Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T07:15:04.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Taxes on Growth and Distribution in Developed Capitalist Countries: A Cross-National Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Claudio J. Katz ,
Vincent A. Mahler  and
Michael G. Franz
Claudio J. Katz
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago
Vincent A. Mahler
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago
Michael G. Franz
Affiliation:
Loyola University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Has the scope of public planning in contemporary capitalist economies promoted or hindered economic growth and income distribution? We explore this question by assessing the impact of various mechanisms for raising government revenues on investment, growth, and income distribution in 22 developed market economy countries. The article considers whether growth and distribution are affected differently by governments' relative reliance on personal and corporate income taxes, social security contributions, property taxes, and sales and value added taxes, or by the relative progressivity of tax mechanisms. Our findings lend support to the assertion that fiscal instruments (especially personal income taxes) can be used successfully to achieve greater income equality. On the other hand, these findings run counter to the conventional notion that an automatic trade-off exists between an active public sector and a dynamic, expanding economy: although there is surely some tension between the economic goals of growth and equality, it is not at all clear that they are necessarily incompatible or that government can contribute only to the latter.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 871 - 886
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blalock, H. M.Causal inferences, closed populations and measures of association. American Political Science Review, 1967, 61, 130–136.Google Scholar
Break, G. F.Corporate tax integration: radical revisionism or common sense? In Boskin, M. J. (Ed.). Federal tax reform: myths and realities. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1978, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
Break, G. F.Income taxes and incentives to work: an empirical study. American Economic Review, 1957, 47, 529–549.Google Scholar
Browning, E. K., & Johnson, W. R.The distribution of the tax burden. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1979.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R.The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 1978, 78, 1243–1261.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R.On the limits of the public economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1982, 459, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowart, A. T.The economic policies of European governments, Part II: Fiscal policy. British Journal of Political Science, 1978, 8, 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, M. (Ed.). The American economy in transition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, M.Facing the social security crisis. The Public Interest, 1977, 47, 88–100.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A.Statistical analysis in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
Franz, M. G., Katz, C. J., & Mahler, V. A.The impact of taxes and government expenditures on growth and equity in developed capitalist countries: a crossnational study. Paper presented at the 1982 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Legitimation crisis, McCarthy, T. (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R. L., & Thurow, L.Five economic challenges. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Herber, B. P.Modern public finance (4th ed.). Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1979.Google Scholar
Hilton, G.Intermediate politometrics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). World development report, 1981. Washington, D.C.: IBRD, 1981.Google Scholar
Jackman, R. W.A note on the measurement of growth rates in crossnational research. American Journal of Sociology, 1980, 86, 604–617. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, R. W.Socialist parties and income inequality in western industrial societies. Journal of Politics, 1980, 42, 135–149. (b)Google Scholar
Jain, S.Size distribution of income: a compilation of data. Washington, D.C.: IBRD, 1975.Google Scholar
Kurz, M.Negative income taxation. In Boskin, M. J. (Ed.). Federal tax reform: myths and realities. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1978, pp. 145–169.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S.Growth, population and income distribution. New York: W. W. Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S.Applied regression. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, No. 22. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E.Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B.Democratic theory: essays in retrieval. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Mieszkowski, P.The choice of tax base: consumption versus income taxation. In Boskin, M. J. (Ed.). Federal tax reform: myths and realities. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1978, pp. 27–53.Google Scholar
Offe, C.The theory of the capitalist state and the problem of policy formation. In Lindberg, L.et al. (Eds.). Stress and contradiction in modern capitalism. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1975, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Public expenditure trends. Paris: OECD Studies in Resource Allocation, No. 5. 1978.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The taxation of net wealth, capital transfers and capital gains of individuals. Paris: OECD, 1979.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Income tax schedules: distribution of taxpayers and revenues. Paris: OECD, 1981 (a).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. National accounts of OECD countries, Vol. II. Paris: OECD, 1981 (b).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Revenue statistics of OECD member countries, 1965-80. Paris: OECD, 1981 (c).Google Scholar
Pechman, J. A., & Okner, B.Who bears the tax burden? Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1974.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K.The great transformation. Boston: Beacon, 1944.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M.Income distribution in OECD countries. OECD Economic Outlook, Occasional Studies, 1976, 07, 3–36.Google Scholar
Sivard, R. L.World military and social expenditures. Leesburg, Va.: World Priorities, 1981.Google Scholar
Stack, S.Political organization and the degree of tax progressiveness. International Review of Modern Sociology, 1978, 8, 113–126.Google Scholar
Thurow, L. C.The impact of taxes on the American economy. New York: Praeger, 1971.Google Scholar
Thurow, L.The zero-sum society: distribution and the possibilities for economic change. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Wanniski, J.Taxes, revenues, and the “Laffer Curve.” In Laffer, A. B. & Seymour, J. P. (Eds.). The economics of the tax revolt. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L.The welfare state and equality: structural and ideological roots of public expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.