Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T22:32:23.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II. The Flattening of Monocoque Cylinders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Extract

It is known from both theoretical and experimental investigations that St. Venant's assumption on the constancy of the shape of the cross section of girders in pure bending does not hold true in case of thin-walled sections. The greater flexibility than calculated according to ordinary bending theory of initially curved tubes, as experimentally found by Professor Bantlin, was perfectly explained by Professor von Kármán in 1911 on the assumption of a flattening of the section.

In 1927 Brazier with the aid of the variational method determined exactly that the shape of an originally circular thin-walled bent cylinder corresponding to the least potential energy is quasi elliptical and that the cross section of the cylinder, therefore, must flatten, even if the centre line of the cylinder was originally straight. In consequence of the flattening St. Venant's linear law for the curvature loses its validity and the curvature increases more rapidly than the bending moment. For a certain value of the curvature the bending moment is a maximum, and after this value was reached the curvature increases even if the applied moment remains unchanged or decreases, fulfilling thereby the criterion of instability. This instability occurs when the rate of flattening, i.e., the maximum radial displacement of any point of the circumference of the tube divided by the original radius of the tube, will equal 2/9.

Type
Instability of Monocoque Structures in Pure Bending
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

20 V. Ref. 4.

21 V. Ref. 11. Cf. also p. 70 of Ref. 5.

22 V. Ref. 1.

23 The very small term representing St. Venant's displacement in Brazier's calculations has been neglected.

24 The longitudinal (axial) displacement is much smaller and may, therefore, be neglected, as it will be shown later.

25 V. p. 5 of Ref. 1.

26 This notation has been introduced for getting results in a convenient form in the following paragraphs. Consequently the moment of inertia of the ring is given by the product .

27 Cf. footnote 26.

28 Cf. Ref. 6 and Ref 12.

29 V. p. 462 of Ref. 22.

30 V. Ref. 15. Cf. also p. 466 of Ref. 22.

31 V. Ref. 6.

32 V. Ref. 12.

33 V. Ref. 17.

34 ϕ is a constant for a stringer.