Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T04:22:11.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and Future Potential of Maraging Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. G. Haynes
A. G. Haynes*
Affiliation:
International Nickel Limited
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Conventional low-alloy steels at strengths above 100 ton/in2 have been successfully used in various aerospace applications, but laboratory test results, service-performance data and problems in production indicated a need for steels which possessed improved mechanical properties, and which were simpler to machine and fabricate. The 18% Ni-Co-Mo maraging steels were developed in 1961 with the aim of fulfilling this need, and since that date several thousand tons of the steels have been produced and used in all common shapes and forms. In comparison with low-alloy steels of equivalent strength, 18% nickel maraging steels have greater resistance to fracture at highly-stressed notches, defects or cracks, and their susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement/stress-corrosion failure is generally far superior. The un-notched rotating bend fatigue properties of machined and mar aged specimens of 18% Ni-Co-Mo maraging steels tend to be superior in the low-cycle range and similar in the low-stress range to the properties of low-alloy steels of comparable strength. The fatigue properties of unnotched, in contrast to those of notched, specimens are affected by heat-treatment/machining procedure. Experience gained in production of components has proved that the 18% nickel maraging steels are extremely simple to heat treat, to machine, to cold form and to weld. Exploitation of these advantages can frequently offset the higher initial cost of maraging steel. For example, an analysis of production costs for a complex aircraft component has demonstrated that the use of maraging steel enabled the component to be made by forging and machining at 5-20% lower cost than with a conventional low-alloy steel, despite the fact that initial material costs were five times greater. 18% Ni-Co-Mo maraging steels retain high strength at temperatures up to 350-400°C, and have given good service in short-duration heating cycles at much higher temperatures. Maraging steels may be surface hardened by various methods, and gears and dies treated by simultaneous nitriding and maraging have given excellent performance.

The tremendous technological efforts which have been made in the past five years have yielded the majority of data and experience necessary to ensure successful use of the 18% Ni-Co-Mo maraging steels in the aerospace industry.

Type
Metallic Materials
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 668 , August 1966 , pp. 766 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bieber, C. G.Creative Metallurgy. ASM Metals Engg Quarterly, Vol 1, pp 92–108, November 1961.Google Scholar
2.Decker, R. F., Eash, J. T. and Goldman, A. J. 18% Maraging Steel. ASM Trans Quarterly, Vol. 55, pp 58–76, March 1962.Google Scholar
3.Floreen, S. and Decker, R. F.Heat-Treatment of 18% Ni Maraging Steel. Trans ASM, Vol 55, pp 518–530, 1962.Google Scholar
4.Fracture Testing of High-Strength Sheet Materials: A Report of a Special ASTM Committee. ASTM Bull, No 243, pp 29–40, January 1960; No. 244, pp 18-28, Feb. 1960. The Slow Growth and Rapid Propagation of Cracks: ASTM Materials Research and Standards, Vol 1, pp 389–393, 1961;Google Scholar
Fracture Testing of High-Strength Sheet Materials. Ibid, pp 877–885;Google Scholar
Screening Tests for High-Strength Alloys Using Sharply Notched Cylindrical Specimens. Ibid, Vol 2, pp 196–203, 1962;Google Scholar
Progress in Measuring Fracture Toughness and Using Fracture Mechanics. Ibid, Vol 4, pp 107–119, 1964.Google Scholar
5.Haynes, A. G. Maraging Steels—Surface Protection and Surface Effects. Metallurgical Developments in High-Alloy Steels. Iron and Steel Inst Special Rept No 86, pp 125–133, 1964.Google Scholar
6.Dean, S. and Copson, H. R.Stress Corrosion Behaviour of Maraging Nickel Steels in Natural Environments. Corrosion, Vol 21, pp 95–103, 1965.Google Scholar
7.Steven, W. Maraging Steels. Metallurgical Developments in High-Alloy Steels. Iron and Steel Inst Special Rept No 86, pp 113–124, 1964.Google Scholar
8.Haynes, A. G.To be published.Google Scholar
9.Fowler, E. L.Machining a Maraging Steel. American Machinist, Vol 106, pp 145–147, 1962.Google Scholar
10.Fowler, E. L. and McAuliffe, I. F.Machining the 18% Nickel Maraging Steels. Metalworking Production, Vol 109, pp 54–59, 3rd February 1965.Google Scholar
11.Haynes, A. G. and Fielding, J.To be published.Google Scholar
12.Seabrook, J. B.Working with Maraging Steels: Nitriding. Metal Progress, Vol 84, pp 78–80, July 1963.Google Scholar