Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-4xs5l Total loading time: 0.3 Render date: 2021-06-16T11:37:48.181Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2012

Boston University
Boston University
E-mail address:


Do voters reward presidents for increased federal spending in their local constituencies? Previous research on the electoral consequences of federal spending has focused almost exclusively on Congress, mostly with null results. However, in a county- and individual-level study of presidential elections from 1988 to 2008, we present evidence that voters reward incumbent presidents (or their party's nominee) for increased federal spending in their communities. This relationship is stronger in battleground states. Furthermore, we show that federal grants are an electoral currency whose value depends on both the clarity of partisan responsibility for its provision and the characteristics of the recipients. Presidents enjoy increased support from spending in counties represented by co-partisan members of Congress. At the individual level, we also find that ideology conditions the response of constituents to spending; liberal and moderate voters reward presidents for federal spending at higher levels than conservatives. Our results suggest that, although voters may claim to favor deficit reduction, presidents who deliver such benefits are rewarded at the ballot box.

Research Article
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Abramowitz, A.I. 2008. “Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the Time-for-change Model.PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (3): 691–95.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M. 2004. “Blind Retrospection: Electoral Responses to Drought, Flu, and Shark Attacks.” Princeton University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., Sullivan, John L., and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz before a Blind Audience?’American Political Science Review 83 (1): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Saving, Jason. 1997. “Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s.Political Research Quarterly 50 (4): 809–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael and Schousen, M. M. 1993. “Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations? Testing the Intentional Models of Split-ticket Voting.American Politics Research 21 (4): 410–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2004. “Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages when Officeholders Retire Strategically.Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (4): 487515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?Political Psychology 27 (5): 731–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, Cary, Gilligan, Thomas, Hendershott, Robert, and Zupan, Mark. 1995. “Slicing the Federal Government Net Spending Pie: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why.American Economic Review 85 (3): 624–29.Google Scholar
Balla, Steven, Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 515–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry, and Zaller, John. 2001. “Presidential Vote Models: A Recount.PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (1): 820.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.American Political Science Review 104 (4): 783–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickers, Kenneth, and Stein, Robert. 1996. “The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel.American Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 13001326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickers, Kenneth, and Stein, Robert. 2000. “The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican Era.Journal of Politics 62 (4): 1070–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Books, John, and Prysby, Charles. 1999. “Contextual Effects on Retrospective Economic Evaluations: The Impact of the State and Local Economy.Political Behavior 21 (1): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 1972. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election.American Political Science Review 66 (6): 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Bush Would Emphasize Airport Construction.” 1988. Aviation Week and Space Technology, September, 19.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jowei. 2010. “The Effect of Electoral Geography on Pork Barreling in Bicameral Legislatures.American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jowei. 2011. “Voter Partisanship and the Effect of Distributive Spending on Political Participation.” University of Michigan Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1987. “The Personal and Political Underpinnings of Economic Forecasts.American Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 559–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1966. “The Concept of a Normal Vote.” In Elections and the Political Order, eds. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. New York: Wiley, 939.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Matthew J. 1999. Bitter Harvest: FDR, Presidential Power and the Growth of the Presidential Branch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, R.S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.American Political Science Review 83 (2): 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Bafumi, Joseph, and Wilson, Bret. 2001. “Was the 2000 Presidential Election Predictable?PS Political Science and Politics 34 (4): 815–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Stoker, Laura. 2011. “Caught in the Draft: The Effects of Vietnam Draft Lottery Status on Political Attitudes.American Political Science Review 105 (2): 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Andersen, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.Journal of Politics 68 (1): 194207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach.American Political Science Review 102 (1): 95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Segura, Gary M., and Barratt, Bethany A.. 2004. “War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of Legislators.Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Segura, Gary M., and Wilkening, Michael. 1997. “All Politics Are Local: Local Losses and Individual Attitudes toward the Vietnam War.Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (5): 669–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, John T., and Reeves, Andrew. 2011. “Make it Rain? Retrospection and the Attentive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 340–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2010. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K. and Freedman, P.. 2002. “Lessons Learned: Campaign Advertising in the 2000 Elections.Political Communication 19 (1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C. 2011. “Politicizing Agency Spending Authority: Lessons from a Bush-era Scandal.American Political Science Review 105 (4): 717–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 2007. “The Iraq War, Partisanship, and Candidate Attributes: Variation in Partisan Swing in the 2006 US House Elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 531–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1998. “Individuals, Institutions, and Public Preferences over Public Finance.American Political Science Review 92 (3): 513–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselswerdt, Jake, and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2011. “Comparing attitudes toward Tax Breaks and Spending Programs: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” George Washington University, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.American Political Science Review 103 (3): 387406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil, and Mo, Cecilia H.. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters' Evaluations of Government Performance.Proceedings of the Nataional Academy of Sciences 107 (1): 12804–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibbs, D.A. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D.A. 2000. “Bread and Peace Voting in US Presidential Elections.Public Choice 104 (1): 149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 2008. “Implications of the ‘Bread and Peace’ Model for the 2008 US Presidential Election.Public Choice 137: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., and Levendusky, Matthew S.. 2011. “Drafting Support for War: Conscription and Mass Support for Warfare.Journal of Politics 73 (2): 524–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William G. 2003. Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Taofang, and Shaw, Daron. 2009. “Beyond the Battlegrounds? Electoral College Strategies in the 2008 Presidential Election.Journal of Political Marketing 8 (4): 272–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudak, John. 2010. “The Politics of Federal Grants: Presidential Influence over the Distribution of Federal Funds.” Ph.D. diss. Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, Vol. 6. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1836. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karol, David, and Miguel, Edward. 2007. “The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election.Journal of Politics 69 (3): 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.American Political Science Review 65 (1): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-versus Individual-level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.American Political Science Review 77 (1): 92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Shen, Francis X.. 2007. “Iraq Casualties and the 2006 Senate Elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 507–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Shen, Francis X.. 2010. The Casualty Gap. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcinese, Valentino, Rizzo, Leonzio, and Testa, Cecilia. 2006. “Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President.Journal of Politics 68 (2): 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey, and Reilly, Shauna. 2010. “The Electoral Benefits of Distributive Spending.Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2000. “Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics.American Political Science Review 94 (1): 5972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2004. “Bicameralism and Geographic Politics: Allocating Funds in the House and Senate.Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 185213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate—The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S., Pope, Jeremy C., and Jackman, Simon D.. 2008. “Measuring District-level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections.Journal of Politics 70 (3): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven, and Poterba, James. 1999. “Congressional Distributive Politics and State Economic Performance.Public Choice 99 (1): 185216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S.D. and Snyder, J.M. Jr. 1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 958–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven, and Snyder, James M Jr. 1997. “The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes.Journal of Political Economy 105 (1): 3053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1985. “Pocketbook Voting in U.S. National Election Studies: Fact or Artifact?American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Nadeau, Richard, and Elias, Angelo. 2008. “Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data.American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 8495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 183219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M.S., and Tien, C.. 2008. “The Job of President and the Jobs Model Forecast: Obama for '08?PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (4): 687–90.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Kuo, A. 2008. “Attributing Blame: The Public's Response to Hurricane Katrina.Journal of Politics 70 (1): 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974a. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974b. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.Polity 6 (3): 295317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2000. “Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics.American Political Science Review 94 (1): 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.Journal of Law. Economics, and Organization 6 (4): 213–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Howell, William G. 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 132–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., Mutz, Diana C., and Huckfeldt, Robert. 1996. “Persuasion in Context: The Multilevel Structure of Economic Evaluations”. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change., eds. Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 249–66.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter. 1994. “A Normal Vote Approach to Electoral Change: Presidential Elections, 1828–1984.Political Behavior 16 (4): 467503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pittman, Craig. 2004. “Everglades Plan Leads to Campaign Battle in Swamp.” St. Petersburg Times, October 15.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L., Gorman, John, Phillips, Charles, and Smith, Jeffrey. 1976. “Comment: What Have You Done for Me Lately? Toward an Investment Theory of Voting.American Political Science Review 70 (3): 779805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr. and Whitten, Guy. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdum, Todd S. 1996. “President Signs a Bill to Restore the Everglades.” New York Times, October 12, 19.Google Scholar
Reeves, Andrew. 2011. “Political Disaster: Unilateral Powers, Electoral Incentives, and Presidential Disaster Declarations.Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Andrew, and Gimpel, James G.. 2012. “Ecologies of Unease: Geographic Context and National Economic Evaluations.Political Behavior 34 (2): 221–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton. 1960. The American Presidency. 2nd ed.Denver: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
Rucker, Philip. 2009. “S.C. Senator Is a Voice Of Reform Opposition: DeMint a Champion of Conservatives.” Washington Post, July 28.Google Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2002. Managing the President's Program: Presidential Leadership and Legislative Policy Formulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Thomas J. 2003. “Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions.American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 698713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, A. and LoStracco, F.. 2000. The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, Process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, P. 1997. “Fiscal Consistency and Federal District Spending in Congressional Elections.American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 1024–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron. 1999a. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.American Political Science Review 93 (2): 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron. 1999b. “The Methods behind the Madness: Presidential Electoral College Strategies, 1988–1996.Journal of Politics 61 (4): 893913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., Van Houweling, Robert P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Hanson, Peter C.. 2009. “The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics.American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 343–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidman, Andrew H., and Mak, Maxwell H.H.. 2006. “Pork, Awareness, and Ideological Consistency: The Effects of Distributive Benefits on Vote Choice.” John Jay College of Criminal Justice Typescript.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert. 1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.Journal of Politics 52 (1): 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert, and Bickers, Kenneth. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.Journal of Politics 56 (2): 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Christopher. 1988. “Ohio Edison Will Receive $20.6 Million in Federal Matching Grants.” State News Service, September 28.Google Scholar
Taylor, Andrew J. 2008. “The Presidential Pork Barrel and the Conditioning Effect of Term.Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (1): 96109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Andrew J. 2010. “Does Presidential Primary and Caucus Order affect Policy? Evidence from Federal Procurement Spending.Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 398409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Obama Cult. 2009. The Economist 392: 32.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham K. 1977. Special Interests and Policymaking: Agricultural Policies and Politics in Britain and the United States of America, 1956–1970. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 1974. “The Political Economy of New Deal Spending: An Econometric Analysis.Review of Economics and Statistics 56 (1): 3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *