Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T00:07:01.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The aerodynamic behaviour of fully inflated parachutes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. M. Ayres
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1971 The Royal Aeronautical Society's Handley Page Air Safety Award funded a preliminary study of the complex aerodynamic phenomena associated with fully deployed parachutes and results were sufficiently encouraging for the Ministry of Defence to sponsor a full research programme in the hope that a more rational approach to canopy design might evolve.

Preliminary investigations revealed that the essentially quasi-static two dimensional concepts of conventional aerodynamics as applied to aircraft were of limited value since a parachute is very much a three dimensional device which has a tendency to undergo large oscillations at relatively low descent airspeeds. The project therefore involved rethinking of basic aerodynamic principles and a return to hydrodynamic theory as applied to airships since they also have pronounced three dimensional anatomical characteristics and experience significant changes in relative air flow in their natural mode of operation. The objective of this paper is therefore to show how this same theoretical approach can be used as a basis for developing computer techniques capable of effectively simulating full scale parachute descent behaviour from basic wind tunnel test data.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 82 , Issue 805 , January 1978 , pp. 38 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1978 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Descent characteristics of parachutes by Henn. Translated by Erdelyi and Waltar. RAE Library Translation No 233, April 1948.Google Scholar
2. White, F. M. and Wolf, D. F. A theory of three dimensional parachute dynamic stability. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 5, pp 86–92, Jan-Feb 1968.Google Scholar
3. Simmond, , Gould, and Cowdrey, . Wind tunnel experiments on the squidding of parachutes. NPL Aerodynamic Department, Reports and Memoranda No 2523, 8th November 1943.Google Scholar
4. Buckingham, E. On physically similar systems: Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev, Vol 4, No 4, p 345, 1914.Google Scholar
5. US Air Force Parachute Handbook, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, ASD-TK-61-579, December 1963.Google Scholar
6. Hoerner, S. F. Fluid dynamic drag. Published by the author, 1965.Google Scholar
7. Heinrich, H. G. The effective porosity of ribbon grids. Zietshrift für Flugwissenshaften, Vol 14, Nos 11/12, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Cowley, W. L. and Levy, H. On the effect of acceleration on the resistance of a body. ARC Reports and Memoranda 612, May 1918.Google Scholar
9. Wallis, B. N. The application of the aerodynamic properties of three-dimensional bodies to the stabilisation and control of aerodynes. BAC Technical Report (un published), British Aircraft Corporation Ltd, Weybridge, Surrey.Google Scholar
10. Durand, W. F. (Editor). Aerodynamic theory, Vols I to VI. Dover Publications, New York, 1934.Google Scholar
11. Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press (6th edition), 1932.Google Scholar
12. Bisplinghoff, , Ashley, and Halfman, . Aero elasticity. Addison, Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massa chusetts, (2nd printing), November 1956.Google Scholar
13. Doherr, K. F. and Schmerwitz, D. Three component measurements for rigid parachute models. Symposium on parachutes and related technologies. Royal Aeronautical Society, London, September 1971.Google Scholar
14. Handbook of mathematical functions (Adams Bashforth Algorithm). Applied Mathematics Series 55, National Bureau of Standards, 1964.Google Scholar
15. Drake, V. N. Comparative ejection trials 1972 using aeroconical and 1-24 parachutes. A & AEE, Note 3137, MOD, 1973.Google Scholar