Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T05:48:08.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and the Environment: Nonlinear Instabilities Dominate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Courtney Brown
Courtney Brown
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis investigates a formal nonlinear systems model characterizing longitudinal change in the environment as a function of oscillating partisan control of the White House. It is assumed that one political party will tend to favor help for the environment despite some economic costs, whereas the other party will generally favor economic growth over environmental concerns. These policy changes affect the environment interactively with both public concern for particular environmental problems and the economic costs relating to environmental repair. This interaction with policy changes causes a disruption in the continuously evolving balance between the social factors that damage the environment and the environment's own ability to recover. The disruptive potential to the environment is considerably ameliorated with a reduction in the electoral cycling.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 292 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Paul Allen. 1974. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demographic County Characteristics on Party Behavior.” American Political Science Review 68:1229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Courtney. 1991. Ballots of Tumult: A Portrait of Volatility in American Voting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmstadter, Joel. 1991. The Economic Cost of CO2 Mitigation: A Review of Estimates for Selected World Regions. Discussion Paper ENR91–06. Washington: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Energy Modeling Forum. 1992. Global Climate Change: Energy Sector Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emission Control Strategies. Report No. 12. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hamming, Richard W. 1973. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. 2d ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard A., and Milkis, Sidney M.. 1989. The Politics of Regulatory Change: A Tale of Two Agencies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr., 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeco-nomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71:1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, R. Robert. 1983. “The Social Context of Political Change: Durability, Volatility, and Social Influence.” American Political Science Review 77:929–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocak, Huseyin. 1989. Differential and Difference Equations through Computer Experiments. 2d ed.New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael Bruce. 1981. “Social Communication and the Mass Policy Agenda.” In More Than News, by MacKuen, Michael Bruce and Coombs, Steven Lane. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
May, Robert M. 1974. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mesterton-Gibbons, Michael. 1989. A Concrete Approach to Mathematical Modeling. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Moulton, Robert J., and Richards, Kenneth R.. 1990. Costs of Sequestering Carbon through Tree Planting and Forest Management in the United States. General Technical Report WO-58. Washington: Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 1991a. “Economic Approaches to Greenhouse Warming.” In Global Warming, ed. Dornbusch, Rudiger and Poterba, James M.. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 1991b. “The Cost of Slowing Climate Change: A Survey.” Energy Journal 12:37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, James M. 1991. “Tax Policy To Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax.” In Global Warming, ed. Dornbusch, Rudiger and Poterba, James M.. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Soares, Glaucio A. D.. 1971. “Theories in Search of a Curve: A Contextual Interpretation of Left Vote.” American Political Science Review 65:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lewis F. 1960. Arms and Insecurity: A Mathematical Study of the Causes and Origins of War. Pittsburgh: Boxwood.Google Scholar
Rowland, C. K., Lee, S. C., and Goetze, D. B.. 1990. “Longitudinal and Catastrophic Models of State Hazardous Waste Regulation.” In Economics, Institutions, and Public Policy, ed. Gildson, Allen and Dubnick, Melvin. Greenwood, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1992. “Some Economics of Global Warming.” American Economic Review 82:1–14.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1981. “One-Party Dominance in Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6:259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Tobin, Richard. 1990. The Expendable Future: U.S. Politics and the Protection of Biological Diversity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Vig, Norman J., and Kraft, Michael E.. 1984. Environmental Policy in the 1980's: Reagan's New Agenda. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael Don. 1984. “Differential Paths to Parity: A Study of the Contemporary Arms Race.” American Political Science Review 78:297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, Richard W. 1989. Presidential Influence and the Administrative State. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Wood, B. Dan. 1988. “Principals, Bureaucrats, and Responsiveness in Clean Air Enforcements.” American Political Science Review 82:213–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, B. Dan, and Waterman, Richard W.. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 85:801–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.