Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:56:23.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of ring size on the side force over ogive-cylinder body at subsonic speed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

P. Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Space Engineering and Rocketry, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
J.K. Prasad
Affiliation:
Department of Space Engineering and Rocketry, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

Experiments and computations have been made to obtain the details of the flow field over a slender body at high angles of attack at a freestream velocity of 17 m/s corresponding to a Reynolds number of 2.9×104 based on the base diameter. Experiments indicated that the existence of side force at higher angles of attack is mainly due to the presence of asymmetric vortices in the leeward side. A rectangular cross-section circular ring placed at an axial distance of 3.5 times the base diameter reduced the side force at all the angles of attack. Investigations were made to obtain the effect of the height of the ring at an angle-of-attack of 50° where the side force experienced is relatively large. A ring placed at a distance of 3.5 times the base diameter alters the initial vortices and hence helps in substantial reduction of the side force. Studies with rings of different heights indicate that a ring having a height of 3% of the local diameter reduced the side force at almost all the angles of attack for the present flow conditions and provided the least disturbance to the lift and drag of the body.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, H.J. and Perkins, E.W. Characteristics of flow over inclined bodies of revolution, NACA RM A50L07, 1951.Google Scholar
2. Lamont, P. J. and HUNT, B. L. Prediction of aerodynamic out-of-plane forces on ogive-nosed circular cylinder, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 1977, 14, (1), pp 3844.Google Scholar
3. Lamont, P.J. Pressures around an inclined ogive-cylinder with laminar, transitional, or turbulent separation, AIAA J, 1982, 20, (11), pp 14921499.Google Scholar
4. Lamont, P.J. and Hunt, B.L. Pressure and force distributions on a sharp-nosed circular cylinder at large angles of inclination to a uniform subsonic stream, J Fluid Mechanics, 1976, 76, (3), pp 519599.Google Scholar
5. Zilliac, G.G., Degani, D. and Tobak, M. Asymmetric vortices on slender body of revolution, AIAA J, 1991, 29, (5), pp 667675.Google Scholar
6. Keener, E.R., Chapman, G.T., Cohen, L. and TALEGHANI, J. Side force on a tangent ogive forebody with fineness ratio of 3.5 at high angles of attack and Mach numbers from 0.1 to 0.7, NASA TM X-3437, February 1977.Google Scholar
7. Bridges, D.H. The asymmetric vortex wake problem - asking the right question, AIAA Paper 2006-3553, June 2006.Google Scholar
8. Degani, D. and Schiff, L.B. Numerical simulation of the effect of spatial disturbances on vortex asymmetry, AIAA J, 1990, 29, (3), pp 344352.Google Scholar
9. Cummings, M.R., Forsythe, J.R. and Squires, K.D. Computational challenges in high angle-of-attack flow prediction, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2003, 39, (5), pp 369384.Google Scholar
10. Levy, Y., Hesselink, L. and Degani, D. Systematic study of the correlation geometrical disturbances and flow asymmetries. AIAA J, 1996, 34, (4), 772777.Google Scholar
11. Degani, D. and Levy, Y. Asymmetric turbulent vortical flows over slender bodies, AIAA J, 1992, 30, (9), pp 22672273.Google Scholar
12. Rao, D.M. Side-force alleviation on slender, pointed forebodies at high angles of attack, AIAA Paper 78-1339, 1978.Google Scholar
13. Luo, S.C., Lim, T.T., Lua, K.B., Chia, H.T., Goh, E.K.R. and Ho, Q.W. Flowfield around ogive/elliptic-tip cylinder at high angle of attack, AIAA J, 1998, 36, (10), pp 17781787.Google Scholar
14. Lua, K.B., Lim, T.T., Luo, S.C. and Goh, E.K.R. Helical-groove and circular-trip effects on side force, J Aircraft, September-October 2000, 37, (5), pp 906915.Google Scholar
15. Kumar, R., Viswanath, P.R. and Ramesh, O.N. Nose bluntness for side force control on circular cones at high incidence, J Aircraft, 2005, 42, (5), pp 11331141.Google Scholar
16. Cui, Y.D. and Tsai, H.M. Side force suppression by dimples on ogive-cylinder body at high angles of attack, AIAA 2008-368, January 2008.Google Scholar
17. Deng, X.Y., Tian, W. and Wang, Y.K. Recent progress on the study of asymmetric vortex flow over slender bodies, Acta Mechanica Sinica, September 2008, 24, pp 475487.Google Scholar
18. Kumar, P. and Prasad, J.K. Mechanism of side force generation and its alleviation over a slender body, J Spacecraft and Rockets, January-February 2016, 53, (1), pp 195208.Google Scholar
19. Ma, B.F. and Liu, T.X. Low-frequency vortex oscillation around slender bodies at high angles of attack, Physics of Fluids, September 2014, 26, 091701.Google Scholar
20. Ramberg, S.E. The effects of yaw and finite length upon the vortex wakes of stationary and vibrating circular cylinders, J Fluid Mechanics, March 1983, 128, pp 81107.Google Scholar
21. Yeo, D.H. and Jones, N.P. Investigation on 3-D characteristics of flow around a yawed and inclined circular cylinder, J Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96, 10–11, 2008, pp 19471960.Google Scholar