Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:35:48.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Boys to Men: Gender Politics and Jewish Identity in A Serious Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2011

Ariella Lang*
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York, New York
Get access

Extract

Like many of their films, the Coen brothers' A Serious Man at once portrays a society dominated by men and calls into question what it is to be a man, especially but not exclusively a Jewish man. Indeed, while Larry Gopnik's wife is the source of much of his trouble, she, like her unmanageable daughter and the seductress-neighbor—the only women characters in the film—occupies minimal space in the narrative. But the role of the female, or the characteristics that differentiate men from women, occupy maximal space in the narrative: They are incorporated throughout the film in Gopnik's behaviors, in parodies of those behaviors, and in stereotypes of Jewish men, and non-Jewish men for that matter, that have a lengthy history in American television and film and in Western, Christian culture more generally. And so we find the central irony of A Serious Man, which is the presence of the female restricted to an indirect “male” presence that articulates the problem of male Jewish identity as it is construed and challenged in the context of American suburban life.

Type
Symposium: A Serious Man
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Jewish Studies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Coen, Joel and Coen, Ethan, A Serious Man [script] (2007)Google Scholar, www.coenbrothers.net/scripts/aseriousman.pdf, p. 27.

2. Ibid.

3. As Freud writes, “ . . . for even in the nursery little boys hear that a Jew has something cut off his penis—a piece of his penis, they think—and this gives them a right to despise Jews.” Cited in Taylor, Gary, Castration: An Abbreviated History of Western Manhood (New York: Routledge, 2002), 135Google Scholar.

4. Berger, Maurice, “The Mouse That Never Roars: Jewish Masculinity on American Television,” Too Jewish? Challenging Traditional Identities, ed. Kleeblatt, Norman (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1996), 9798Google Scholar.

5. Bronski, Michael, “Danny Kaye,” Entertaining America: Jews, Movies and Broadcasting, ed. Hoberman, J. and Shandler, Jeffrey (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003), 180Google Scholar.

6. Gilman, Sander, Fat Boys: A Slim Book (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004), 38Google Scholar.

7. Ibid., 46.

9. Daniel, and Boyarin, Jonathan, “Tricksters, Martyrs, and Collaborators: Diaspora and the Gendered Politics of Resistance,” in Powers of Diaspora: Two Essays on the Relevance of Jewish Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002), 91Google Scholar.

10. One review of A Serious Man addressed the issue of Asian stereotypes as a larger subject for discussion in Ethan and Joel Coen's films: “One of the untalked about scandals in recent cinema has been the Coen brothers' perpetuation of negative Asian stereotypes: In The Big Lebowski, a “chinaman” peed on the Dude's rug, Fargo's most pathetic character was Mike Yanagita, and now A Serious Man portrays South Koreans as corrupt bullies.” While this issue lies outside the bounds of the current discussion, it points to the more general and very conscious act of stereotyping on the part of the filmmakers. See http://npinopunintended.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/oscarpalooza-a-serious-look-at-a-serious-man/.

12. As Boyarin suggests in his essay “Tricksters, Martyrs, and Collaborators,” “renunciation of the phallus was a means by which diasporic Jewish men could construct an identity for themselves that was different from that of the Christian communities in which they lived: “such a renunciation does not imply an exit from male sexuality entirely. It was the condition of not being imperial, of being diasporic . . . of demystifying the ‘phallus’ for what it is, a violent and destructive ideological construct,” Powers of Diaspora, 45–46.

13. For a discussion of these issues, see Prell, Riv-Ellen, “Postwar Suburban Debate,” in Imagining the American Jewish Community, ed. Wertheimer, Jack (Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, 2007), 6790Google Scholar.

14. Coen and Coen, www.coenbrothers.net/scripts/aseriousman.pdf, pp. 66–67.

15. Ibid., 68–69.

16. Ibid., 88.

17. Silverman, Kaja, Male Subjectivity at the Margins (New York: Routledge, 1992), 62Google Scholar.

18. Diaspora and Memory: Figures of Displacement in Contemporary Literature, Arts and Politics, ed. Baronian, Marie-Aude, Besser, Stephan, and Jansen, Yolande (New York: Editions Rodopi, 2007), 1112Google Scholar.