Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:20:42.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The literary theories of the three Yüan brothers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Chih-P'ing Chou
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

The Kung-an school of the late Ming derived its name from Kung-an hsien in Hupeh province, where the three Yüan brothers came from. The most active period of this school only lasted for about six years, from 1595 – when Yüan Hung-tao was appointed magistrate of Wu-hsien, Kiangsu province – until the death of Yüan Tsung-tao in 1600. Wu-hsien, at the heart of Soochow Prefecture, was the cultural center of the Yangtze valley. After serving as the magistrate of Wu-hsien for two years, during which time he resided in Soochow city, Yüan Hung-tao became disillusioned with bureaucratic life. Yet his tenure in office gave him a unique opportunity to share his ideas on literature with his friends in this area. Among them, Chiang Ying-k'o (1556–1605) and T'ao Wang-ling (1562–1609) were his two most enthusiastic supporters.

In 1598 Yüan Hung-tao joined his two brothers in Peking to accept a new appointment as an instructor in the Metropolitan Prefectural School (Ching-chao chiao-kuan). In the same year the Grape Society (P'u-t'ao she), a literary group led by the three Yüan brothers, was established at Ch'ung-kuo temple in the western suburbs of Peking. Its members included high officials and well-known scholars in the area around the capital. In addition to T'ao Wang-ling and Chiang Ying-k'o, Huang Hui (1554–1612), Hsieh Chao-che (1567–1624) and P'an Shih-tsao (chin-shih, 1583) comprised the central figures in this society. After the establishment of the Grape Society, the activities of the Kung-an school expanded until 1600, the year of Yüan Tsung-tao's death, and even though the active period of the Kung-an school was quite short, it nonetheless exerted a great influence on the development of late Ming literary criticism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×