Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T10:07:19.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contextual Determinants of Feminist Attitudes: National and Subnational Influences in Western Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Lee Ann Banaszak
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Eric Plutzer
Affiliation:
Iowa State University

Abstract

We augment the survey-based studies of attitudes toward feminism with comparative, contextual perspectives emphasizing the importance of social structure and culture. In doing so, we are able to assess the relative merits of two very different structural theories. Most researchers implicitly assume a simple linear effect of social context on attitudes. On the other hand, some early works on American conservatism suggest to us that status discontent may be a better explanation. We explicate these two approaches and derive a series of testable hypotheses for each. We then examine the validity of these theories utilizing data from nine European nations.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, Kristi, and Cook, Elizabeth. 1985. “Women, Work, and Political Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 29:606–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Leighley, Jan E.. 1991. “How Employment Affects Women's Gender Attitudes: The Work-place as a Locus of Contextual Effects.” Political Geography Quarterly 10:174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, and Plutzer, Eric. N.d. “The Social Bases of Feminism in the European Community.” Public Opinion Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Chafe, William. 1977. Women and Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Janet Saltzman, and Dworkin, Anthony Gary. 1986. Female Revolt: Women's Movements in World and Historical Perspective. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Gray, Virginia. 1983. Feminism and the New Right: Conflict over the American Family. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1986. “Is the New Women's Movement Dead? Decline or Change of the Danish Movement.” In The New Women's Movement, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy J., and Robinson, Robert. 1991. “Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality.” American Sociological Review 56:7284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1955. The Political Role of Women. Paris: UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 1984. Yearbook of Regional Statistics. Brussels: Statistical Office of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Gerson, Kathleen. 1987. “Emerging Social Divisions Among Women: Implications for Welfare State Policies.” Politics and Society 15:213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. Symbolic Crusade. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Guttentag, Marcia, and Secord, Paul F.. 1983. Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Himmelstein, Jerome L. 1986. “The Social Basis of Antifeminism: Religious Networks and Culture.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1963. “The Pseudo-Conservative Revolt–1955.” In The Radical Right, ed. Bell, Daniel. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Huber, Joan, and Spitze, Glenna. 1983. Sex Stratification: Children, Housework and Jobs. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1987. “The Diffusion of Consciousness in the United States and Western Europe.” In The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe, ed. Katzenstein, Mary and Mueller, Carol. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Lipman-Blumen, Jean. 1984. Gender Roles and Power. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mayer, Lawrence, and Smith, Roland E.. 1985. “Feminism and Religiosity: Female Electoral Behavior in Western Europe.” Western European Politics 8:3849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1987. Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in Western Democracies. Boulder: Rienner.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1988. “Work Life, Family Life, and Women's Support of Feminism.” American Sociological Review 53:640–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 1991. “Preferences in Family Politics: Women's Consciousness or Family Context?Political Geography Quarterly 10:162–73.Google Scholar
Powell, Brian, and Steelman, Lala Carr. 1982. “Testing an Untested Comparison: Maternal Effects on Sons' and Daughters' Attitudes Toward Women in the Labor Force.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 44:349–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabier, Jacques-Rene, Riffault, Helene, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1984. Euro-barometer 19: Gender Roles in the European Community. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom. 1985. “Working Wives and Women's Rights: The Connection Between the Employment Status of Wives and the Feminist Attitudes of Husbands.” Sex Roles 12:501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedin, Kent L., Brady, David W., Buxton, Mary E., Gorman, Barbara M., and Thompson, Judy L.. 1977. “Social Background and Political Differences Between Pro- and Anti-ERA Activists.” American Politics Quarterly 5:395408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingston, Herbert. 1963. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. Trans. Hammerlaing, V.. Totowa, NJ: Bedminister.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J. 1985. The Divorce Revolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1991. “The Causes and Consequences of Feminist Consciousness Among Western European Women.” Comparative Political Studies 23:519–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.