Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:39:18.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Framework for Measuring Leaders’ Willingness to Use Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2020

JEFF CARTER Open the ORCID record for JEFF CARTER [Opens in a new window]  and
CHARLES E. SMITH JR. Open the ORCID record for CHARLES E. SMITH JR. [Opens in a new window]
JEFF CARTER*
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University
CHARLES E. SMITH JR.*
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
*
Jeff Carter Assistant Professor, Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, jtc475@gmail.com.
Charles E. Smith Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Mississippi, pssmith@olemiss.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political leaders’ willingness to use force is central to many explanations of foreign policy and interstate conflict. Unfortunately, existing indicators typically measure one aspect of this general concept, have limited coverage, and/or are not derived independently of leaders’ participation in interstate conflicts. We develop a strategy for constructing measures of leaders’ underlying willingness to use force with data on their background experiences, political orientations, and psychological traits in a Bayesian latent variable framework. Our approach produces measures of latent hawkishness for all national leaders between 1875 and 2004 that offer advantages over existing proxies along multiple dimensions, including construct validity, predictive validity, and measurement uncertainty. Importantly, our statistical framework allows scholars to build upon our measures by incorporating additional data and altering the assumptions underlying our models.

Type
Letter
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 114 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 1352 - 1358
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Giacomo Chiozza, Michael Horowitz, Heather Ondercin, Scott Wolford, and the editors and reviewers at the APSR for helpful comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. We also thank Michael Horowitz, Allan Stam, Kali Ellis, Katsunori Seki, Laron Williams, Thomas Brambor, Johannes Lindvall, and Jonathan Keller for making their data publicly available. We could not have written this article without their work. A supplementary appendix contains additional technical details, diagnostic analyses, and results tables. Replication materials are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7WFX1K.

References

Bafumi, Joseph, Gelman, Andrew, Park, David, and Kaplan, Noah. 2005. “Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation.” Political Analysis 13 (2): 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoli, Andrew, Dafoe, Allan, and Trager, Robert. 2019. “Is There a War Party? Party Change, the Left–Right Divide, and International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (4): 950–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, and Lindvall, Johannes. 2018. “The Ideology of Heads of Government, 1870–2012.” European Political Science 17 (2): 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, Michael, and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. 1997. A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Bob, Gelman, Andrew, Hoffman, Matt, Lee, Daniel, Goodrich, Ben, Betancourt, Michael, Brubaker, Michael, Guo, Jiqiang, Li, Peter, and Riddell, Allen. 2017. “Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.” Journal of Statistical Software 76 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Jeff, and Nordstrom, Timothy. 2017. “Term Limits, Leader Preferences, and Interstate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (3): 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff, and Weeks, Jessica. 2015. “Revolution, Personalist Dictatorships, and International Conflict.” International Organization 69 (01): 163–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Goemans, Hein. 2010. “Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders and War.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart. 2004. “The MID3 Data Set, 1993-2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (3): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffington, Colton. 2018. “Do Hawks and Doves Deliver? The Words and Deeds of Foreign Policy in Democracies.” Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (1): 64–85.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael, Stam, Allan, and Ellis, Cali. 2015. Why Leaders Fight. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Jonathan. 2005. “Leadership Style, Regime Type, and Foreign Policy Crisis Behavior: A Contingent Monadic Peace?” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, Joshua. 2016. Resolve in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth. 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seki, Katsunori, and Williams, Laron. 2014. “Updating the Party Government Data Set.” Electoral Studies 34: 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bradley, and Spaniel, William. 2020. “Introducing $$ \nu $$ -CLEAR: A Latent Variable Approach to Measuring Nuclear Proficiency.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 37 (42): 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan Development Team. 2018. “RStan: the R interface to Stan.” R package version 2.18.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Treier, Shawn, and Jackman, Simon. 2008. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuong, Quang. 1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses.” Econometrica 57 (2): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Cathy Xuanxuan, and Wolford, Scott. 2018. “Leaders, States, and Reputations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (10): 2087–2117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2013. “In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries.” International Security 38 (1): 7–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Carter and Smith Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/7WFX1K
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Carter and Smith supplementary material

Carter and Smith supplementary material

Download Carter and Smith supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 399.5 KB