Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-03T20:15:49.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Policy Impact and Voter Mobilization: Evidence from Farmers’ Trade War Experiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2024

JAKE ALTON JARES*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, United States
NEIL MALHOTRA*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, United States
*
Corresponding author: Neil Malhotra, Edith M. Cornell Professor of Political Economy, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, United States, neilm@stanford.edu.
Jake Alton Jares, PhD Candidate in Political Economy, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, United States, jjares@stanford.edu.

Abstract

How does the extent of policy benefits—not simply their presence—affect political engagement? While fundamental to understanding the electoral implications of economic policymaking, addressing this question is challenging due to the difficulty of measuring individual voters’ policy outcomes. We examine a natural experiment embedded in President Trump’s Market Facilitation Program (MFP), which aided a core Republican constituency: farmers harmed by his 2018 trade war. Due to idiosyncrasies of program design, the MFP undercompensated some farmers for their trade war losses—and significantly overcompensated others—based solely on their 2018 crop portfolios. Analyzing over 165,000 affected voters, we show that improved compensation outcomes had negligible impacts on Republican farmers’ midterm turnout and campaign contributions, even though such variation in benefits significantly affected farmers’ propensity to view the intervention as helpful. This null result is important—our estimates suggest that even highly salient variation in policy outcomes may have limited mobilizing capacity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, Chuck. 2018. “Administration Earmarks up to $12 Billion for Agriculture to Offset Trade War.” Successful Farming, July 24.Google Scholar
Adjemian, Michael K., Smith, Aaron, and He, Wendi. 2021. “Estimating the Market Effect of a Trade War: The Case of Soybean Tariffs.” Food Policy 105: 102152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alrababa’h, Ala’, Williamson, Scott, Dillon, Andrea, Hainmueller, Jens, Hangartner, Dominik, Hotard, Michael, Laitin, David D., et al. 2023. “Learning from Null Effects: A Bottom-Up Approach.” Political Analysis 31 (3): 448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Soybean Association. 2018. “Soybean Farmers Thankful for Final Installment of Market Facilitation Aid.” Press Release. https://soygrowers.com/news-releases/soybean-farmers-thankful-final-installment-market-facilitation-aid/.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M.. 2006. “Party Control of State Government and the Distribution of Public Expenditures.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108 (4): 547–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., Jares, Jake Alton, and Malhotra, Neil. 2022. “Does Receiving Government Assistance Shape Political Attitudes? Evidence from Agricultural Producers.” American Political Science Review 116 (4): 1389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battocchi, Keith, Dillon, Eleanor, Hei, Maggie, Lewis, Greg, Oka, Paul, Oprescu, Miruna, and Syrgkanis, Vasilis. 2019. “EconML: A Python Package for ML-Based Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation.” https://github.com/microsoft/EconML.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Emily J., Bown, Chad P., and Chor, Davin. 2019. “Did Trump’s Trade War Impact the 2018 Election?NBER Working Paper 26434. http://www.nber.org/papers/w26434.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Grumbach, Jacob M.. 2022. “Old Money: Campaign Finance and Gerontocracy in the United States.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2012. “Policy Makes Mass Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Jowei. 2013. “Voter Partisanship and the Effect of Distributive Spending on Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 200–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernozhukov, Victor, Chetverikov, Denis, Demirer, Mert, Duflo, Esther, Hansen, Christian, Newey, Whitney, and Robins, James. 2018. “Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Structural Parameters.” Econometrics Journal 21 (1): C1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chyzh, Olga V., and Urbatsch, Robert. 2021. “Bean Counters: The Effect of Soy Tariffs on Change in Republican Vote Share between the 2016 and 2018 Elections.” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 415–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2009. “Swing Voters, Core Voters, and Distributive Politics.” In Political Representation, ed. Ian Shapiro, 342–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgaard, Jens Olav, Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard, Hansen, Kasper M, and Bhatti, Yosef. 2019. “Bias in Self-Reported Voting and How it Distorts Turnout Models: Disentangling Nonresponse Bias and Overreporting among Danish Voters.” Political Analysis 27 (4): 590–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eller, Donelle. 2018. “Did Trump Violate Deere’s Trademark with His ‘Make Our Farmers Great Again’ Hat?” The Des Moines Register, July 27.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher R., and Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2021. “Polarization and the Decline of Economic Voting in American National Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 102 (1): 83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S.. 2019. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gulotty, Robert, and Strezhnev, Anton. 2024. “The Political Benefits of the Monoculture: Estimating the Electoral Effect of the Market Facilitation Program.” Working Paper. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/b84yn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the “Master Theory”: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 643–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Nicholas, and Kal Munis, B.. 2023. “Place-Based Resentment in Contemporary US Elections: The Individual Sources of America’s Urban-Rural Divide.” Political Research Quarterly 76 (3): 1102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2019. “Extreme Referendum: Donald Trump and the 2018 Midterm Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 134 (1): 938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Joseph P., and Hendricks, Nathan P.. 2020. “Are Farmers Made Whole by Trade Aid?Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42 (2): 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jake Alton, Jares, and Malhotra, Neil. 2024. “Replication Data for: Policy Impact and Voter Mobilization: Evidence from Farmers’ Trade War Experiences.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/S7TOGV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sung Eun, and Margalit, Yotam. 2021. “Tariffs as Electoral Weapons: The Political Geography of the US–China Trade War.” International Organization 75 (1): 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. “Presidential Particularism and Divide-the-Dollar Politics.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1977. “Agrarian Political Behavior in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Minghao, He, Xi, Zhang, Wendong, Shuyang, Qu, Rodriguez, Lulu, and Gbeda, James M.. 2023. “Farmers’ Reactions to the US–China Trade War: Perceptions versus Behaviors.” Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2 (3): 386401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Corn Growers Association. 2018. “NCGA: USDA Trade Aid Comes Up Short, Again.” Press Release.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2015. Governors, Grants, and Elections: Fiscal Federalism in the American States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nova, Annie. 2022. “‘No Different than the Mortgage Crisis’: NAACP President Derrick Johnson on Why Student Loan Cancellation is Needed.” CNBC, June 6.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2016. “All about that Base: Changing Campaign Strategies in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Party Politics 22 (2): 179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1083–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkovic, Marc. 2023. “Relaxing Assumptions, Improving Inference: Integrating Machine Learning and the Linear Regression.” American Political Science Review 117 (3): 1053–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regmi, Anita. 2019. “Retaliatory Tariffs and U.S. Agriculture.” Congressional Research Service Report R45903. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45903.pdf.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. M. 1988. “Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric Regression.” Econometrica 56 (4): 931–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan A. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2018. “Crop Progress Report for 06/18/2018.”Google Scholar
USDA Office of the Chief Economist. 2018. “Trade Damage Estimation for the Market Facilitation Program and Food Purchase and Distribution Program.”.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jares and Malhotra supplementary material

Jares and Malhotra supplementary material
Download Jares and Malhotra supplementary material(File)
File 588.5 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Jares and Malhotra Dataset

Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.