Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:45:04.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Advances in Parachute Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D.R. Dennis
D.R. Dennis*
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, Hants
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To the layman the parachute is often no more than a large pocket handkerchief which brings men safely to earth without a bump, but to the aeronautical engineer it is a complex aerodynamic decelerator, which has a large number of degrees of freedom and dynamic characteristics which are often difficult to account for by classical aerodynamic theory. Whichever view one may care to take of the parachute what is certain is that advances in parachute technology are nearly always the result of a balanced programme of both theoretical and experimental work, and for this reason equal attention will be given in this paper to both the experimental and theoretical aspects of parachute technology.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 87 , Issue 869 , November 1983 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1983 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dennis, D. R. An air-launched test vehicle for ejection seat parachutes. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SAFE symposium. 227–23 Canoya Park, California SAFE, 1977.Google Scholar
2. Key, E. and Barker, D. Development and flight trials of an air-launched vehicle for testing emergency escape parachutes. RAE Technical Report 79042, April 1979.Google Scholar
3. Heinrich, H. G. Theory and experiment on parachute opening shock and filling time. Symposium on Parachutes. Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 1971.Google Scholar
4. Roberts, B. W. The aerodynamic inflation of shell-type structures with particular reference to parachutes. Symposium on Parachutes. Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Lingard, J. S. A semi-empirical theory to predict the load-time history of an inflating parachute. RAE Technical Report TR 79141. November 1979.Google Scholar
6. Webb, D. B. Further test results of parachutes with automatic inflation modulation (AIM). Proceedings of the 18th SAFE symposium 1980.Google Scholar
7. Johns, T. F. Parachute Design, R&M 2402, HMSO 1951.Google Scholar
8. Ewing, E. G., Bixby, H. W. and Knacke, T. W. Recovery system design guide, Report AFFDL-TR-78-1511978, National Technical Information Service, USA.Google Scholar
9. Reynolds, R. T. and Mullins, W. M. Stress analysis of ribbon parachutes. AIAA paper No. 75-1372, November 1975.Google Scholar
10. Braun, G. and Doherr, K. F. Experiments with Omega Sensors for measuring stress in Parachute Canopies. AIAA paper 79-0435 presented at AIAA 6th Aerodynamic Decelerator Conference, March 1979.Google Scholar
11. Pepper, W. B. Evaluation of Kevlar 29 vs Nylon for 12.5 ft diameter ribbon parachutes. Journal of Aircraft, USA. 1979, 17, 3 Google Scholar
12. Jorgensen, D. S. and Cockrell, D. J. The effects of drive slots on parachute performance, Journal of Aircraft, June 1981, 18, 6.Google Scholar
13. Lingard, J. S. The performance and design of ram air gliding parachutes. RAE Technical Report TR 81103, August 1981.Google Scholar