-insure with companies abroad.

22 Quiroz, “Financial Institutions,” p. 50.

23 A comparison between the Banco del Perú y Londres and the Banco Nacional de México, leading institutions in their respective countries in the 1884-1910 period, yield common characteristics: high concentration of banking activities, foreign participation and state connections. The Mexican bank had more regional linkages and enjoyed note-issue privileges which the Peruvian institution lacked, Ludlow, Leonor and Marichal, Carlos eds., Banca y poder en México, 1800–1925 (Mexico, 1986), p. 258.Google Scholar

24 Banco del Perú y Londres (hereafter BPyL), “Actas de Juntas de Accionistas,” 26 Dec. 1906 and 18 Mar. 1907, BPLS, vol. 2, pp. 58–62.

25 BPyL, “Directorio,” 14 Mar. 1912, BPLS, vol. 6, no. 863, pp. 172–174; ibid., 18 Apr. 1912, no. 868, p. 198.

26 BPyL, “Directorio,” 14 Oct. 1904, BPLS, vol. 3, no. 385, pp. 220–221 ; Yepes, , Peru 1820–1920, 150 Google Scholar, 178; Alzamora, IsaacMemoria del Presidente de la Empresa Socavonera del Cerro de Pasco,La Gaceta Comercial (Lima), 6:127 (1906), 1213.Google Scholar

27 Quiroz, AlfonsoFinancial Leadership and the Formation of Peruvian Elite Groups, 1884–1930,Journal of Latin American Studies 20:1 (1988), 4981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Several issues of the monthly Peru Today (1909–1914) and the weekly West Coast Leader (1913–1940); contemporary guides and biographies: Parker, William ed., Peruvians of Today (Lima, 1919)Google Scholar; Soldán, Juan Pedro Paz Diccionario biográfico de peruanos contemporáneos (Lima, 1917)Google Scholar; Informaciones Mercantiles e Industriales, El Perú en su centenario (Lima, 1921).

29 Reaño, Germán and Vásquez, Enrique El Grupo Romero: del algodón a la banca (Lima, 1988)Google Scholar; Suárez, Felipe PortocarreroEl Imperio Prado (1890–1970): orígenes, auge y decadencia de un grupo económico familiar” (M.A. thesis, Universidad Católica, 1986).Google Scholar

30 Bolsa Comercial de Lima, , Memoria, 1900–1930.Google Scholar

31 Perù, Cámara de Diputados, Dictamen de la comisión parlamentaria investigadora de la Compañía Recaudadora de Impuestos (Lima, 1921); Quiroz, , “Financial Institutions,” p. 58.Google Scholar

32 Beneficencia Pública de Lima, Memoria de las operaciones de la Caja de Ahorros (Lima, 1909–1929); Mayer, DoraMoralidad en los negocios,La Gaceta Comercial 6:123 (Aug. 1906), 1155 Google Scholar; Camprubí, Carlos Un siglo al servicio del ahorro: 1868–1968 (Lima, 1968), pp. 8688.Google Scholar

33 Inspección de Casas de Préstamo, “Relación de las casas de préstamo que actualemente existen en la capital,” Boletín Municipal (Lima), 1st semester 1901, pp. 37, 69; “Parte mensual,” ibid., 1889–1913. Olivares, Presbítero Rubén L. El negocio del dinero y la usura (Lima, 1923).Google Scholar

34 Harvey, , “Banco Agrícola,566567.Google Scholar

35 Banco del Perú y Londres en liquidación, “Registro de créditos inscritos por oficinas” and “Registro de créditos no inscritos por oficinas,” May 1931, BPLS.

36 Mallon, Florencia The Defense of Community in Peru’s Central Highlands: Peasant Struggle and Capitalist Transition, 1860–1940 (Princeton, 1983), p. 273 Google Scholar; Roberts, BryanThe Social History of a Provincial Town: Huancayo, 1890–1972” in Miller, Rory ed., Social and Economic Change in Modern Peru (Liverpool, 1976), p. 155 Google Scholar; Herrera, José Tamayo Historia social del Cuzco republicano (Lima, 1981), p. 130.Google Scholar

37 French and British shareholders of the BPyL declined from seventy-three percent of total shares in 1913 to thirty-four percent in 1921, “Accionistas,” 1913–1921, BPLS. The agro-industrial complexes of Santa Bárbara, Puente Piedra, Paramonga, and San Nicolás were either taken over or substantially capitalized by natives during 1917–1921, Informaciones Mercantiles, El Perú; Albert, Bill An Essay on the Peruvian Sugar Industry 1880–1930 (Norwich, 1976), 140aGoogle Scholar; Basadre, Jorge Historia de la Republic del Perú, 16 vols. (Lima, 1968), IX, 300.Google Scholar

38 Thorp and Bertram, Peru, chap. 5; Dore, Elizabeth The Peruvian Mining Industry: Growth, Stagnation, and Crisis (Boulder, 1988)Google Scholar, chap. 4.

39 Monopolies included those on guano, salt, alcohol, match and tobacco, Giesecke, Albert, “Recent Financial Reforms in Peru,” WCL 18:936 (21 Jan. 1930), 7 Google Scholar; Revista Universitaria (April 1928), 582–675.

40 Leguía, Augusto [?], El Oncenio y la Lima actual: memorias completas del Presidente Leguía “Yo tirano, yo ladrón” (Lima, 1936)Google Scholar; López, René Hooper Leguía: ensayo biográfico (Lima, 1964)Google Scholar; biased criticisms of Leguía’s policies in Ugarteche, Pedro La política internacional peruana durante la dicta-dura de Leguía (Lima, 1930)Google Scholar and Gastón, Ramírez Medio siglo, p. 39 Google Scholar; Drake, , Money Doctor, pp. 216217.Google Scholar

41 Dejean de la Batie to Ministre des Affaires Etrangères, 6 April 1922, Archive du Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances, Paris, B32-896; Poindexter to Secretary of State, 29 June 1925, U.S. Department of State, U.S. National Archives (hereafter USNA), Washington, D.C., microcopy 746, roll No. 22, 823.526/46.

42 President of the National City Bank to Andrew W. Mellon, 1 June 1921, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Box 162, File No. I, USNA; U.S. Department of State, Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1921 (Washington, 1936), II, pp. 663–666.

43 de Depósitos, Caja y Consignaciones, , Memoria, no. 39 (Lima: Gil, 1925)Google Scholar; Banco de Reserva del Perú, Memoria, 1922–1930; BPyL, “Directorio,” 1921–1928.

44 Testimony of Lawrence Dennis: U.S. Senate, Finance Committee Hearings, 72nd Congress, 1st Session, Sale of Foreign Bonds or Securities in the United States (Washington, D.C., 1932), I, p. 1587; Gastón, Ramírez Medio siglo, pp. 2941.Google Scholar

45 “Interview with President Leguía” by John Clayton, WCL, 16:842 (3 April 1927), 22; Stallings, Barbara Banker to the Third World: U.S. Portfolio Investment in Latin America, 1900–1986 (Berkeley, 1987).Google Scholar

46 Wilson, FionaThe Conflict between Indigenous and Immigrant Commercial Systems in the Peruvian Central Sierra, 1900–1940” in Miller, Rory Region and Class, p. 127.Google Scholar

47 Klinge, GerardoPolitica de Irrigación,La Vida Agricola, 13:137 (Aprii 1935), 262.Google Scholar

48 de Reserva, Banco, Memoria, 1922–1930.Google Scholar

49 “Peruvian Business Depression” (based on cable from U.S. Commercial Attaché, L. W. James), WCL, 15:777 (4 Jan. 1927), 24; Thorp, Rosemary and Londoño, CarlosThe Effect of the Great Depression on the Economies of Peru and Colombia” in Thorp, R. ed., Latin America in the 1930s: The Role of the Periphery in World Crisis (Hong Kong, 1984), pp. 81111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 “Manifesto to the Nation,” WCL, 18:967 (26 Aug. 1930), 1, 16–17; “Sentence of the Tribunal of National Sanction (Second Court) Against Ex-President Augusto B. Leguía and His Son,”WCL, 19:987 (13 Jan. 1931), 6.

51 “Tribute to President Leguía,” WCL, 17:896 (16 April 1929), 1; Banquete presidencial al Presidente de la República (Lima, 1929).

52 “Political Conspiracies,” WCL, 18:950 (29 Aprii 1930), 1; “New Directorate of the National Agrarian Society,” ibid., 954:27 (May 1930); Thorp, and Bertram, , Peru, p. 401 Google Scholar, note 2. Years later Klinge explained that the conflict was unleashed by the 1924 Olmos irrigation project, which had limited the water supply of large sugar planters in Lambayeque, among them Piedra, so as to irrigate lands that had been newly colonized by small landholders, “Política de irrigación,” La Vida Agrícola, 12:137 (1935), 245–269; “Importante problema de colonización en Lambayeque,” ibid., 12:140 (1935), 521–524.

53 “Project of Currency Stabilization,” WCL, 18:939 (11 Feb. 1930), 11; “Sun Life [Assurance Co.] May Suspend New Business,” ibid.; 18:946 (1 April 1930), 1. Nominally 1 U.S. dollar = 3.57 soles. However, the dollar quoted freely over four soles.

54 Gubbins, Reginald, “Steps Toward Normalization of Peruvian Finances,” WCL, 18:939 (4 Feb. 1930), xix.Google Scholar

55 “Peru’s Credit Position defined by Institute of International Finance – Peru Will Adopt Gold Standard When Free Convertibility of Notes Can Be Maintained,” WCL, 18:954 (27 May 1930), 3.

56 WCL, 18:965 (12 Aug. 1930), 1.

57 WCL, 18:967 (26 Aug. 1930), 16.

58 “Arrival of Kemmerer Mission,” WCL, 19:987 (13 Jan. 1931), 1; “Kemmerer Mission Completes Work,” ibid., 19:1001 (21 April 1931), 1; Amis, Oscar La estabilización de nuestra moneda (Lima, 1931)Google Scholar; Drake, , Money Doctor, p. 34.Google Scholar

59 WCL, 19:1002 (28 April 1931), ii. The gold value of the Peruvian sol was lowered; instead of being equivalent to US$ 0.40 it was nominally fixed at USS 0.28 (0.421254 fine gold gram). However, the sol was quoted freely below that limit until it stabilized at 6.50 soles = US$ I.

60 “Extension of credit accompanied by a prudent increase of existing circulation would be an effective means of solving the present economic crisis of Peru,” statement in Arequipa by A. Martinelli, Minister of Finance under President David Samanez, WCL, 20:1045 (16 Feb 1932), 7. Internal loans started in May 1931, when sugar planter Rafael Larco Herrera was Minister of Finance and Manuel Olaechea President of the Banco Central de Reserva: WCL, 19:1006 (26 May 1931), 1; “Customs vales,” ibid., 19:1053 (9 April 1932), 1.

61 de Reserva del Perú, Banco, Legislación (Lima, 1944), 5, p. 7.Google Scholar Drake finds this a common trait in Kemmerer’s advisory services to Andean governments, Money Doctor, pp. 28, 42–43.

62 “Law Creating Superintendence of Banks,” WCL, 19:993 (24 Feb. 1931), 1; “Liquidation of the Banco del Perú y Londres,” ibid., 19. In May 1931 the Caja Nacional de Ahorros, created by Leguía in 1929, was also liquidated. See also Superintendencia de Bancos, Memoria, (1931) and Banco del Perú y Londres en liquidación: memoria anual (Lima, 1931).

63 Complaints about the lost opportunities for “economic progress” after the liquidation of the Perú y Londres bank in Urquiaga, Carlos Algunas notas sobre las concentraciones bancarias y el proyecto para la formación del Banco del Estado (Lima, 1933), p. 4.Google Scholar

64 “Sociedad Nacional Agraria,” WCL, 18:974 (14 Oct. 1930), 19; “El problema azucarero,” La Vida Agrícola, 14:158 (1937), 35–38.

65 “Proposed Moratorium on Mortgage Loans,” WCL, 20:1051 (5 April 1932), 2. “Obligations Contracted in Foreign Money. Lima Chamber of Commerce Voices its Protest Against Recent Legislation,” WCL, 20:1071 (23 Aug. 1932), 4.

66 “Peruvian National Loans: Service Suspended by Supreme Decree,” WCL, 19:997 (24 March 1931), 1.

67 “El cambio,” La Vida Agrícola, 13:146 (Jan. 1936), 21–24.

68 WCL, 19:1018 (18 Aug. 1931), 1; ibid., 19:1027 (20 Oct. 1931), 1. An important agriculturist on the board of the new Banco Central de Reserva was Vice President Pedro G. Beltrán; Banco Central de Reserva, Boletín mensual, 1:1 (Sept. 1931).

69 “Farmer’s Bank of Peru,” WCL, 21:1092 (17 Jan. 1933), 25: “El Banco Agrícola y la Superintendencia de Bancos,” La Vida Agrícola, 12:139 (1935), 439–441 and 12:144 (1935), 915–918.

70 Small farmers received as much as 12.8% in 1944. No credit was granted to them between 1931 and 1933, Marie, Saint Perú en cifras, pp. 104111 Google Scholar; “Crédito agrícola: crédito para el pequeño agricultor,” La Vida Agrícola, 12:138 (1935), 343–346; “Memoria del Banco Agrícola del Perú,” ibid., 14:170 (1938), 95–100.

71 Marie, Saint Perú en cifras, p. 111 Google Scholar; “La labor del Banco de Fomento Agropecuario del Perú,” La Crónica, 31 May 1959, 10–11.

72 “Policy of Central Reserve Bank of Peru,” WCL, 22:1172 (31 July 1934), 20–21, and “Monetary Policy of the Central Bank,” 22:1191 (11 Dec. 1934), 7; Gonzalo, Portocarrero M., De Bustamante a Odría: el fracaso del Frente Democrático Nacional, 1945–1950 (Lima, 1983), p. 3738.Google Scholar

73 Emilio Romero, “La evolución económica del Perú” in Marie, Saint Perú en cifras, pp. 1722 Google Scholar; WCL, 21:1121 (8 Aug. 1933), 1.

74 Comedores Populares, Workers’ Social Insurance and housing projects.

75 Werlich, David Peru: A Short History (Carbondale, 1978), pp. 158 Google Scholar, 213; Gerbi, Antonello El Perú en marcha: ensayo de geografía econòmica (Lima, 1941).Google Scholar

76 WCL, 22:1144 (16 Jan. 1934), xii; ibid., 24:1265 (12 May 1936), 7.

77 Banco Industriai del Perú, Veinte años de vida del Banco Industrial del Perú 1936–1956 (Lima, 1956); Peru, Ministerio de Hacienda, “Memoria del Banco Minero del Perú correspondiente al año 1943,” Revista de Hacienda, no. 18 (1944). This bank had repeated annual losses which were covered by tax revenues.

78 “Memoria del Banco Industrial del Perú correspondiente al año 1944” in Memoria del Ministro de Hacienda, (Lima, 1945), II.

79 Beltroy, Manuel Peruanos notables de hoy (Lima, 1957).Google Scholar

80 “Los agricultores y la política,” La Vida Agricola, 13:150 (1936), 385–386; Portocarrero, M., De Bustamante, pp. 28, 85–87.Google Scholar

81 Ibid., 22, 40; WCL, 23:1245 (24 Dec. 1935), 1.

82 On Italian political and financial connections in Peru see Cicarelli, OrazioFascist Propaganda and the Italian Community in Peru during the Benavides Regime, 1933–1939,Journal of Latin American Studies, 20 (1988), 361388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83 “Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Banco Italiano,” WCL, 20:1046 (1 May 1932), 4; "45th Annual Report of the Banco Italiano," WCL, 21:1098 (7 March 1933), 21.

84 Superintendencia, , Memoria (1934–1940) and Situación de las empresas bancarias del Perú (Lima, 1931–1945)Google Scholar; Portacarrero, M., De Bustamante, p. 21.Google Scholar

85 Banco Central de Reserva, Boletín mensual, 1934–1939.

86 Marie, Saint Perú en cifras, pp. 112120 Google Scholar, 258–259. The Amazonas Corporation exploited rubber during World War II. The Santa Corporation was a hydroelectric and iron industrial complex in the province of Ancash, , “Memoria de la Corporación Peruana del Santa,Revista de Hacienda, 26 (1946), 451.Google Scholar

87 Portocarrero, M., De Bustamante, p. 33.Google Scholar

88 Bardella, Gianfranco Un siglo en la vida economica del Perú, 1889–1989 (Lima, 1989), pp. 327, 338–344.Google Scholar

89 Ferrero, Rómulo La politica fiscal y la economía nacional (Lima, 1946), p. 51.Google Scholar

90 Alberto Arca Parró, “Perú en cifras” in Marie, Saint Perú en cifras, pp. 49 Google Scholar, 53–54; Ferrero, RómuloEl comercio en el Perú,ibid., 342343 Google Scholar; “Memoria del Banco Industrial del Perú” in Memoria del Ministro de Hacienda 1940 (Lima, 1941), 755; “La inflación puede considerarse como un ahorro forzado…” according to Rómulo Ferrero, first Minister of Finance under Bustamente, José L. Memoria del Ministro de Hacienda (Lima, 1946) I, p. 245.Google Scholar

91 “El Banco Industrial y la agricultura,” La Vida Agrícola, 13:157 (Dec. 1936), 935–938; Portocarrero, M., De Bustamante, pp. 4345 Google Scholar; criticism of the industrialization strategy of high profits, self-finance and financial repression in Garrido-Lecca, Guillermo and O’Mara, Gerald T. The Urban Informal Credit Market in a Developing Country Under Financial Repression: The Peruvian Case (Austin, 1974), pp. 4849.Google Scholar

92 Jelicic, JorgeLa Memoria del Banco de Reserva y la situación econòmica del Perú,Mercurio Peruano. 242 (1947), 254268.Google Scholar

93 Felipe, Portocarrero S., Beltrán, Arlette and Zimmerman, Alex Inversiones públicas en el Perú (1900–1968): una aproximación cuantitativa (Lima, 1988), pp. 3233.Google Scholar

94 “Peruvian Economy. Quarterly Report on the Economic Situation of Peru as of March 31, 1954,” (issued by the Banco Continental) Peruvian Times (Lima), 7 May 1954, p. 6; Collier, David Squatters and Oligarchs: Authoritarian Rule and Policy Change in Peru (Baltimore, 1976).Google Scholar

95 “Almuerzo a Odría,” Boletín de la Sociedad Nacional Agraria, 5:202 (1953), 3–8; Cámara Algodonera del Perú, Memoria correspondiente al año 1951 (Lima, 1952).

96 Thorp, and Bertram, , Peru, pp. 211, 245Google Scholar; Roemer, Michael, Fishing for Growth: Export-Led Development in Peru, 1950–1967 (Cambridge, Mass., 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97 Ordóñez, Mario B., La técnica y la práctica en la banca peruana (Lima, 1963)Google Scholar; Zender, Ignacio Basombrío, Bancos: elementos para un debate (Lima, 1979)Google Scholar; Cucchiarelli, Paolo, “Futuro de la banca privada frente al crecimiento de la banca asociada” (Lima, 1973)Google Scholar; Superintencia, , Memoria, 1968–1988.Google Scholar

98 La Prensa, 53:24615 (1956), xvi–xviii. The idea was promoted by Enrique Pardo Heeren in 1950. First directors were: Feliciano del Campo, Calixto Romero (cotton producer of Piura), Manuel Izaga Perez and Gustavo Apíllaga Anderson (sugar planters of the north), Eduardo López de Romaña (Arequipa), Carlos Díaz Ufano (industry), George Bertie (Duncan Fox & Co.), Percival Sears (Anderson Clayton & Co.) and Carlos Suter (importer), ibid., pp. xiv–xv.

99 Bertram, GeoffreyModernización y cambio en la industria lanera del Perú, 1919–1930: un caso frustrado de desarrollo,Apuntes 6 (1977), 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar