Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:09:18.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pattern of Canadian Politics: The Elections of 1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Lionel H. Laing
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

The great problem of Canadian federalism is to be found in the sectionalism which is a standing challenge to national unity. Superficial conclusions drawn from the response to national recruitment, war bond drives, and such evidences, which form the stock in trade of the professional patriot, do not stand up against the realities of political behavior. This is revealed at many levels, in the parliaments (provincial and dominion), in federal-provincial relations, and finally at the grass roots as demonstrated at the polls. Geography, history, and economic considerations are woven into this pattern.

Geographically, there are four main regions—Maritimes, St. Lawrence and Great Lakes, Prairies, West Coast. Historically and culturally, the St. Lawrence-Great Lakes region is sub-divided into the former political subdivisions of Lower and Upper Canada, now the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, respectively. In terms of economics, each area presents individual problems, and as contrasting as the wheat-growing prairies and the financial-urban eastern provinces. To the sociologist, there is the complexity of peoples as diverse in background as the French Canadian of Quebec and the Central European immigrant in the West. With these factors in mind, the voting pattern of the people may be discerned, at least in part. And the 1945 general election offers an interesting case study.

Type
Foreign Government and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 While the full official report of the Chief Electoral Officer was not available at the time of writing, Part IV of it was issued in advance and has been used as the basis of this study, along with the Canadian War Service Voting Regulations official listing of the party affiliation of the candidates. The figures on aggregate votes and lost deposits are from the Canadian press dispatches of June 12 and 19, and also the New York Times of June 13, 1945.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.