Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T04:54:41.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of wavy leading edge to enhance winglet aerodynamic performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2023

J.A. Flores-Mezarina
Affiliation:
São Carlos Engineering School - University of São Paulo, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, São Carlos, Brazil
P.D. Bravo-Mosquera
Affiliation:
São Carlos Engineering School - University of São Paulo, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, São Carlos, Brazil
D. Garcia-Ribeiro
Affiliation:
São Carlos Engineering School - University of São Paulo, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, São Carlos, Brazil
H.D. Cerón-Muñoz*
Affiliation:
São Carlos Engineering School - University of São Paulo, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, São Carlos, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: hernan@sc.usp.br

Abstract

The wavy leading edge (WLE, also known as leading edge protuberances) is a passive flow control device inspired by the humpback whale pectoral flippers. It reduces the flow of three-dimensional effects on wings and increases their aerodynamic performance at high angles of attack. Despite the numerous studies on its aerodynamic benefits, research on its possible applications is still incipient. Therefore, this article addresses an evaluation of the WLE effects on the aerodynamic performance of a winglet. A rectangular wing, a base smooth leading edge winglet, and a winglet with WLE were designed and manufactured for CFD simulations and wind tunnel measurements. The winglet with WLE increased the maximum aerodynamic efficiency, i.e. this configuration reduced the induced drag by increasing wingtip vortex dissipation at a given angle-of-attack. Such results were used in re-evaluations of the aerodynamic performance of an original agricultural aircraft initially configured with a multi-winglet device. The winglet with WLE showed to be effective at increasing the aircraft operational time and range under a simulated actual condition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fish, F.E. and Battle, J.M. Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper, J. Morphol. 1995, 225, pp 5160, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052250105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, H., Hung, P., Jung, J. and Kim, M. Effect of the wavy leading edge on hydrodynamic characteristics for flow around low aspect ratio wing, Comput. & Fluids, 2011, 49, pp 276289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favier, J., Pinelli, A. and Piomelli, U. Control of the separated flow around an airfoil using a wavy leading edge inspired by humpback whale flippers, C. R. - Mec., 2012, 340, pp 107114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2011.11.004. Special issue: Biomimetic flow control.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johari, H., Henoch, C.W., Custodio, D. and Levshin, A. Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance, AIAA J., 2007, 45, pp 26342642, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skillen, A., Revell, A., Pinelli, A., Piomelli, U. and Favier, J. Flow over a wing with leading-edge undulations, AIAA J., 2014, 53, pp 464472, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopinathan, V. and Rose, J.B.R. Aerodynamics with state-of-the-art bioinspired technology: Tubercles of humpback whale, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 2021, 235, pp 23592377, https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100211001501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custodio, D., Henoch, C.W. and Johari, H. Aerodynamic characteristics of finite span wings with leading-edge protuberances, AIAA J. 2015, 53, pp 18781893, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklosovic, D., Murray, M., Howle, L. and Fish, F. Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (megaptera novaeangliae) flippers, Phys. Fluids, 2004, 16, pp L39L42, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklosovic, D.S., Murray, M.M. and Howle, L.E. Experimental evaluation of sinusoidal leading edges, J. Aircr., 2007, 44, pp 14041408, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, P.W., Howle, L.E., Murray, M.M. and Miklosovic, D.S. Computational evaluation of the performance of lifting surfaces with leading-edge protuberances, J. Aircr., 2011, 48, pp 591600, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dropkin, A., Custodio, D., Henoch, C. and Johari, H. Computation of flow field around an airfoil with leading-edge protuberances, J. Aircr., 2012, 49, pp 13451355, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmaeili, A., Delgado, H. and Sousa, J. Numerical simulations of low-reynolds-number flow past finite wings with leading-edge protuberances, J. Aircr., 2018, 55, pp 226238, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custodio, D. The effect of humpback whale-like leading edge protuberances on hydrofoil performance, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2007, 75.Google Scholar
Zhao, M., Zhao, Y. and Liu, Z. Dynamic mode decomposition analysis of flow characteristics of an airfoil with leading edge protuberances, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020, 98, p 105684, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K.L., Kelso, R.M. and Dally, B.B. Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles, AIAA J., 2011, 49, pp 185194, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, C., Zuo, Z., Morimoto, M., Maeda, T., Kamada, Y. and Liu, S. Two-step stall characteristic of an airfoil with a single leading-edge protuberance, AIAA J., 2018, 56, pp 6477, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malipeddi, A.K., Mahmoudnejad, N. and Hoffmann, K.A. Numerical analysis of effects of leading-edge protuberances on aircraft wing performance, J. Aircr., 2012, 49, pp 13361344, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., Qiao, W. and Wei, Z. Aerodynamic performance and wake development of airfoils with wavy leading edges, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2020, 106, p 106216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehraban, A., Djavareshkian, M., Sayegh, Y., Feshalami, B.F., Azargoon, Y., Zaree, A. and Hassanalian, M. Effects of smart flap on aerodynamic performance of sinusoidal leading-edge wings at low reynolds numbers, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 2021, 235, pp 439450, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410020946903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyhan, M., Sarioglu, M. and Akansu, Y.E. Influence of leading-edge tubercle with amplitude modulation on NACA 0015 airfoil, AIAA J., 2021, 59, pp 39653978, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzon, M.D., Kelso, R.M. and Arjomandi, M. Formation of vortices on a tubercled wing, and their effects on drag, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, 56, pp 4655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Paula, A.A., Rios Cruz, A.A., Ferreira, P.H., Kleine, V.G. and da Silva, R.G. Swept wing effects on wavy leading edge phenomena, In 2018 Flow Control Conference, pp 4253, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Z., Lian, L. and Zhong, Y. Enhancing the hydrodynamic performance of a tapered swept-back wing through leading-edge tubercles, Exp. Fluids, 2018, 59, p 103, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2557-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, M.L., Decker, R., Sapell, A.R. and Hart, J.S. Effect of bio-inspired sinusoidal leading-edges on wings, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, 81, pp 128140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, C., Katsiadramis, V. and Yakinthos, K. Influence of tubercles’ spanwise distribution on swept wings for unmanned aerial vehicles, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 2020, 235, pp 95103, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410020919583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Céron-Muñoz, H.D., Cosin, R., Coimbra, R.F.F., Correa, L.G.N. and Catalano, F.M. Experimental investigation of wing-tip devices on the reduction of induced drag, J. Aircr., 2013, 50, pp 441449, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Cerón-Muñoz, H.D., Daz-Vázquez, G. and Catalano, F.M. Conceptual design and CFD analysis of a new prototype of agricultural aircraft, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, 80, pp 156176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maughmer, M.D., Swan, T.S. and Willits, S.M. Design and testing of a winglet airfoil for low-speed aircraft, J. Aircr., 2002, 39, pp 654661, https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc (1992).Google Scholar
Roskam, J. Airplane design: Part I-VIII, DAR Corporation, Lawrence, KS, 2006.Google Scholar
Nicolai, L.M. and Carichner, G. Fundamentals of Aircraft and Airship Design, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001.Google Scholar
Ravelli, M.B., Zerbato, C., Oliveira, M.F.d. and Corrêa, R.d.G. Accidents involving specialized aircraft in agriculture aerial spraying, Ciência Rural, 2017, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Vaca-Rios, J.J., Diaz-Molina, A.I., Amaya-Ospina, M.A. and Cerón-Muñoz, H.D. Design and aerodynamic evaluation of a medium short takeoff and landing tactical transport aircraft, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 2022, 236, pp 825841, https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100211023627.Google Scholar
Garcia-Ribeiro, D., Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Ayala-Zuluaga, J.A., Martinez-Castañeda, D.F., Valbuena-Aguilera, J.S., Cerón-Muñoz, H.D. and Vaca-Rios, J.J. Drag reduction of a commercial bus with add-on aerodynamic devices, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. D: J. Autom. Eng., 2022, p. 09544070221098209, https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070221098209.Google Scholar
Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H. and Pope, A. Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
Steed, R. High lift CFD simulations with an SST-based predictive laminar to turbulent transition model, In 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2011-864.Google Scholar
Shi, W., Atlar, M., Norman, R., Aktas, B. and Turkmen, S. Numerical optimization and experimental validation for a tidal turbine blade with leading-edge tubercles, Renew. Energy, 2016, 96, pp 4255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsson, J. An Introduction to ANSYS Fluent 2020, SDC Publications, 2020.Google Scholar
Cai, C., Zuo, Z., Liu, S. and Wu, Y. Numerical investigations of hydrodynamic performance of hydrofoils with leading-edge protuberances, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2015, 7, p 1687814015592088, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015592088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Abdalla, A.M., Cerón-Muñoz, H.D. and Catalano, F.M. Integration assessment of conceptual design and intake aerodynamics of a non-conventional air-to-ground fighter aircraft, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2019, 86, pp 497519, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eguea, J.P., Bravo-Mosquera, P.D. and Catalano, F.M. Camber morphing winglet influence on aircraft drag breakdown and tip vortex structure, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2021, 119, p 107148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florez, J., Bravo-Mosquera, P.D., Garcia Ribeiro, D. and Cerón-Munoz, H.D. Performance effects of winglets with leading edge protuberances on a rectangular wing, In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, p. 0343, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0343.Google Scholar