Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:43:27.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lessons in Lobbying for Free Trade in 19th-Century Britain: To Concentrate or Not

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey
Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey*
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I present a modified version of the public choice interest group model that integrates concentrated and deconcentrated interests with successful lobbying. It is argued that effective free trade lobbying required the political fusion of the economic interests representing two fundamental changes in nineteenth-century Britain's economy: (1) geographic concentration of the core export industry (cotton textiles) and (2) deconcentration of the broader export sector both geographically and in terms of industrial structure. Empirical evidence from both national and individual levels firmly supports the contention that the timing and political success of Britain's nineteenth-century free trade lobby required the combined forces of core export interests and the more diverse and geographically more evenly distributed interests of the export sector as a whole.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 37 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baack, Bennett D., and Ray, Edward John. 1973. “Tariff Policy and Comparative Advantages in the Iron and Steel Industry: 1870–1929.” Explorations in Economic History 11:3–23.Google Scholar
Baack, Bennett D., and Ray, Edward John. 1983. “The Political Economy of Tariff Policy: A Case Study of the United States.” Explorations in Economic History 20:73–93.Google Scholar
Bailey, Andrew J. 1984. “The Impact of the Napoleonic Wars on the Development of the Cotton Industry in Lancashire: A Study of the Structure and Behaviour of Firms during the Industrial Revolution.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 1989. “Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade.” Working Paper No. 3147. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E. 1985. The Political Economy of U.S. Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, Witt. 1925. Industrial Society in England towards the End of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caves, Richard E. 1976. “Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada's Tariff Structure.” Canadian Journal of Economics 9:278–300.Google Scholar
Chaloner, W. H. 1970. “The Agitation against the Corn Laws.” In Popular Movements c. 1830–1850, ed. Ward, John T.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cottrell, P. L. 1980. Industrial Finance 1830–1914: The Finance and Organization of English Manufacturing Industry. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Crosby, Travis L. 1976. Sir Robert Peel's Administration, 1841–1846. Devon, England: David & Charles.Google Scholar
Davis, Ralph. 1979. The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, Edward P. 1975. “Industrialization and the Development of Urban Business Communities: Research Problems, Sources, and Techniques.” Local Historian 11:457–65.Google Scholar
Dutton, H. I., and Jones, S. R. H.. 1983. “Invention and Innovation in the British Pin Industry, 1790–1850.” Business History Review 57:175–93.Google Scholar
Fang, Hsien-t'ing. [1930] 1978. The Triumph of the Factory System in England. Reprint. Philadelphia: Porcupine.Google Scholar
Gatrell, V. A. C. 1977. “Labour, Power, and the Size of Firms in Lancashire Cotton in the Second Quarter of the Nineteenth Century.” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 30:95–139.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1977. “Economic Interdependence and National Security in Historical Perspective.” In Economic Issues and National Security, ed. Klaus Knorr and Frank Trager. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Godek, Paul E. 1985. “Industry Structure and Redistribution through Trade Restrictions.” Journal of Law and Economics 28:687–703.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Parliament. [1842] 1970. Parliamentary Papers (Commons), 1841 Census Great Britain, Occupational Abstract with Preface (Popul. 5). Shannon: Irish University Press.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Public Record Office. 1825–1846. Exports, Produce and Manufactures of the United Kingdom. Cust. 9.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene, and Helpman, Elhanan. 1988. “Product Development and International Trade.” Princeton University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Healey, Joseph F. 1984. Statistics: A Tool for Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Howe, Anthony. 1984. The Cotton Masters, 1830–1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” World Politics 29:317–47.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1988. “Endogenous Innovations, International Trade, and Growth.” Presented at the State University of New York, Problem of Development Conference, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1988. Power, Protection, and Free Trade: International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lavergne, Real P. 1983. The Political Economy of U.S. Tariffs. Toronto: Academic.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, R., and LeRoux, A. A.. 1980. “The Size of Firms in the Cotton Industry: Manchester 1815–1841.” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 33:72–82.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, R., and LeRoux, A. A.. 1982. “Marshall and the Birth of Firms in the Early Nineteenth-Century Cotton Industry.” Business History 24:141–55.Google Scholar
McCord, Norman. 1958. The Anti-Corn Law League, 1838–1846. London: George Allan & Unwin.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P. 1986. “Endogenous Policy Theory: The Political Economy of U.S. Protection.” Presented at the Conference on Free Trade in the World Economy, Kiel, West Germany.Google Scholar
Mantoux, Paul. 1948. The Industrial Revolution in the Eighteenth Century. London: Johnathan Cape.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R., and Deane, Phyllis. 1971. Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 1986. Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Jane E. 1950. Guide to the National and Provincial Directories of Bigland and Wales, Excluding London, Published before 1856. London: Offices of the Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Page, David. 1974. “Commercial Directories and Market Towns.” Local Historian 11:85–88.Google Scholar
Pincus, Jonathan J. 1975. “Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs.” Journal of Political Economy 83:757–78.Google Scholar
Prentice, Archibald. 1853. History of the Anti-Corn Law League. 2 vols. London: W. & F. G. Cash.Google Scholar
Ray, Edward J. 1981. “The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the United States.” Journal of Political Economy 89:105–21.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1988. “Linking Constituency Interests to Legislative Voting Behavior: The Role of District Economic and Electoral Composition in the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1989. “Specific Factors, Capital Markets, Portfolio Diversification, and Free Trade: Domestic Determinants of the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” Presented at the joint convention of the British International Studies Association and the International Studies Association, London.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 1991. “An Equilibrium Model of Trade Policy Liberalization: Looking Inside the British ‘Hegemon’ of the Nineteenth Century.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Shaw, Gareth. 1978. “The Content and Reliability of Nineteenth-Century Trade Directories.” Local Historian 13:205–7.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory.” International Organization 39:579–614.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1984. “The Hegemon's Dilemma: Great Britain, the United States, and the International Economic Order.” International Organization 38:355–86.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. 1949. “Concentration and Specialization in the Lancashire Cotton Industry, 1825–1850.” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 1–3:114–21.Google Scholar
Timmins, Geoffrey. 1979. “Measuring Industrial Growth from Trade Directories.” Local Historian 13:349–51.Google Scholar
Timmins, J. G. 1982. “Concentration and Integration in the Sheffield Crucible Steel Industry.” Business History 24:61–78.Google Scholar
Von Tunzelmann, G. N. 1978. Steam Power and British Industrialization to 1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, Peter. 1976. “The Use of Business Directories in Comparing the Industrial Structure of Towns.” Local Historian 12:152–56.Google Scholar
Wootton, Graham. 1975. Pressure Groups in Britain 1720–1970. London: Allen Lane Penguin Books.Google Scholar