Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:25:44.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Safe” Districts5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 542 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6 Turner, p. 201.

7 At least since 1896 most House election winners have received 60 per cent or more of the two-party vote. See Ewing, Cortez A. M., “Primaries as Real Elections,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 29 (March, 1949), 293–298Google Scholar, and Mayhew, David R., “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals,” Polity, 6 (Spring, 1974), 295–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Mayhew, David R., “Congressional Representation: Theory and Practice in Drawing the Districts,” in Reapportionment in the 1970s, ed. Polsby, Nelson W. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), pp. 249–285, at 268Google Scholar.

10 Key, V. O. Jr., Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. (New York: Crowell, 1964), p. 435Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.