Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:26:27.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

California Indian Reactions to the Franciscans*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Florence C. Shipek
Florence C. Shipek*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Kenosha, Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The entrance of the Spanish into California and the founding of the Franciscan mission system has been described in many books both by those sympathetic apologists for the missions and the Spanish as bringing “civilization” to barbarous rude savages lacking any knowledge of God (Englehardt 1912, and others) and by those who disapproved of the mission system but approved of the Spanish conquest of California (Bancroft 1884, 1886, and others). The Indian cultures which were destroyed by the Spanish and later American settlers have also been described many times, first by those who unquestioningly accepted the Spanish view of these people as simply taking what nature produced. This viewpoint gives justification to the conquerors because “they could use the land better.” More recently a number of researchers have been reading the Spanish descriptions of what they actually saw and have ignored the Spanish assumptions, but read the descriptions of the environment with the ecological knowledge necessary to recognize the existence of a man-made environment, not a “natural” environment. They have discovered evidence of complex hierarchical stratified social Systems which were ignored because the Spanish assumed they were not present (Kehoe 1981, Shipek 1981a). Others interviewed surviving Indians and have explored areas of Indian knowledge never explored before simply because it was assumed that they had no such knowledge. For example, it has been discovered that all groups had the knowledge of and worshipped a high creator God whose name was so sacred that it must not be mentioned except in the proper sacred areas and during the sacred ceremonies dedicated to the Creator.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Americas , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , April 1985 , pp. 480 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Some of this paper is based upon interviews with elderly Kumeyaay, also known as Diegueño-Kamia, and San Luiseño concerning the stories told to them by grandparents and great-grandparents about ancestors' initial reaction to and experience with the missions and the Spanish.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bancroft, Hubert Howe, The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Vol. 18, History of California Vol. 1, 1884. Vol. 19, History of California Vol. 2, 1886. Reprinted by McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York and Toronto.Google Scholar
Bean, Lowell J., 1972 Mukat’s People. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bean, Lowell J. 1974 Social Organization in Native California, pp. 11–34 in ’Antap: California Indian Political and Economic Organization. Edited by Bean, L.J. and King, T.F.. Menlo Park, Ca. Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Bean, Lowell J., and Lawton, Harry W. 1973 Some Explanations for the Rise of Cultural Complexity in Native California with Comments on Proto-agriculture and Agriculture, pp. v-xi, Introduction to Lewis, Henry T.: Patterns of Indian Burning in California Ecology and Ethnohistory. Menlo Park, Ca. Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Thomas, 1974 Ceremonial Integration and Social Interaction in Aboriginal California, pp. 93–110 in ’Antap: California Indian Political and Economic Organization. Eds. Bean, L.J., and King, T. J.. Menlo Park: Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Boscana, Fr. Geronimo, 1933 Chinigchinich in Chinigchinich, a revised and annotated version of Alfred Robinson’s translation of father Geronimo Boscana’s Historical Account of the beliefs, usages, customs and extravagancies of the Indians of the Mission of San Juan Capistrano called the Acagchemen tribe. Edited by Hanna, P.T.. Santa Ana: Fine Arts Press.Google Scholar
Cook, S.F., 1976 The Conflict Between the California Indian and White Civilization. Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M., 1912 The Missions and Missionaries of California, Vol. 2: Upper California: Part 1: General History. San Francisco James H. Barry Co.Google Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M. 1920 The Missions and Missionaries of California, New Series: Local History: San Diego Mission. San Francisco: James H. Barry Co.Google Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M. 1927 New Series: Local History: San Gabriel Mission.Google Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M. 1929 New Series; Local History: San Miguel, Archangel: The Mission on the Highway. Reprinted. Ramona, Ca.: Acoma Books. 1971Google Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M. 1929aNew Series: Local History: San Antonio de Padua: The Mission in the Sierras. Reprint ed. Ramona Ca.: Ballena Press 1972.Google Scholar
Englehardt, Fr. Zephyrin O.F.M. 1934 New Series: Local History: Mission San Carlos Borromeo. The Father of the Missions. Reprint Ed. Ramona, Ca. Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, Maynard O.F.M., trans, and ed. 1970 Letter of Luis Jayme, O.F.M. San Diego, October 17, 1772. Los Angeles, Ca. Dawson’s Book Shop.Google Scholar
Guest, Francis O.F.M., 1983 Cultural Perspectives on California Mission Life. Southern California Quarterly. Vol 65, No. 1.Google Scholar
Hanke, Lewis, 1959 Aristotle and The American Indian: A Study in Race Prejudice in the Modern World. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Alice B., 1981 Revisionist Anthropology: Aboriginal North America. In Current Anthropology 22:5(503–517).Google Scholar
Rudkin, Charles, trans, and ed. 1956 Observations on California 1772–1790 by Father Luis Sales O.P., Los Angeles: Dawson’s Book Shop.Google Scholar
Shipek, Florence C., 1977 A Strategy for Change: The Luiseño of Southern California Ph.D. Dissertation University of Hawaii (Univ. Microfilms). Google Scholar
Shipek, Florence C. 1981 A Native American Adaptation to Drought: The Kumeyaay as seen in the San Diego Mission records 1770–1798. Ethnohistory 28:4 (295–312).Google Scholar
Shipek, Florence C. 1981a Comments on Kehoe: Revisionist Anthropology. Current Anthropology 22:5 (514).Google Scholar
Shipek, Florence C. 1982 Kumeyaay Socio-Political Structure. Journal of California and Great Basic Anthropology 4:2 (296–303).Google Scholar
Tac, Pablo, 1958 Indian Life and Custom at Mission San Luis Rey. A Record of California Mission Life written by Pablo Tac, an Indian Neophyte about 1835. ed and trans, by Gordon, and Minna, Hewes. Old Mission San Luis Rey, Oceanside, Ca.Google Scholar
Weber, Francis J., The Pride of the Missions: A Documentary History of San Gabriel Mission. Hongkong, Libra Press.Google Scholar