Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T05:07:01.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodernism and the Public Sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Dana R. Villa
Dana R. Villa
Affiliation:
Amherst College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of the public sphere, of an institutionalized arena of discursive interaction, is central to democratic theory and practice. The modern age has, however, witnessed the erosion of a public realm distinct from the state and the market. In response to this erosion, public realm theory, notably the work of Arendt and Habermas, attempts to theorize the minimal conditions necessary for a discursive realm free of structural coercion or manipulation. The resulting normative conception of the public sphere has come under sharp attack by postmodern theorists, including Foucault, Lyotard, and Baudrillard, who question the basic presuppositions of public realm theory. I examine their objections and show how the public realm theory of Arendt can be viewed as motivated by concerns similar to the postmoderns'. Against Habermas, I argue that Arendt's public realm theory is less concerned with the question of legitimation than with the theorization of an agonistic political subjectivity.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 712 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1957. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968a. Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968b. Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968c. Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1977. The Life of the Mind. 2 vols. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1988. Selected Writings. Ed. Poster, Mark. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1984. “Epistemologies of Postmodernism.” New German Critique 33:103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. Critique, Norm, Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard. 1986. Philosophical–Political Profiles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William. 1991. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1980. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Trans. Tomlinson, Hugh. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Gramtnatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayartri. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dews, Peter. 1987. Logics of Disintegration. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas L. 1988. “The Politics of Post-modern Aesthetics: Habermas Contra Foucault.” Political Theory 16:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1, An Introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. Power/Knowledge. Ed. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “On Politics and Ethics.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. “Politics and Reason.” In Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture, ed. Kritzman, Lawrence D.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere.” Socialtext 8–9:56–80.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society. Trans. Shapiro, Jeremy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Theory and Practice. Trans. Viertel, John. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. Philosophical–Political Profiles. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 vols. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Janicaud, Dominique. 1992. “Rationality, Force, and Power: Foucault and Habermas's Criticisms.” In Michel Foucault, Philosopher, trans. Armstrong, Timothy J.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1985. Just Gaming. Trans. Godzich, Wlad. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. van den Abbeele, George. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1979. Twilight of the Idols. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1985. “Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity.” In Habermas and Modernity, ed. Bernstein, Richard. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1984. “Foucault on Freedom and Truth.” Political Theory 12:152–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, Dana R. 1992. “Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche and the Aestheticization of Political Action.” Political Theory 20:275–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht. 1985. “Reason, Utopia, and Enlightenment.” In Habermas and Modernity, ed. Bernstein, Richard. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K. 1991. Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.