Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:02:45.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Going Beyond the State?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John Bendix ,
Bartholomew H. Sparrow ,
Bertell Ollman  and
Timothy Mitchell
John Bendix
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College, Haverford College
Bartholomew H. Sparrow
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Bertell Ollman
Affiliation:
New York University
Timothy Mitchell
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Timothy Mitchell's article “The Limits of the State” in the March 1991 issue of this Review stimulated an unusual variety of interested comments. John Bendix, Bartholomew Sparrow, and Bertell Ollman offer critiques and suggestions from quite different points of view. In response, Mitchell clarifies further the distinctiveness of his own approach and its implications.

Type
Controversy
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 1007 - 1021
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, Robert R., and Friedland, Roger. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel. 1990. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1970. Reading Capital. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1976. Positions. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin and Skocpol, Theda. 1988. “Redefining the New Deal: World War II and the Development of Social Provision in the United States.” In The Politics of Social Policy in the United States, eds. Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola and Skocpol, Theda. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. 1945. The Development of Public Services in Western Europe. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. 1961. Principles of Social and Political Theory. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1977. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, Bendix, John, and Furniss, Norman. 1990. “Reflections on Modern Western States and Civil Societies.” In The Political Sociology of the State, ed. Braungart, Richard and Braungart, Margaret. Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
Benn, Stanley I., and Peters, Richard S.. 1968. The Principles of Political Thought. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1977. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State.” Socialist Revolution 33:6–27.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. Trans. Charney, Craig. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 1989. “Two Methods in Search of Science.” Theory and Society 18:759–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burckhardt, Jakob. 1943. Force and Freedom: Reflections on History. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James, ed. 1989. The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Martin. 1984. The State and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilcote, Ronald. 1981. Theories of Comparative Politics. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard, and March, James G.. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. 1990. The Power Elite and the State. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, and O'Leary, Brendan. 1987. Theories of the State. London: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1980. The State Tradition in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1979. “On the ‘Science’ of the State.” In The State, ed. Graubard, Stephen. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Ed. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fried, Morton. 1968. “State: The Institution.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1985. The Nation–State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hague, Rod, and Harrop, Martin. 1987. Comparative Government and Politics. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit. 1989. The Magic Mirror: Law in American History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1988. Reasons of State: Oil Politics and the Capacities of American Government. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Skocpol, Theda. 1987. “Expanding Social Benefits: The Role of Social Security.” Political Science Quarterly 102:389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1980. City Trenches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 23:223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organizational State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78:734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. 1942. German Ideology. Trans. Pascal, R.. London: International.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1977. Selected Writings. Ed. McLellan, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1988. Colonising Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1990. “Everyday Metaphors of Power.” Theory and Society 19:545–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics.” American Political Science Review 85:77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettl, J. P. 1968. “The State as a Conceptual Variable.” World Politics 20:559–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1981. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ollman, Bertell. N.d. Dialectical Investigations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1974. “Structural Problems of the Capitalist State.” German Political Sutdies 1:31–55.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1973. Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Review of Politics 36:85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1986. “Neo-corporatism and the State.” In The Political Economy of Corporatism, ed. Grant, Wyn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron, ed. 1991. Is America Different? Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1948. Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1981. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10:155–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Ikenberry, G. John. 1983. “The Political Formation of the American Welfare State.” Comparative Social Research 6:87–148.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen L. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Bartholomew H. 1991. “The State and the Politics of Oil.” Theory and Society 20:259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Frederick. 1968. “State: The Concept.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, ed. Sills, David. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Ed. Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. Henderson, A.M. and Parsons, Talcott. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, Thomas Dewar. 1960. The Vocabulary of Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.