Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T07:34:36.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Initiative and Referendum in Arkansas Come of Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David Y. Thomas
David Y. Thomas
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislative Notes and Reviews
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 1933 , pp. 66 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hodges v. Dawdy, 104 Ark. 583 (1912).

2 State ex. rel. City of Little Rock v. Donaghey, 106 Ark. 56 (1912).

3 Hildreth v. Taylor, 117 Ark. 465 (1915).

4 Report of the Secretary of State, 1925–6, p. 230. This report gives the votes on all proposals down to 1926; also the amendments adopted.

5 Brickhouse v. Hill, 167 Ark. 513 (1925).

6 Luter v. Pulaski County Hospital Association, 182 Ark., 1099 (1931).

7 Stanfield v. Friddle, 185 Ark. 873; 50 Southwestern (2nd) 237 (1932).

8 Combs v. Gray, 170 Ark. 956 (1926).

9 Babb v. El Dorado, 170 Ark. 10 (1926).

10 Acts of 1927, p. 1208; Acts of 1929, II, p. 1522.

11 Jackson v. Madison County, 175 Ark. 826 (1927).

12 Sen. Jour., 1931, pp. 30–32.

13 Fayetteville Daily Democrat, July 14, 1932.

14 Arkansas Gazette, November 30, 1932, 1: 6.

15 McAdams v. Henley, 169 Ark. 97 (1925).

16 Acts of 1927, p. 1215.

17 Ark-Ash Lumber Co. v. Pride and Fairley, 162 Ark. 235 (1924).

18 Hanson v. Hodges, 109 Ark. 479 (1913).

19 Whittmore v. Terral, 140 Ark. 493 (1919).

20 Acts of 1915, p. 402; Acts of 1921, p. 7; Acts of 1927, p. 487.

21 Fayetteville Daily Democrat, July 14, 1932.

22 Southwestern Cities Distributing Co. v. Carter, 184 Ark. 1–13 (193l).

23 Terral v. Arkansas Light and Power Company, 137 Ark. 523 (1919).

24 Arkansas Gazette, November 13, 1932.

25 Ibid., December 6, 1932.

26 Southwest American, December 6, 1932.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.