Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:28:21.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Logrolling and the Paradox of Voting: Are They Really Logically Equivalent? A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Peter Bernholz*
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Vote Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Koehler, David H., “Vote-Trading and the Voting Paradox: A Proof of Logical Equivalence,” American Political Science Review, 69 (09, 1975), 954960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Bernholz, Peter, “Logrolling, Arrow-Paradox and Decision Rules: A Generalization,” Kyklos, 22 (fasc. 1, 1974), 53 Google Scholar, assumption A5.