Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:56:40.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distributed fixed-time control for six-degree-of-freedom spacecraft formation with event-triggered observer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2023

J. Zhang Open the ORCID record for J. Zhang [Opens in a new window] ,
H. Xia Open the ORCID record for H. Xia [Opens in a new window]  and
Z. Li
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Space Control and Inertial Technology Research Center, School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
H. Xia*
Affiliation:
Space Control and Inertial Technology Research Center, School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Z. Li
Affiliation:
Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology Institute, Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology, Shanghai, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: hxia@hit.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper addresses the six-degree-of-freedom coupled control problem for spacecraft formation flying subject to actuator saturation and input quantisation whilst considering limited communication resources. Firstly, a novel event-triggered distributed observer without continuous communications is presented to recover the information of the virtual leader. Remarkably, by embedding a hyperbolic tangent function-based nonlinear term into the triggering condition, the event-based observer realises a more reasonable trigger threshold. Subsequently, an adding-a-power-integrator-based fixed-time control algorithm is proposed for the follower spacecraft. Further, the control scheme ingeniously compensates for the actuator saturation and the input quantisation problems without embedding auxiliary systems. Finally, numerical simulations are carried out to highlight the advantages of the theoretical results.

Keywords

6-DOF leader-following spacecraft formationEvent-triggered fixed-time observerFixed-time controlActuator saturation and input quantisation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 127 , Issue 1317 , November 2023 , pp. 1968 - 1992
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mauro, G., Spiller, D., Bevilacqua, R. and D’Amico, S. Spacecraft formation flying reconfiguration with extended and impulsive maneuvers, J. Franklin Inst., 2019, 356, (6), pp 3474–3507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, G.B., Miller, D.W. and Hastings, D.E. Generalized characteristics of communication, sensing, and navigation satellite systems, J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2000, 37, (6), pp 801–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, W. and Beard, R.W. Decentralized scheme for spacecraft formation flying via the virtual structure approach, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2004, 27, (1), pp 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, C. and Kim, Y. Point targeting of multisatellites via a virtual structure formation flight scheme, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2009, 32, (4), pp 1330–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiakang, Z.H.O.U., Guangfu, M.A. and Qinglei, H.U. Delay depending decentralized adaptive attitude synchronization tracking control of spacecraft formation, Chinese J. Aeronaut., 2012, 25, (3), pp 406–415.Google Scholar
Wu, B., Wang, D. and Poh, E.K. Decentralized sliding-mode control for spacecraft attitude synchronization under actuator failures, Acta Astronaut., 2014, 105, (1), pp 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Hu, Q. and Friswell, M.I. Decentralized finite time attitude synchronization control of satellite formation flying, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2013, 36, (1), pp 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, A. and Kumar, K.D. Distributed attitude coordination control for spacecraft formation flying, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2012, 48, (2), pp 1329–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, A., de Ruiter, A.H.J. and Kumar, K.D. Distributed finite-time velocity-free attitude coordination control for spacecraft formations, Automatica, 2016, 67, pp 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyakov, A. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2012, 57, (8), pp 2106–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, W. Formation keeping and attitude alignment for multiple spacecraft through local interactions, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2007, 30, (2), pp 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, G.A.O., Yuanqing, X.I.A., Zhang, X. and Zhang, G. Distributed fixed-time attitude coordinated control for multiple spacecraft with actuator saturation, Chinese J. Aeronaut., 2022, 35, (4), pp 292–302.Google Scholar
Tabuada, P. Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2007, 52, (9), pp 1680–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimarogonas, D.V., Frazzoli, E. and Johansson, K.H. Distributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems, IEEE Tran. Autom. Control, 2012, 57, (5), pp 1291–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E. and Cortés, J. Event-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus, Automatica, 2019, 105, pp 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, E., Cao, Y. and Casbeer, D.W. Periodic event-triggered synchronization of linear multi-agent systems with communication delays, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2017, 62, (1), pp 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, Y. and Sun, C. Fixed-time event-triggered consensus for nonlinear multiagent systems without continuous communications, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 2019, 49, (11), pp 2221–2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proskurnikov, A.V. and Mazo, M. Lyapunov event-triggered stabilization with a known convergence rate, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2020, 65, (2), pp 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Biggs, J.D., Ye, D. and Sun, Z. Extended-state-observer-based event-triggered orbit-attitude tracking for low-thrust spacecraft, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2020, 56, (4), pp 2872–2883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di, F., Li, A., Guo, Y., Xie, C. and Wang, C. Event-triggered sliding mode attitude coordinated control for spacecraft formation flying system with disturbances, Acta Astronaut., 2021, 188, pp 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Wen, C. and Yang, G. Adaptive backstepping stabilization of nonlinear uncertain systems with quantized input signal, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2014, 59, (2), pp 460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Wang, F., Zhang, Y. and Chen, C.L.P. Fuzzy adaptive quantized control for a class of stochastic nonlinear uncertain systems, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 2016, 46, (2), pp 524–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Q. and Xiao, B. Intelligent proportional-derivative control for flexible spacecraft attitude stabilization with unknown input saturation, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2012, 23, (1), pp 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, H., Liu, J., Wang, C. and Wu, L. Approximate back-stepping fault-tolerant control of the flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 2016, 21, (3), pp 1680–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mauro, G., Lawn, M. and Bevilacqua, R. Survey on guidance navigation and control requirements for spacecraft formation-flying missions, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2018, 41, (3), pp 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Q., Shi, Y. and Shao, X. Adaptive fault-tolerant attitude control for satellite reorientation under input saturation, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, 78, pp 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyakov, A. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2011, 57, (8), pp 2106–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, A. and Kumar, K.D. Finite-time attitude control for rigid spacecraft subject to actuator saturation, Nonlinear Dyn., 2019, 96, (2), pp 1017–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, S., Yu, X., Shirinzadeh, B. and Man, Z. Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode, Automatica, 2005, 41, (11), pp 1957–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, C. and Lin, W. A continuous feedback approach to global strong stabilization of nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2001, 46, (7), pp 1061–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C., Yu, X. and Man, Z. Terminal sliding mode observers for a class of nonlinear systems, Automatica, 2010, 46, (8), pp 1401–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Liu, K. and Han, D. Adaptive sliding mode control for six-dof relative motion of spacecraft with input constraint, Acta Astronaut., 2013, 87, pp 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploen, S.R., Hadaegh, F.Y. and Scharf, D.P. Rigid body equations of motion for modeling and control of spacecraft formations. part 1: Absolute equations of motion. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference, volume 4, pages 3646–3653, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A.J., Hurtado, J.E. and Junkins, J.L. Application of the cayley form to general spacecraft motion, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2006, 29, (2), pp 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y., Hu, J. and Gao, L. Tracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology, Automatica, 2006, 42, (7), pp 1177–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z., Zhou, D., Shi, X., Li, R. and Kan, B. Prescribed performance fixed-time tracking control for a class of second-order nonlinear systems with disturbances and actuator saturation, Int. J. Control, 2021, 94, (1), pp 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kun, Y.A.N., Mou, C.H.E.N., Qingxian, W.U. and Ronggang, Z.H.U. Robust adaptive compensation control for unmanned autonomous helicopter with input saturation and actuator faults, Chinese J. Aeronaut., 2019, 32, (10), pp 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Shi, X., Zhou, Z., Zhou, D., Li, R. and Chen, X. Observer-based event-triggered fixed-time control for nonlinear system with full-state constraints and input saturation, Int. J. Control, 2022, 95, (2), pp 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Wang, C. and Wang, W. Adaptive quantized attitude control for spacecraft with input saturation. In 2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), pages 449–454, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, R., Chen, X., Liu, M. and Cao, X. Attitude-orbit coupled sliding mode tracking control for spacecraft formation with event-triggered transmission, ISA Trans., 2020, 6, 338–348.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. and Li, F. Adaptive finite-time control for six-degree-of-freedom leader-following spacecraft formation using twistors, Adv. Space Res., 2022, 70, (5), pp 1297–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar