Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:33:30.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

STOL—Some Possibilities and Limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W. A. Mair*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Abstract

The Ninth Lanchester Memorial Lecture was given by Professor W. A. Mair, MA, FRAeS, on “STOL—Some Possibilities and Limitations” in the Society's Lecture Theatre on 12th May 1966. The Chair was taken by the President, Mr. A. D. Baxter, MEng, CEng, FRAeS. Before the lecture he presented the Society's Gold Medal for 1965 to Professor M. J. Lighthill, DSc, FRS, FRAeS, for “his outstanding original work in many fields of Aeronautics”, explaining that Professor Lighthill had been unable to be present at the Wilbur and Orville Wright Memorial Lecture in December 1965 when the Society's main awards for the year were presented.

The President then said that this was the first meeting of the Society since his installation as President and it was a very pleasant way to start his year in office with first, the presentation of the Gold Medal to one distinguished scientist and second, the introduction of another as the Lanchester Memorial Lecturer.

There would be many members of the Society who would remember Dr. Lanchester, his attendance at lectures and his contributions to the discussions. It was true, however, that the real stature of such men was rarely recognised at close quarters and often only in the light of later developments was the importance of their work realised. It was 20 years since Dr. Lanchester's death and their Memorial Lecture was in its ninth year. Each year, each President had added a tribute to this great man. He was a man of many parts—a scientist, musician, poet and engineer and aeronautics owed much to him. It was fitting that the Lecture had established a tradition of surveying some field of research associated with aerodynamics, in which Lanchester was so eminent. He thought that Lanchester would approve of both the subjects discussed and the distinguished men who had honoured his memory by presenting them. Before introducing Professor Mair he wished to welcome Mrs. Lanchester and Mr. George Lanchester and his wife, and Mrs. Mair.

Professor Mair must be well known to most of them. After graduating in Mechanical Sciences at Cambridge in 1939 he had joined the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough, where he scent some six years in the Aerodynamics Department doing research on high subsonic speed, both in the wind tunnels and in full-scale flight. In 1946 he had gone to the University of Manchester as Director of the Fluid Motion Laboratory and since 1952 he had held the Francis Mond Chair of Aeronautical Engineering at Cambridge. His chief interest there had been mainly in low speed aerodynamics and his authority in that field was widely recognised. In 1963 he had been appointed Chairman of the Powered Lift Committee of the Aeronautical Research Council.

Type
Ninth Lanchester Memorial Lecture
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Woods, L. C.The Theory of Subsonic Plane Flow. Cambridge University Press, pp. 316323, 1961.Google Scholar
2.Keune, F. Lift on a Bent Flat Plate. NACA Tech Memo 1340, 1955.Google Scholar
3.Head, M. R. and Clark, D. G. Flight Experiments on Suction for High Lift. AIAA Paper No. 65-750, AIAA/ RAeS/JSASS Aircraft Design and Technology Meeting, Los Angeles, November 1965.Google Scholar
4.Thompson, B. G. J. The Calculation of Shape Factor Development in Incompressible Turbulent Boundary Layers With or Without Transpiration. AGARDograph 97, pp. 159191, 1965.Google Scholar
5.Williams, J. and Butler, S. F. J.Aerodynamic Aspects of Boundary Layer Control for High Lift at Low Speeds. J Roy Aero Soc, Vol. 67, pp. 201223. 1963.Google Scholar
6.Schlichting, H. and Das, A. Aerodynamische Probleme der Flugzeuge mit kurzer Start-und Landestrecke. DFL Bericht 167, Braunschweig, 1961.Google Scholar
7.Wimpress, J. K.Short Take-off and Landing for the High Speed Aircraft. Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 4, pp. 4049, 1966.Google Scholar
8.Davidson, I. M.The Jet Flap. J Roy Aero Soc, Vol. 60, pp. 2541, 1956.Google Scholar
9.Davidson, I. M.Some Engineering Problems of the Jet Flap. Boundary Layer and Flow Control (ed. Lachmann, G. V.), Pergamon Press, Vol. 1, pp. 568591, 1961.Google Scholar
10.Cone, C. D. A Theoretical Investigation of Vortex-sheet Deformation Behind a Highly Loaded Wing and Its Effect on Lift. NASA TN D-657, 1961.Google Scholar
11.Maskell, E. C. and Spence, D. A.A Theory of the Jet Flap in Three Dimensions. Proc Roy Soc A, Vol. 251, pp. 407425, 1959.Google Scholar
12.Gratzer, L. B. and O'Donnell, T. J.The Development of a BLC High-lift System for High-speed Airplanes. AIAA Paper No. 64-589, AIAA Transport Aircraft Design and Operations Meeting, Seattle, August 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Young, A. D. A Note on Ground Effect on the Lift Due to a Jet Flap. Aero Res Coun 19, 971, 1958.Google Scholar
14.Sutcliffe, P. L., Merrick, V. K. and Howell, A. R.Aerodynamic and Propulsion Considerations of Minimum-field Aircraft. Paper Presented at 8th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, London, 1961.Google Scholar
15.Mair, W. A. and Edwards, B. J. A Parametric Study of Take-off and Landing Distances for High-lift Aircraft. Aero Res Council Current Paper 823, 1965.Google Scholar