No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Applying heat pipes to a novel concept aero engine: Part 2 – Design of a heat-pipe heat exchanger for an intercooled-recuperated aero engine
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2016
Abstract
With the ever-increasing pressure for cleaner and more fuel efficient aero engines, gas turbine manufacturers are faced with a big challenge which they are bound to accept and act upon. The path from current high bypass ratio (BPR) engines to ultra high BPR engines via geared turbo fans will enable a significant reduction in SFC and CO2 emissions. However, in order to reach the emission levels set by the advisory council for aeronautics research in Europe (ACARE), the introduction of more complex cycles that can operate at higher thermal efficiencies is required. Studies have shown that one possibility of achieving higher core efficiencies and hence lower SFC is through the use of an intercooled recuperated (ICR) core. The concept engine, expected to enter into service around 2020, will make use of a conventional fin plate heat exchangers (HEX) for the intercooler and a tube type HEX as the recuperator. Although the introduction of these two components promises a significant reduction in SFC levels, they will give also rise to higher engine complexity, pressure losses and additional weight. Thus, the performance of the engine relies not only on the behaviour of the usual gas turbine components, but will be heavily dependent on the two heat exchangers. This paper seeks to introduce a heat pipe heat exchanger (HPHEX) as alternative designs for the intercooler and the recuperator. The proposed HPHEX designs for application in an ICR aero engine take advantage of the convenience of the geometry of miniature heat pipes to provide a reduction in pressure losses and weight when compared to conventional HEX. The proposed HPHEX intercooler design eliminates any ducting to and from the intercooler, offering up to 32% reduction in hot pressure losses, 34% reduction in cold pressure losses and over 41% reduction in intercooler weight. On the other hand the proposed HPHEX recuperator design can offer 6% improvement in performance, while offering 36% reduction in cold pressure losses, up to 80% reduction in hot pressure losses and over 31% reduction in weight. An ICR using HPHEX for the intercooler and recueprator may offer up to 2·5% increase in net thrust, while still offering 3% reduction in SFC and up to 7·7% reduction in NOX severity parameter, when compared to the ICR using conventional HEX.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011
References
1.
Andriani, R., Ferri, L., Ghezzi, U., Gamma, F.
Heat Recovery in Turbofan Engines: A Performance Analysis, 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE Joint Propulsion & Exhibit, 7-9 July 1997, Seattle, WA, USA.Google Scholar
2.
Andriani, R., Gamma, F., Ghezzi, U.
Regeneration in Propulsion, 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 1-3 July 1966, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.Google Scholar
4.
Boggia, S. and Rud, K.
Intercooled Recuperated Gas Turbine Engine Concept, 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 10-13 July, 2005, Tucson, USA.Google Scholar
5.
Hepperle, N.
Design of a Heat Exchanger for an Intercooled Recuperated Aero Engine, 2007, MSc Thesis, Cranfield University.Google Scholar
6.
Krammer, P., Rued, K. and Truebenbach, J.
Technology Preparation for Green Aero Engines, AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years, 14-17 July 2003, Dayton, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
8.
Lundbladh, A. and Sjunnesson, A.
Heat Exchanger weight and efficiency Impact on Jet Engine Transport Applications, 16th ISABE Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2003-1122.Google Scholar
9.
Marx, M.
Investigation and optimisation of Intercooling in an IRA Engine, MSc Thesis, 2007, Cranfield University, UK.Google Scholar
10.
McDonald, C. and Wilsont, D.G.
The utilization of recuperated engine cycles for high-efficiency gas turbines in the 21st century, Applied Thermal Engineering, 16, (8/9), pp 635–653.Google Scholar
11.
Rolt, A. and Baker, N.J. Intercooled Turbofan Engine Design and Technology Research in the EU, 2009, Rolls-Royce Plc Report.Google Scholar
12.
Saidi, A., Eriksson, D. and Sunden, B.
Analysis of Some Heat Exchanger Concepts for Use of Gas Turbine Intercoolers, Int J Heat Exchangers, 2002, 3, pp 241–260.Google Scholar
13.
Schoenenborn, H., Ebert, E., Simon, B. and Storm, P.
Thermomechanical design of a Heat Exchanger for a Recuperative Aeroengine, ASME, 2006, 128, pp 736–744.Google Scholar
14.
Scialo, S.
Performance Simulation and Investigation of an Intercooled Recuperated Aero Engine, MSc Thesis, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK, 2007.Google Scholar
15.
Wilfert, G., Kriegl, B. and Scheugenpflug, H.
CLEAN – Validation of High Efficient Low NOX core, a GTF High Speed Turbine and an Integration of a Recuperator in an Environmentally Friendly Engine Concept, 41st AIAA/ASME, SAE, ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 10-13 July 2005, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
16.
Wilfert, G., Sieber, J., Rolt, A., Baker, N., Touyeras, and A. Colantuoni, S.
New Environmental Friendly Aero Engine Core Concepts, 18th ISABE conference, Beijing, China, 2007-1122Google Scholar
17.
Whellens, M., Taguchi, H., Singh, R. and Pilidis, P.
Genetic Algorithm Based Optimisation of an Intercooled Recuperated Turbofan Design, 41st Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, 6-9 January 2003, Reno, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar