Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T13:41:08.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industrial Self-Management and Political Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Edward S. Greenberg*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to test the widely shared view that the experience of industrial democracy, the experience of direct decision making at places of work, necessarily leads to the enhancement of cooperative and egalitarian orientations among participants. Based on data collected through indepth interviews and questionnaires in Pacific-Northwest plywood cooperatives, the article argues that in market societies, such experiments in industrial democracy do not have the hypothesized results. Indeed, they seem to encourage the development of values most closely identified with classical liberalism or what MacPherson terms “possessive individualism.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Perry (1976). “The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.” New Left Review, 100: 578.Google Scholar
Argyris, Chris (1965). Organization and Innovation. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter (1967). The Theory of Democratic Elitism. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bay, Christian (1958). The Structure of Freedom. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellas, Carl (1972). Industrial Democracy and the Worker Owned Firm. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Berman, Katrina (1967). Worker-Owned Plywood Companies. Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Paul (1974). “Run Your Own Business: Worker-Owned Plywood Firms.” Working Papers 2, No. 2, pp. 2434.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Paul (1969). Industrial Democracy. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Boggs, Carl (1976). Gramsci's Marxism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cammett, John H. (1967). Antonio Gramsci and the Origins of Italian Communism. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. (1919). Self Government in Industry. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. (1920). Guild Socialism Restated. London: Leonard Parsons.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michael, et al. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fiori, Giuseppe (1970). Antonio Gramsci: Life of a Revolutionary. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Gooding, Judson (1972). The Job Revolution. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1975). The Modern Prince. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1973). Letters from Prison. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1954). L'Ordine Nuevo. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Edward S. (1980). “Participation in Industrial Decision-Making and Work Satisfaction.” Social Science Quarterly 60, No. 4, pp. 551–69.Google Scholar
Gorz, Andre (1967). A Strategy for Labor. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gorz, Andre (1973). Socialism and Revolution. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Horney, Karen (1950). Neurosis and Human Growth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Jenkins, David (1974). Job Power. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kariel, Henry, ed. (1970). Frontiers of Democratic Theory. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert (1962). Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham (1965). Eupsychian Management. Homewood, Ill.: R.D. Irwin.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest (1970). “The Leninist Theory of Revolution.” International Socialist Review 31:1025.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest (1973). “The Debate on Workers' Control.” In Hunnius, Gerry, et al. (eds.), Workers' Control. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Carl (1951). Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard, and Cobb, Jonathan (1973). The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sheppard, H. L., and Herrick, Neal (1972. Where Have All the Robots Gone? New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Terkel, Studs (1974). Working. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon (1959). The Russian Revolution. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1972). Work in America. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Vanek, Jaroslav, ed. (1975). Self-Management. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Gwyn (1960). “The Concept of Egemonia in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21:586–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Gwyn (1975). Proletarian Order: Antonio Gramsci, Factory Councils and the Origins of Italian Communism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Wills, Gary (1970). Nixon Agonistes. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.