Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:26:12.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Robert Huckfeldt  and
John Sprague
Robert Huckfeldt
Affiliation:
Indiana University
John Sprague
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As agents of electoral mobilization, political parties occupy an important role in the social flow of political communication. We address several questions regarding party mobilization efforts. Whom do the parties seek to mobilize? What are the individual and aggregate characteristics and criteria that shape party mobilization efforts? What are the intended and unintended consequences of partisan mobilization, both for individual voters and for the electorate more generally? In answering these questions we make several arguments. First, party efforts at electoral mobilization inevitably depend upon a process of social diffusion and informal persuasion, so that the party canvass serves as a catalyst aimed at stimulating a cascading mobilization process. Second, party mobilization is best seen as being environmentally contingent upon institutional arrangements, locally defined strategic constraints, and partisan divisions within particular electorates. Finally, the efforts of party organizations generate a layer of political structure within the electorate that sometimes competes with social structure and often exists independently from it.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 70 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Paul Allen. 1974. “Environment and Party: The Impact of Political and Demographic County Characteristics on Party Behavior.” American Political Science Review 68:1229–44.10.2307/1959159Google Scholar
Bibby, John F., Cotter, Cornelius P., Gibson, James L., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1983. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States, ed. Gray, Virginia, Jacob, Herbert, and Vines, Kenneth N.. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Welch, Susan. 1987. “Patterns of Political Party Activity among U.S. Cities.” Urban Affairs Quarterly 23:249–69.10.1177/004208168702300205Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1986. Theories of Social Change: A Critical Appraisal. Trans. Whitehouse, J. C.. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1987. “Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology 92:1287–1335.10.1086/228667Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., Clausen, Aage R., and Patterson, Samuel C.. 1990. “Partisan Mobilization and Electoral Participation.” Electoral Studies 9:191–204.10.1016/0261-3794(90)90025-4Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., Patterson, Samuel C., and Markko, Gregory A.. 1985. “The Mobilization of Voters in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47:490–509.10.2307/2130893Google Scholar
Crotty, William J. 1971. “Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote.” American Political Science Review 65:439–50.10.2307/1954460Google Scholar
Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “Measuring the Impact of Local Party Activity on the General Election Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27:372–86.10.1086/267182Google Scholar
Cutright, Phillips, and Rossi, Peter H.. 1958. “Grass Roots Politicians and the Vote.” American Sociological Review 23: 171–79.10.2307/2089001Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1986. Politics, Self, and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farquharson, Robin. 1969. Theory of Voting. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Scarrow, Howard A.. 1985. “Party Identification and Party Enrollment: The Difference and Consequence.” Journal of Politics 47:620–42.10.2307/2130899Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E.. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77:957–73.10.2307/1957569Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1983. “Assessing Party Organizational Strength.” American Journal of Political Science 27:193–222.10.2307/2111015Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1985. “Whither the Local Parties? A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of the Strength of Party Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science 29:139–60.10.2307/2111216Google Scholar
Gosnell, Harold. 1927. Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Robert M. 1974. “Contextual Analysis Revisited.” Sociological Methods and Research 2:365–75.10.1177/004912417400200305Google Scholar
Hawley, Willis D. 1973. Nonpartisan Elections and the Case for Party Politics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, Richard C. 1973. “Interparty Competition and Electoral Turnout: The Case of Indiana.” American Journal of Political Science 17:351–66.10.2307/2110524Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81:1197–1216.10.2307/1962585Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1991. “Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence.” Journal of Politics 53:122–58.10.2307/2131724Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm. 1984. Parties and Primaries: Nominating State Governors. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm, and Olson, David. 1982. Political Parties and Elections in American States. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W.. 1981. “The Con-sequences of Validated and Self-Reported Voting Measures.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45:519–35.10.1086/268685Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel, and Eldersveld, Samuel J.. 1961. “The Impact of Local Party Activities upon the Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 25:1–24.10.1086/266993Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O., and Munger, Frank. 1959. “Social Determinism and Electoral Decision: The Case of Indiana.” In American Voting Behavior, ed. Burdick, Eugene and Brod-beck, Arthur J.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald. 1970–1971. “The Effects of Precinct-level Canvassing on Voter Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 560–72.10.1086/267841Google Scholar
Krassa, Michael A. 1985. “Contextually Conditioned Political Interactions: Party Activity and Mass Behavior Response.” Ph.D. diss., Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Krassa, Michael A. 1988. “Context and the Canvass: The Mechanisms of Interactions.” Political Behavior 10:233–46.10.1007/BF00990553Google Scholar
Krassa, Michael A. 1989. “Getting Out the Black Vote: The Party Canvass and the Black Response.” In New Perspectives in American Politics, ed. Barker, Lucius (special issue). National Political Science Review 1.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400854523Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1956. “One-Party Politics and the Voter.” American Political Science Review 50:707–25.10.2307/1951554Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Determinants of Coattail Voting.” Political Behavior 12:265–88.10.1007/BF00992336Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77:675–89.10.2307/1957267Google Scholar
Pimlott, Ben. 1972. “Does Local Party Organization Matter?” British Journal of Political Science 2:381–83.10.1017/S0007123400008735Google Scholar
Pimlott, Ben. 1973. “Local Party Organization, Turnout, and Marginality.” British Journal of Political Science 3:252–55.10.1017/S0007123400007845Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1966. “Political Attitudes and the Local Community.” American Political Science Review 60:640–54.10.2307/1952976Google Scholar
Segal, David R., and Meyer, Marshall W.. 1974. “The Social Context of Political Partisanship.” In Social Ecology, edited Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E. 1983. Quiet Revolution: The Struggle for the Democratic Party and the Shaping of Post-Reform Politics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E. 1988. Bifurcated Politics: Evolution and Reform in the National Party Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674421622Google Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J., and Beck, Paul Allen. 1987. Party Politics in America. 6th ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Sprague, John. 1976. “Estimating a Boudon Type Contextual Model: Some Practical and Theoretical Problems of Measurement.” Political Methodology 3:333–53.Google Scholar
Stabrowski, Donald J. 1984. “A Political Machine, an Ethnic Community, and South Bend's West Side: 1900–1980.” Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1963. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. Trans. Hammarling, Vilgot. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P.. 1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43:359–77.10.1086/268527Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond. 1963. “The Influence of Precinct Work on Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27:387–98.10.1086/267183Google Scholar