Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:03:30.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to Ordeshook and Rae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William H. Riker
William H. Riker*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 456 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ordeshook, Peter C. (1980). “Political Disequilibrium and Scientific Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 74:447–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas (1980). “An Altimeter for Mr. Escher's Stairway.” American Political Science Review 74: 451–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. (1977). “The Future of a Science in Politics.” American Behavioral Scientist 21: 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. (forthcoming, 1980). Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.