Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T09:25:11.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the historical issues associated with achieving non-helicopter V/STOL capability and the search for the flying car

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

B. Saeed  and
G. B. Gratton
B. Saeed
Affiliation:
burhan.saeed@brunel.ac.uk, Brunel Flight Safety Laboratory, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
G. B. Gratton
Affiliation:
guy.gratton@brunel.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Combined Vertical and short take-off and landing, or ‘V/STOL’ capability has been of great demand and interest in the field of aeronautics since the creation of the aircraft. V/STOL capability is a targeted capability for many projected or prototype future aircraft. Past V/STOL aircraft are reviewed and analysed with regard to their performance parameters. This research has found two embedded categories in this class of aircraft based on their propulsion systems, i.e. jet and non-jet propulsion, and highlights the significant performance differences between them. In light of historical experience the performance of a relatively new class of aircraft, the flying cars, has been evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1152 , February 2010 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roberts, L. and Deckert, W.R., Recent progress in V/STOL technology. NASA Technical Memorandum 84238.Google Scholar
2. Tennekes, H., The Simple Science of Flight, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
3. Wanless, R.M., Can the Aldabra White-Throated Rail Dryolimnas Cuvieriald Abranus Fly? National Museum Of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC, USA, August 2003.Google Scholar
4. Alexander, D.E., Nature’s Flyers: Birds, Insects, and the Biomechanics of flight, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
5. Marden, J.H., Maximum Lift Production During Take-off In Animal Flying, Department of Zoology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
6. Abbott, I.H. and Doenhoff, A.V., Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, INC. New York, USA, 1959.Google Scholar
7. UK Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation Safety Review 2008, CAP 780 issued 11 November 2008.Google Scholar
8. Lindenbaum, B., V/STOL Concepts and Developed Aircraft Vol I – A Historical Report (1940 – 1986). Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, ADA175379.Google Scholar
9. McCormick, B.W., Aerodynamics of V/STOL Flight, Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar
10. Kuhn, R.E., Take-off and landing distance and power requirements of propeller-driven airplanes, IAS preprint 690, presented at Twenty-fifth Annual meeting, New York, USA, 28-31 January 1957.Google Scholar
11. Anderson, S.B., Historical Overview of V/STOL Aircraft Technology, NASA Technical Memorandum 81280.Google Scholar
12. Proceedings of V/STOL Aircraft Aerodynamics, Volume II. Naval Air Development Center, California, USA, 1979.Google Scholar
13. Filippone, A., Flight Performance of Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.Google Scholar
14. McLemore, H.C. and Smith, C.C., Generalised Hot-Gas Ingestion Investigation of Large-Scale Jet VTOL Fighter-Type Models, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA TN D-5581.Google Scholar
15. Raymer, D.P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 4th ed, AIAA Education Series, 2006.Google Scholar
16. Gologan, C., Broichhausen, K. and Seifert, J., A Calculation method for parametric design studies of V/STOL Aircraft. Aeronaut J, 2009, 113, (1143).Google Scholar
17. Stinton, D., The Design of the Aeroplane, 2nd ed, Blackwell Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar
18. Podcopter. www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/podcopter.html (Retrieved 20/08/09).Google Scholar
19. Terrafugia. www.terrafugia.com/index.html (Retrieved 20/08/09).Google Scholar
20. Aerocar. www.aerocarforsale.com/ (Retrieved 20/08/09).Google Scholar
21. MULE Stat Sheet, Urban Aeronautics. www.urbanaero.com (Retrieved 02/08/08).Google Scholar
22. X-Hawk Stat Sheet, Urban Aeronautics. www.urbanaero.com (Retrieved 01/02/09).Google Scholar
23. The New M400 Design, Moller International. www.moller.com (Retrieved 02/08/08).Google Scholar
24. Skyrider Specifications, Macro Industries Inc. www.macroindustries.com [Retrieved 22/07/08].Google Scholar
25. Dragonfly UMR1 Preliminary Specifications and Performance, Trek Aerospace. www.trekaero.com [Retrieved 01/08/08].Google Scholar
26. Moshier, M and Bulaga, R., Wind tunnel performance investigation of the SoloTrekTM XFVTM ducted fan system. DARPA/DSO, Arlington, VA, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
27. Clancy, L.J., Aerodynamics, Pitman Publishing Limited, London, UK, 1975.Google Scholar
28. Greco, C. and Paulo, S.J., Effect of wing sweep direction on suckdown for a hovering STOVL model. AIAA-1997-2315, 1997.Google Scholar
29. Turner, H.L. and Drinkwater, F.J., Some flight characteristics of a deflected slipstream V/STOL Aircraft. NASA TN D-1891, 1963.Google Scholar
30. Newman, S., The Foundations of Helicopter Flight, Butterworth Heinemann, 2003.Google Scholar
31. Proceedings of Special Course on V/STOL Aerodynamics. Advisory Group For Aerospace Reseach and Development, AGARD Report No. 710, 1984.Google Scholar
32. All The World’s Rotorcraft. www.aviastar.org (Retrieved 01/08/08).Google Scholar
33. Skyaid Organisation. www.skyaid.org (Retrieved 02/08/08).Google Scholar
34. Jet Engine Specification Database. www.jet-engine.net (Retrieved 01/07/08).Google Scholar
35. International V/STOL Historical Society. www.vstol.org (Retrieved 05/04/08).Google Scholar