Book contents
- Women as Constitution-Makers
- Women as Constitution-Makers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Women’s Movements and the Recognition of Gender Equality in the Constitution-Making Process in Morocco and Tunisia (2011–2014)
- 2 Women and Constitution-Making in Post-Communist Romania*
- 3 Re-Living Yesterday’s Battles
- 4 Women’s Participation in Peace-Building and Constitution-Making in Somalia
- 5 Feminist Legalism
- 6 Women and Constitution-Making in Turkey
- 7 Egypt’s Tale of Two Constitutions
- 8 Dialogic Democracy, Feminist Theory and Women’s Participation in Constitution-Making
- Index
- References
8 - Dialogic Democracy, Feminist Theory and Women’s Participation in Constitution-Making
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2019
Book contents
- Women as Constitution-Makers
- Women as Constitution-Makers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Women’s Movements and the Recognition of Gender Equality in the Constitution-Making Process in Morocco and Tunisia (2011–2014)
- 2 Women and Constitution-Making in Post-Communist Romania*
- 3 Re-Living Yesterday’s Battles
- 4 Women’s Participation in Peace-Building and Constitution-Making in Somalia
- 5 Feminist Legalism
- 6 Women and Constitution-Making in Turkey
- 7 Egypt’s Tale of Two Constitutions
- 8 Dialogic Democracy, Feminist Theory and Women’s Participation in Constitution-Making
- Index
- References
Summary
Explores the history of women’s participation in constitution-making in Liberia, and outlines the strategies women have adopted to have their aspirations for constitutional equality heard. Written from the author’s experience as an advisor on constitutional amendment and constitutional reform processes in Liberia, the chapter reflects upon the lessons drawn from this experience for women’s engagement in constitution-making. It explains the importance of a ‘dialogic’ approach, in which all voices contribute to the ultimate outcome. This goal, Williams explains, not only requires the participation of women, it also requires explicit attention to designing the types of processes that will encourage openness in participation. These processes are contextualised in the history of Liberia, its complex ethnic, religious and social demographics, and its experience of conflict. The dialogic approach, it concludes, offers a hope of real participation for women in one of the most fundamental of social decisions: the adoption or amendment of a constitution.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Women as Constitution-MakersCase Studies from the New Democratic Era, pp. 351 - 377Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Banks, M., 2008, ‘Expanding Participation in Constitution Making: Challenges and Opportunities’, William & Mary Law Review 49, p. 1043.Google Scholar
Bauer, J., 2009, ‘Women and the 2005 Election in Liberia’, Journal of Modern African Studies 47, p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. and Tarule, J. M., 1987, Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., 1992, Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Psychology Press).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., 1996, ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton University Press), p. 67.Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. J., 1978, The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Coleman, F. V., 2009, ‘Gender equality and the rule of law in Liberia: Statutory law, customary law, and the status of women’, in Williams, S. H. (ed.), Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press), p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, J., 2014, ‘The Peril of Imposing the Rule of Law: Lessons from Liberia’, Minnesota Journal of International Law 23, p. 47.Google Scholar
Constitution of the Republic of Liberia Jan. 6, 1986, Chapter XII, Article 91, www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Liberia_1986.pdf?lang=en.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., 1992, ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 109.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Government of Liberia, National Review Report on Beijing +20, (2014), www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-documents/Beijing20/NationalReviews/natl_review_liberia_-_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Sirleaf, H. E. President Ellen Johnson, 2014, Annual Message to the Third Session of the 53rd National Legislature of the Republic of Liberia: Consolidating the Processes of Transformation 28 (27 January), www.emansion.gov.lr/doc/FINAL_ANNUAL_MESSAGE_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Heaner, G., 2008, ‘Religion, Law and Human Rights in Post-Conflict Liberia’, African Human Rights Law Journal 8, p. 458.Google Scholar
Held, V., 1990, ‘Mothering versus contract’, in Mansbridge, J. J. (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest (University of Chicago Press), p. 287.Google Scholar
Isser, D. H., Lubkemann, S. C. and N’Tow, S., 2009, ‘Looking for Justice: Liberian Experiences with and Perceptions of Local Justice Options’, a report by the United States Institute for Peace, (5 November), p. 4, www.usip.org/sites/default/files/PW63-Looking%20for%20Justice-Liberian%20Experiences%20with%20and%20Perceptions%20of%20Local%20Justice%20Options.pdf.Google Scholar
Letter from President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf to Hon. Armah Jallah, President Pro Tempore of the Liberian Senate, p. 7, Item 18 (describing the proposed amendment), https://governancecommissionlr.org/pg_img/President%20Sirleaf%20writes%20the%20Senate%20Commenting%20on%20the%20CRC%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
MacDougall, C. and Cooper, H., 2017, ‘George Weah Wins Liberia Election’, New York Times (28 December), www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/world/africa/george-weah-liberia-election.html.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., 1998, ‘Feminism and democracy’, in Phillips, A. (ed.), Feminism and Politics (Oxford University Press), p. 148.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., 2003, ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97, p. 515.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. and Warren, M., 2012, ‘A systemic approach to deliberative democracy’, in Parkinson, J. R. and Mansbridge, J. (eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge University Press), p. 1.Google Scholar
Outram, Q., 1999, ‘Liberia: Roots and Fruits of the Emergency’, Third World Quarterly 20, p. 163.Google Scholar
Sawyer, A., 2005, Beyond Plunder: Toward Democratic Governance in Liberia (Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers, Inc.).Google Scholar
Sengbeh, D. K., 2013, ‘UNFPA Leads War on Teenage Pregnancy in Liberia’, Sengbeh’s News Blog (12 July), https://sengbeh.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/unfpa-leads-war-on-teenage-pregnancy-in-liberia/.Google Scholar
Steady, F. C., 2011, Women and Leadership in West Africa: Mothering the Nation and Humanizing the State (New York: Palgrave MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Too Many, 2014, December, ‘FGM Let’s End It, Country Profile: FGM in Liberia’, www.refworld.org/pdfid/54bcdf574.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Mission in Liberia, 2008, September/October, ‘Research on Prevalence and Attitudes to Rape in Liberia, p. 7, www.stoprapenow.org/uploads/advocacyresources/1282163297.pdf.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., 2000, ‘Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation’, Political Theory 28, p. 758.Google Scholar
West, R., 2000, ‘The Difference in Women’s Hedonic Lives: A Phenomenological Critique of Feminist Legal Theory’, Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 15, p. 149.Google Scholar
Williams, M. S., 1998, Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, S. H., 2004, Truth, Autonomy, and Speech: Feminist Theory and the First Amendment (New York University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, 2009, ‘Equality, representation, and challenge to hierarchy: Justifying electoral quotas for women’, in Williams, S. H. (ed.), Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law (Cambridge University Press), p. 153.Google Scholar
‘Women in National Parliaments’, Interparliamentary Union, www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm (last updated 1 November 2018).Google Scholar
Young, M., 1997, Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar