Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:13:01.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of Newer County Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Charles M. Kneier*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes on Rural Local Government
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alabama, California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi (only for certain counties), Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. According to a bulletin published by the U. S. Bureau of Education in 1926, the number of libraries under county control having 3,000 volumes or over in 1923 was as follows: California, 38; Washington, 2; Oregon, 2; Wyoming, 12; Utah, 6; Montana, 7; Iowa, 1; Illinois, 1; Indiana, 8; Ohio, 5; Pennsylvania, 4; Massachusetts, 6 (law libraries); Connecticut, 2 (law libraries); New Jersey, 4; Maryland, 1; North Carolina, 1; South Carolina, 1; Tennessee, 1; Georgia, 1; Texas, 5. “Statistics of Public, Society, and School Libraries, 1923,” Bulletin, 1926, No. 9, United States Bureau of Education. Also see Hamilton, William J., “County Library Laws in the United States,” 45 Library Journal 727 (1920)Google Scholar; Long, Harriet C., County Library Service (1925)Google Scholar.

2 N. Y. Laws, 1872, ch. 733; 1901, ch. 103; Kerr's Consol. Laws of N. Y. Ann., ch. 42, sec. 30; Kerr's Codes of Calif., Pol. Code, sec. 4223.

3 Burns Ind. Stat., 1926, sec. 4363; Dyer, Walter A., “Putting Character into Counties,” 30 World's Work 604609 (1913)Google Scholar; Walter C. Nason, “Rural Hospitals,” U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Farmer's Bulletin, No. 1485.

4 Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri, Kansas, South Dakota, Colorado, Wyoming, Washington, Oregon, and Texas.

5 “Hospital Service in the United States,” Journal of the American Medical Association, March 30, 1929.

6 In a study published by the U. S. Department of Labor in 1928 the following thirty-three counties were listed as having county parks: Bergen, Camden, Essex, Hudson, and Union counties, New Jersey; Berkeley county, West Virginia; Clark and Grays Harbor counties, Washington; Clatsop county, Oregon; Cook and DuPage counties, Illinois; Erie and Westchester counties, New York; Guilford and Rockingham counties, North Carolina; Harris and Tarrant counties, Texas; Henry county, Indiana; Humboldt, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, and Santa Clara counties, California; Jackson, Muskegon, and Wayne counties, Michigan; Jackson county, Missouri; Marathon and Milwaukee counties, Wisconsin; Orange county, Florida; Pueblo county, Colorado; and Ramsay county, Minnesota. Converse county, Wyoming, had a park which was acquired by gift rather than purchase, as in the case of the other county parks listed above. Twelve other counties were reported as having parks in 1928, but the data were not sufficient to include in the report. Park Recreation Areas in the United States,” Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 462 (Washington, 1928)Google Scholar.

7 Pa. Stat. Complete to 1920, secs. 15, 822-15 ff.; Fla. Cum. Stat., 1925, ch. 32A.

8 Comp. Stat. of Neb., 1922, secs. 6812-16.

9 Pa. Stat., Supp., 1928, secs. 460—A1—A5; Public Acts Mich., 1927, p. 372 Google Scholar; Sess. Laws Wyo., 1927, p. 74 Google Scholar; Codes and Gen. Laws Calif., Supp. 1925-27, sec. 4056 c; Burns. Ind. Stat., 1926, vol. 2, secs. 3838 ff.Google Scholar; Public Laws N. C., 1929, p. 64 Google Scholar; Sess. Laws Idaho, 1929, ch. 106; Texas Laws, 1929, p. 614 Google Scholar.

10 Page's Ohio Code, vol. 1, sec. 4366-13; Laws of Wis., 1925, ch. 438; ibid., 1927, ch. 375; Publio Acts Mich., 1927, No. 260; Ill. Sess. Laws, 1929, p. 308 Google Scholar; Calif. Stat. and Amendments to the Codes, 1929, ch. 838.

11 5 City Planning 177 (1929)Google Scholar. DuPage county, Illinois; Glynn county, Georgia; Kenosha county, Wisconsin; Lucas county, Ohio; Santa Barbara county, California; and Wayne county, Michigan.

12 Comp. Laws of N. D., 1913, vol. 1, secs. 3471-3490Google Scholar. Amended at the special session of 1918.

13 Supp. Minn. Stat., 1917, sec. 745-4; Rev. Codes Mont., 1921, vol. 1, secs. 4640-4679Google Scholar; Laws of Kas., 1927, ch. 174.

14 Burritt, M. C., The County Agent and the Farm Bureau (New York, 1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lloyd, William A., “County Agricultural Agent Work under the Smith-Lever Act, 1914-1924,” U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Miso. Circular, No. 59 (1926)Google Scholar.

15 Supp. to Mo. Stat., 1927, p. 781 Google Scholar.

16 Rev. Stat. of Kas., 1923, sec. 2-601. Cf. Burns Ind. Stat., 1926, secs. 7045 ff.; Mason's Minn. Stat., 1927, vol. 1, sec. 668Google Scholar.

17 Abbott, GraceStandards of Rural Child Welfare,” Proceedings of 54th Annual Conference of Social Work, p. 30 (1927)Google Scholar.

18 Rev. Stat. of Kas., 1923, sec. 19-244 ff.

19 Laws of Wis., 1925, ch. 121.

20 The County Health Unit (Milbank Memorial Fund, 1927)Google Scholar.

21 Burris, Benjamin J., The County Unit System, How Organized and Administered (1924)Google Scholar; Butterworth, Julian E., “Types of Educational Control in the United States,” 15 Journal of Educational Research 349 (1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Gen. Laws Mass., 1921, ch. 77; Mason's Minn. Stat., 1927, sec. 8649; Rev. Stat. Mo., 1919, sec. 13802; Pa. Stat. Complete to 1920, sec. 13417.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.