No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Performance analysis of power conditioning and distribution module for microsatellite applications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 May 2024
Abstract
Algeria’s micro-satellite, Alsat-1b, was successfully launched into a 680 km low Earth orbit onboard a PSLV-C35 rocket from Sriharikota, South India, on September 26, 2016. The spacecraft was conceived, built and launched as part of an 18-month technology transfer programme between Algeria’s Algerian Space Agency (ASAL) and the United Kingdom’s Surrey Satellite Technology Limited (SSTL). This document details the Power Conditioning and Distribution Module’s (PCM-PDM) design and performance in orbit, critical component of a satellite electrical power system, responsible for converting, regulating and distributing power to various subsystems and payloads. The PCM-PDM developed and produced by SSTL was subjected to rigorous testing simulating harsh space conditions to assess its performance. The results of this comprehensive analysis indicate that the module can effectively withstand extreme environmental factors and function optimally in challenging settings. The analysis focused on the PCM-PDM’s ability to provide reliable and efficient power conditioning and distribution to the satellite, including its load management capabilities, overcurrent protection, protection against undervoltage and critical mode operations. The results of the performance analysis showed that the PCM-PDM met the required specifications and demonstrated reliable and efficient operation in different modes of the satellite’s mission. The study highlights the importance of careful design and rigorous testing of the PCM-PDM to ensure the reliable and efficient operation of the satellite and its payloads.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
References
Bettencourt, J.C. and Stengel, R.B. Power conditioning and switching for small satellites. Published in the J. Aerosp. Eng., 2021, 3, pp 36–52.Google Scholar
King, R.W.P. and Beach, G.W. An overview of power switching and conditioning circuits for small satellites. Published in the J. Aerosp. Eng., 2021, 3, pp 41–56.Google Scholar
Patel, M.R. and Beik, O. Spacecraft Power Systems, 2nd ed., CRC Press, 2023. ISBN: 9781003804215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, P.X., Fang, J.Y. and Zhang, T.X. Power switching and conditioning circuit design for microsatellites. Published in the J. Aerosp. Eng., 2018, 2, pp 21–38.Google Scholar
Williams, T. The Circuit Designers Companion, 2nd ed.: Newnes, 2004. ISBN: 9780080476513.Google Scholar
Bensaada, M., Mebrek, M.A. and Schofield, D. Power system design and performance for low earth orbit spacecraft. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag., 2022, 37, (1), pp 44–58. doi: 10.1109/MAES.2021.3117356
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekhti, M., Bensaada, M. and Beldjehem, M. Design and implementation of a power distribution system adopting overcurrent protection. Aeronaut. J., 2020, 124, (1281). ISSN: 0001-9240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, J., Gonzalez, R. and San Martin, E. Flyback converter design for high-density power supplies. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2010, 25, (4), pp 969–978.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J., Gonzalez, R. and San Martin, E. High-efficiency Flyback converters for portable applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2015, 3, (4), pp 754–764.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. and Gonzalez, R. Flyback converter design for low-power applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2016, 4, (2), pp 593–604.Google Scholar
Lee, J.W., A compact current-controlled foldback power limiter with enhanced load-current monitoring capability. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, 2021, 68, (5), pp 489–493.Google Scholar
Tan, T.K. A high-efficiency current-mode foldback regulator with output current limiting. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2019, 34, (4), pp 3636–3645.Google Scholar
Kim, S.H. and Kim, Y.W. Design of foldback current limiter with output current monitoring circuit. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci., 2018, 18, (1), pp 47–53.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.Q., Zhang, Y.X. and Liu, Z.Q. Design and analysis of foldback current limiter based on adaptive hysteresis control. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., 2016, 30, (9), pp 1075–1086.Google Scholar
Bhatia, M.K., Chugh, K.K. and Grewal, S.S. A high efficiency foldback current limiter for dc-dc converters. J. Power Electron., 2015, 15, (5), pp 962–970.Google Scholar
Lee, J.K. A novel Timed Current Latch (TCL) regulator with foldback current limiting. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 2003, 38, (2), pp 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X. and Su, H.J. A simple and high-efficiency timed current latch power supply with foldback current limiter. J. Power Electron., 2006, 6, (4), pp 392–401.Google Scholar
Wang, L.X. and Liu, Y.X. A novel timed current latch regulator with adaptive on-time control. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., 2008, 22, (14), pp 1915–1924.Google Scholar
Du, J.L. and Yin, X.Y. A timed current latch regulator with dual mode control for switching power supplies. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., 2011, 25, (7–8), pp 1037–1046.Google Scholar
Joffe, E.B. and Lock, K.-S. Grounds for Grounding: A Circuit-to-System Handbook. 1st ed., IEEE, 2010. ISBN 978-0471-66008-8.Google Scholar
Electrical grounding architecture for unmanned spacecraft, NASA TECHNICAL HANDBOOK, NASA–HDBK-4001, February 17, 1998.Google Scholar
Boncyk, W.C. Developing a distributed power and grounding architecture for PnPSat. 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 01-08 March 2008, IEEE, Big Sky, MT, USA. doi:10.1109/AERO.2008.4526506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.A. and Liu, Y.Y. Grounding and Isolation in Spacecraft Electric Power Systems: Publisher Springer, Vol. 4, 2015, pp 15–28.Google Scholar