Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T04:54:29.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Illusion of Choice: Defense and Welfare in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1948-1978

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William K. Domke ,
Richard C. Eichenberg  and
Catherine M. Kelleher
William K. Domke
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Richard C. Eichenberg
Affiliation:
Florida Slate University
Catherine M. Kelleher
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the tendency of governments to trade off welfare spending for defense has generated diverse and often contradictory findings. This study attempts to clarify the issue of trade-offs by examining expenditure patterns since 1948 for the four major NA TO allies: United States, United Kingdom, Federal Republic of Germany, and France. When viewed from the perspective of long-term trends in shares of outlays, trade-offs are evident. When short-term changes in expenditure, which are more germane to the potential for one spending category to benefit at the expense of the other are studied, no pattern of trade-off can be detected. A three-equation model is estimated to control for the variety of possible determining factors of public resource allocation. In none of the four nations does a pattern of trade-off emerge, except in periods of wartime or postwar reconstruction. These findings are consistent with the ability of governments to finance new spending through either increased taxes or larger budget deficits. The growing disinclination to use these methods, however, suggests that the potential for trade-offs has perhaps reappeared in the 1980s.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 19 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caputo, D. 1979. New perspectives on the public policy implications of defense and welfare expenditures. Policy Science 6:423–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crecine, J. P. 1974. Defense budgeting, In Commission on the organization of the government for the conduct of foreign policy, Appendix K.Google Scholar
Cusack, T. R., and Ward, M. D. 1982. Military spending in the United States, Soviet Union, and People's Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution 25:429–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. W., and Crecine, J. P. 1980. Defense spending, non-defense spending, and the need for fiscal restraint: two models of the presidential budgetary process. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Frey, B., and Schneider, F. 1979. An econometric model with an endogenous government sector. Public Choice 34:29–43.Google Scholar
Goldmann, K., and Lagerkranz, J. 1977. Neither tension nor detente: east-west relations in Europe. Cooperation and Conflict 12:251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H., and Wildavsky, A. 1974. The private government of public money. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe,” Daedalus 90:110–63.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1961. The common defense. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1975. The United States. In The crisis of democracy, ed. Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., and Watanuki, J., New York: New York University Press, pp. 59–156.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1977. The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1982. Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review 75:880–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, C. M., Domke, W. K., and Eichenberg, R. C. 1980. Guns, butter and growth: patterns of public expenditure in four western democracies, 1920-1975. In Defense of politics of the Western Alliance. Fedder, Edwin H., ed. New York: Praeger, pp. 153–88.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., and Nye, N.S. 1977. Power and interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Laasko, M., and Taagepera, R. 1979. The ‘effective’ number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–28.Google Scholar
Miller, L., and Clark, M. 1977. The welfare effort in the United States. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 4:383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, E. L. 1974. Foreign policy and interdependence in Gaullist France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, E. L. 1976. Modernization and the transformation of international relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nincic, M. 1982. The arms race. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Nincic, M. and Cusack, T. R. 1979. The political economy of U.S. military spending. Journal of Peace Research 16:101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, C. W. 1978. A reactive linkage model of the U.S. defense expenditure policy making process. American Political Science Review 72:941–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroff, K. 1977. The warfare-welfare tradeoff: health, public aid and housing. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 4:366–81.Google Scholar
Perroff, K. and Podolak-Warren, M. 1979. Does spending for defense cut spending on health? British Journal of Political Science 9:37–49.Google Scholar
Pryor, F. L. 1968. Public expenditure in communist and capitalist countries. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.Google Scholar
Rattinger, H.. 1975. Armaments, detente, and bureaucracy: the case of the arms race in Europe. Journal of Conflict Resolution 19:571–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, B. M. 1970. What price vigilance? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sprout, H., and Sprout, M. 1968. On the dilemma of declining resources and rising demands. World Politics 20:660–93.Google Scholar
Stoll, R. T. 1982. Let the researcher beware. American Journal of Political Science 26: 270–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. 1971. Principles of econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. R. 1978. Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. J. 1980. SHAZAM: an econometrics computer program. Houston: Social Science Computer Lab, Rice University, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. 1975. Budgeting. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. 1974. The welfare state and equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, A., and Theil, H. 1962. Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 30:54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunker, A. 1972. Finanzplanung und bundeshaushatt. Frankfurt: Alfred Metzner.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.