Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T19:06:44.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated air data sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. A. Menzies
M. A. Menzies*
Affiliation:
Avionics Specialties Incorporated , Charlottesville , Virginia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Avionics Specialties in partnership with Honeywell has developed an integrated air data pressure sensor known as the integrated multi-function probe (IMFP). This continuously flow-aligned pressure-sensing device was developed using a multidisciplinary design approach encompassing computational fluid dynamic, (CFD), flow analysis, and experimentation. The computational investigation was performed using the finite element code, CFDesign, by Blue Ridge Numerics and consisted of pressure distribution studies for varying flows around conical sections. The application and integration of this technology to previously developed flow alignment and pressure transducing products lead to design similarity analysis saving considerable development time. Initial experimentation used to develop and refine the design and analysis consisted of laboratory bench testing, low and high-speed wind tunnel investigations, and subsonic flight-testing. Final performance verification was accomplished through data reduction and analysis of an extensive flight test program using a Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon. The analysis, design and performance verification of this innovative pressure-sensing device was investigated for direct comparison to conventional Pitot-static performance with particular emphasis toward military fighter aircraft applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 105 , Issue 1046 , April 2001 , pp. 223 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2001 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Huston, W.B. Accuracy of airspeed measurements and flight calibration procedures, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Report Number 919, Langley Field, Virginia, 1946, pp 499–534.Google Scholar
2. Coulthard, W.H. Aircraft Instrument Design, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Bath, 1952, pp 62–72.Google Scholar
3. Howard, W. Reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM), Airliner, Jul-Sep Issue, 1996, pp 8–15.Google Scholar
4. Gowen, F.E. and Perkins, E.W. Drag of circular cylinders for a wide range of Reynolds numbers and Mach numbers, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Technical Note 2960, Moffett Field, California, 1953.Google Scholar
5. Menzies, M.A. Development and design of the multifunction probe-a summary of F-16 flight test data, Avionics Specialties Research Report, 1998.Google Scholar
6. Menzies, M.A. Icing tunnel test F-16 to MFP comparison, Avionics Specialties Test Report, conducted at LeCleric Icing Wind Tunnel, New York, 1998. 1.Google Scholar
7. Baltins, G.U., Boyle, R.W., Mason, D.G., Moore, H.M., Debow Owen, A. and Sharp, J.A. Combined aircraft angle of attack and dynamic/static pressure sensor assembly, United States Patent, 5,544,526, Avionics Specialties Inc, 13 August 1996.Google Scholar
8. Menzies, M.A., Baltins, G.U. and Martin, D.N. Improvements to multifunction aircraft probes, United States Patent, 6,012,331, Avionics Specialties Inc, 2 July 1998.Google Scholar
9. Menzies, M.A. and Baltins, G.U. Aircraft probe with integral air temperature sensor, United States Patent, 6,076,963, Avionics Specialties Inc, 29 September 1998.Google Scholar