Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T12:12:34.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2017

Wolfgang Müller
Wolfgang Müller
Affiliation:
Head of Unit, DG Trade H1, European Commission
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
A Commentary
 , pp. 707 - 712
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamantopoulos, K.; Pereyra, M. J. (2007). EU Anti-Subsidy Law and Practice, 2nd edition, London.Google Scholar
Ahn, D. (2011). United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China, WT/DS379/AB/R, 105:4 American Journal of International Law, available at papers.ssrn.com/sol/3/papers.cfm?abstract=1864025.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.; Husisian, G. (1996). The Subsidies Agreement, in Stewart, T. (ed.): The World Trade Organization: The Multilateral Framework for the 21st Century and U.S. Implementing Legislation, Chicago, IL, pp. 299–358.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. W.; Mavroidis, P. C. (2010). Too Much, Too Little … Too Late?, in Bagwell, K. W.; Bermann, G. A.; Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.): Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge, pp. 168–171.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. W.; Staiger, R. (2004). The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1988). Protectionism, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bohanes, J; Rueda Garcia, D. (2012/1). Case Note Part One: Appellate Body Report in United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) (DS353) (US – Boeing), 7:9 Global Trade and Customs Journal 365–378.Google Scholar
Bohanes, J; Rueda Garcia, D. (2012/2). ‘Automatic’ Discovery Procedures in the WTO: The Treatment of Annex V to the SCM Agreement by Appellate Body Report in United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) (DS353) (US – Boeing), 7:10 Global Trade and Customs Journal 441–446.Google Scholar
Bohanes, J; Rueda Garcia, D. (2012/3). Case Note Part One: Appellate Body Report in United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) (DS353) (US – Boeing), Part II – Serious Prejudice, 7:10 Global Trade and Customs Journal 396–405.Google Scholar
Brink, T. (2011). What Is a ‘Public Body’ for the Purposes of Determining a Subsidy after the Appellate Body Ruling in US – AD/CVD, 6:6 Global Trade and Customs Journal 313–315.Google Scholar
Cartland, M.; Depayre, G.; Woznowski, J. (2012). Is Something Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement? 46:5 Journal of World Trade 979–1016.Google Scholar
Caryl, B. B. (2011). Is China’s Currency Regime a Countervailable Subsidy? A Legal Analysis under the World Trade Organization’s SCM Agreement, 45:1 Journal of World Trade 187–219.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S.; Fischer, C. (2015). Canada – Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies, 14:2 World Trade Review 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, D. (2013). How Special Is the Special and Differential Treatment under the SCM Agreement? A Legal and Normative Analysis of WTO Subsidy Disciplines on Developing Countries, 12:1 World Trade Review 79–109.Google Scholar
Coppens, D. (2014). WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cosbey, A. (2013). Green Industrial Policy and the World Trading System, ENTWINED Issue Brief 17, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Cosbey, A.; Mavroidis, P. (2014). A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO, 17:1 Journal of International Economic Law 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depayre, G. (1995). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures after the Uruguay Round: An Overview, in Bourgois, J.; Berrod, F.; Gippini Fournier, E. (eds.): The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyers’ Perspective, Brussels, pp. 247–254.Google Scholar
Ding, R. (2014). ‘Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise, 48:1 Journal of World Trade 167–190.Google Scholar
Evaluation Study (2012). BKP Development Research & Consulting, Evaluation of the European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments, Volume 1: Main Report. Published on the website of the European Commission, DG Trade.Google Scholar
Farah, P. D.; Cima, E. (2015). WTO and Renewable Energy: Lessons from the Case Law, 49:6 Journal of World Trade 1103–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J. J. (2008). Inference for Econometric Modelling in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Investigations, 8:4 World Trade Review 545–557.Google Scholar
Flett, J. (2012). From Political Pre-occupation to Legitimate Rule against Market Partitioning: Export Subsidies in WTO Law after the Appellate Body Ruling in the Airbus Case, 7:2 Global Trade and Customs Journal 50–58.Google Scholar
François, J. (2010). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Determining the Benefit of Subsidies, in Bagwell, K. W.; Bermann, G. A.; Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.): Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge, pp. 103–115.Google Scholar
Goh, G.; Ziegler, A. R. (2003). Retrospective Remedies in the WTO after Automobile Leather, 6:3 Journal of International Economic Law 545–564.Google Scholar
Grané, P. (2001). Remedies under WTO Law, 4:4 Journal of International Economic Law 755–772.Google Scholar
Green, A; Trebilcock, M. (2010). The Enduring Problem of World Trade Organization Export Subsidies Rules, in Bagwell, K. W.; Bermann, G. A.; Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.): Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge, pp. 116–167.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M.; Mavroidis, P. C. (2003). US – Lead and Bismuth II: United States – Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Privatisation and the Injury Caused by Non-Recurring Subsidies?, 2:1 World Trade Review 170–200.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M.; Mavroidis, P. C. (2005/1). United States – Countervailing Duties on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany (WTO Doc. WT/DS213/AB/R): The Sounds of Silence, 4:1 World Trade Review 64–77.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M.; Mavroidis, P. C. (2005/2). United States – Countervailing Measures Concerning Certain Products from the European Communities (WTO Doc. WT/DS212/AB/R): Recurring Misunderstanding of Non-Recurring Subsidies, 4:1 World Trade Review 78–87.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.; Sykes, A. (2011). ‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO: A Commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration, 10:1 World Trade Review 133–164.Google Scholar
Guan, S. (2014). WTO Retaliation Rules in Subsidy-Related Cases: What Can We Learn from the US – Upland Cotton Arbitration?, 48:4 Journal of World Trade 815–842.Google Scholar
Hagemeyer, T. H. (2014). Tied Aid: Immunization for Export Subsidies against the Law of the WTO?, 48:2 Journal of World Trade 259–294.Google Scholar
Hahn, M.; Mehta, K. (2013). It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane: Some Remarks on the Airbus Appellate Body Report (EC and Certain Member States – Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/AB/R), 12:2 World Trade Review 139–161.Google Scholar
Henschke, L. (2012). Going It Alone on Climate Change. A New Challenge to WTO Subsidies Disciplines: Are Subsidies in Support of Emissions Reductions Schemes Permissible under the WTO, 11:1 World Trade Review 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestermeyer, H. P.; Nielsen, L. (2014). The Legality of Local Content Measures under WTO Law, 48:3 Journal of World Trade 553–592.Google Scholar
Horlick, G. N. (2013/1). An Annotated Explanation of Articles 1 and 2 of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, 8:9 Global Trade and Customs Journal 297–299.Google Scholar
Horlick, G. N. (2013/2). A Personal History of the WTO Subsidies Agreement, 47:2 Journal of World Trade 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H.; Mavroidis, P. C. (2005). United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What Is a Subsidy? 4:1 World Trade Review 220–247.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2010). Do the World Trade Organization Disciplines on Domestic Subsidies Make Sense? The Case for Legalizing Some Subsidies, in Bagwell, K. W.; Bermann, G. A.; Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.): Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge, pp. 85–102.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C. (2010). Tax Discipline in the WTO, 44:4 Journal of World Trade 763–777.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C.; Charnovitz, S.; Kim, J. (2009). Global Warming and the World Trading System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C.; Shelton-Erb, J. (1984). Subsidies in International Trade, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (2000). The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd edition, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Janow, M.; Staiger, R. (2003). US – Export Restraints – Measures Treating Export Restraints as Subsidies, 2:1 World Trade Review 201–235.Google Scholar
Janow, M.; Staiger, R. (2004). Canada – Dairy; Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk, 3:2 World Trade Review 277–315; reproduced from: The WTO Case Law of 2001, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies, Cambridge 2003.Google Scholar
Kang, S. (2006). Comment on Annex V of the WTO SCM Agreement Procedures in the Context of Korea – Shipbuilding Dispute, 33:2 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 183–197.Google Scholar
Kazeki, J. (2010). The ‘Middle Pillar’: Transparency and Surveillance of Subsidies in the SCM Committee: Reflections after the Global Economic Crisis, 5:5 Global Trade and Customs Journal 191–198.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. D. (2014/1). Market Economies and Concurrent Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Remedies, 17:1 Journal of International Economic Law 105–123.Google Scholar
Kelly, B. D. (2014/2). The Pass-Through of Subsidies to Price, 48:2 Journal of World Trade 295–322.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R.; Obstfeld, M.; Melitz, M. J. (2015). International Economics: Theory and Policy, 10th edition, Harlow.Google Scholar
Lima, A. de; Gaviria, J. A. (2012). A Case for Misaligned Currencies as Countervailable Subsidies, 46:5 Journal of World Trade 1017–1044.Google Scholar
Low, P.; Marceau, G.; Reinaud, J. (2012). The Interface between the Trade and Climate Change Regimes: Scoping the Issues, 46:3 Journal of World Trade 485–544.Google Scholar
Luengo, E. G. (2007). Regulation of Subsidies and State Aids and WTO and EC Law, Alphen aan den Rijn.Google Scholar
McDonough, P. J. (1999). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, in Stewart, T. P. (ed.): The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986–1994), Volume IV: The End Game (Part I), The Hague; London; Boston, MA, pp. 221–421.Google Scholar
Maruyama, W. H. (2011). Climate Change and the WTO: Cap and Trade versus Carbon Tax?, 45:4 Journal of World Trade 679–726.Google Scholar
Miranda, J. (2010). Causal Link and Non-attribution as Interpreted in WTO Trade Remedy Disputes, 44:4 Journal of World Trade 729–762.Google Scholar
Moulis, D.; O’Donnell, B. (2000). Case Comment: Does ‘Withdraw the Subsidy’ Mean ‘Repay the Subsidy’? The Implications of the Howe Leather Case for Firms in Receipt of Government Subsidies, 6:5 International Trade Law and Regulation.Google Scholar
Narayanan, P. (2004). Injury Investigations in ‘Material Retardation’ Antidumping Cases, 25:1 Northwest Journal of International Law & Business 37–68.Google Scholar
Neven, D.; Sykes, A. (2014). United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second complaint): Some Comments, 13:2 World Trade Review 281–298.Google Scholar
Paemen, H.; Bensch, A. (1995). From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community in the Uruguay Round, Leuven.Google Scholar
Pal, R. (2014). Has the Appellate Body’s Decision in Canada – Renewable Energy / Canada – Feed-in Tariff Program Opened the Door for Production Subsidies?, 17:1 Journal of International Economic Law 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2013). Treaty Interpretation or Activism? Comment on the AB Report on United States – ADs and CVDs on Certain Products from China, 12:2 World Trade Review 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piérola, F. (2013). The Question of the ‘Benefit’, 8:9 Global Trade and Customs Journal 293–296.Google Scholar
Poretti, P. (2009). The Regulation of Subsidies within the General Agreement on Trade in Services of the WTO: Problems and Prospects, Alphen aan den Rijn.Google Scholar
Prusa, T.; Vermulst, E. (2013). United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China: Passing the Buck on Pass-Through, 12:2 World Trade Review 197–234.Google Scholar
Prusa, T.; Vermulst, E. (2014). China – Definitive Countervailing Duties and Anti-Dumping Duties on Grain Oriented Flat-rolled Electrical Steel from the United States: Exporting US AD/CVD Methodologies through WTO Dispute Settlement?, 13:2 World Trade Review 229–266.Google Scholar
Prusa, T.; Vermulst, E. (2015). China – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Broiler Products from the United States: How the Chickens Came Home to Roost, 14:2 World Trade Review 287–335.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, A. (2015). To Cumulate or Not to Cumulate: That Is the Question, 10:9 Global Trade and Customs Journal 308–322.Google Scholar
Ramanujan, A.; Sampath, S. (2015). ‘Double Counting’: Is There Light at the End of the Tunnel?, 49:2 Journal of World Trade 223–252.Google Scholar
Rivers, R.; Greenwald, J. (1979). The Negotiation of a Code on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Bridging Fundamental Policy Differences, 11:3 Law and Policy in International Business 1447–1495.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, M. (1995). Die Kontrolle und Harmonisierung nationaler Beihilfen durch die Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2009). The Definition of Subsidy and State Aid, Oxford; New York.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2012). Ain’t Waistin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform, 15:2 Journal of International Economic Law 525–579.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2014). ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’: Lessons on Methodology in Legal Analysis from the Recent WTO Litigation on Renewable Energy Subsidies, 48:5 Journal of World Trade 895–938.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2015). ‘The Wide and the Narrow Gate’: Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement after the Canada-Renewable Energy/FIT Ruling, 14:2 World Trade Review 211–237.Google Scholar
Shadikhodjaev, S. (2012). How to Pass a Pass-Through Test: The Case of Input Subsidies, 15:2 Journal of International Economic Law 621–646.Google Scholar
Staiger, R.; Sykes, A. (2010). ‘Currency Manipulation’ and World Trade, 9:4 World Trade Review 583–627.Google Scholar
Steger, D. P. (2010). The Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement: Ahead of Its Time or Time for Reform, 44:4 Journal of World Trade 779–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, A. L. (2010). The Evolution of Subsidies Disciplines in GATT and the WTO, 44:4 Journal of World Trade 797–808.Google Scholar
Sun, Zesheng; Wang, Shuyun (2013). Revisiting the Economic Effect of Export Subsidy: An Expansion of the Traditional Analysis, 6:1 Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies 35–45.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. O. (2005). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, in Macrory, P. F. J.; Appleton, A. E.; Plummer, M. G. (eds.): The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, Volume 2, Heidelberg, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O. (2010). The Questionable Case for Subsidies Regulation: A Comparative Perspective, 2:2 Journal of Comparative Legal Analysis 473–523.Google Scholar
Thorstensen, V.; Müller, C.; Ramos, D. (2015). Exchange Rate Measures: Who Judges the Issue – IMF or WTO?, 18:1 Journal of International Economic Law 117–135.Google Scholar
Weber, R. H.; Koch, R. (2015). International Trade Law Challenges by Subsidies for Renewable Energy, 49:5 Journal of World Trade 757–780.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R.; Stoll, P.-W.; Koebele, M. (2008). WTO: Trade Remedies, Leiden; Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Wouters, J.; Coppens, C. (2010). An Overview of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Including a Discussion of the Agreement on Agriculture, in Bagwell, K. W.; Bermann, G. A.; Mavroidis, P. C.: Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge, pp. 7–84.Google Scholar
Yamaoka, T. (2013). Analysis of China’s Accession Commitments in the WTO: New Taxonomy of More and Less Stringent Commitments, and the Struggle for Mitigation by China, 47:1 Journal of World Trade 105–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Müller
  • Book: WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277549.044
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Müller
  • Book: WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277549.044
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Wolfgang Müller
  • Book: WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277549.044
Available formats
×