Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: July 2020

1 - The Wicked Problem of Forest Policy

Summary

There is a global consensus that stopping deforestation is crucial for planetary health. Global efforts to curb deforestation, such as the Paris Agreement, the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD) programme, and the aspirational New York Declaration of Forests, involve significant international and cross-sectoral coordination. They also involve the creation of new institutions and governance mechanisms to accomplish the goals set out in these instruments. At the same time, national-level efforts to support human development, reflected in the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2016a, 2016b), aim to increase the welfare and wellbeing of populations living in poverty. Meeting these development goals will inevitably have cross-cutting effects on initiatives to address deforestation. In balancing these goals, policy-makers are confronted with wicked problems – or problems where there are moral considerations and where limited information is available for policy-makers. This book is focused on how wicked forest policy problems have been, and can be, addressed.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Allen, G. M. and Gould, E. M. Jr. 1986. Complexity, wickedness, and public forests. Journal of Forestry 84(4):2023.
Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D.. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 14(1):7398.
Ansell, C. and Gash, A.. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4):543571.
Arts, B. 2014. Assessing forest governance from a ‘Triple G’ perspective: government, governance, governmentality. Forest Policy and Economics 49:1722.
Arts, B. and Van Tatenhove, J.. 2004. Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences 37(3–4):339356.
Balint, P. J., Stewart, R. E., Desai, A. and Walters, L. C.. 2011. Wicked Environmental Problems: Managing Uncertainty and Conflict. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Buchanan, R. 1992. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2):521.
Carroll, M. S., Blatner, K. A., Cohn, P. J. and Morgan, T.. 2007. Managing fire danger in the forests of the US inland Northwest: a classic “wicked problem” in public land policy. Journal of Forestry 105(5):239244.
Cashore, B. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance 15(4):503529.
Cashore, B., Auld, G., Bernstein, S. and McDermott, C.. 2007. Can non-state governance ‘ratchet up’ global environmental standards? Lessons from the forest sector. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 16(2):158172.
Churchman, C. W. 1967. “Wicked problems”. Management Science 14(4):141142.
Cook, K. S. and Hegtvedt, K. A.. 1983. Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology 9(1):217241.
Coyne, R. 2005. Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies 26(1):517.
Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., McGivern, G., Dopson, S. and Bennett, C.. 2011. Public policy networks and ‘wicked problems’: a nascent solution? Public Administration 89(2):307324.
Filotas, E., Parrott, L., Burton, P. J., et al. 2014. Viewing forests through the lens of complex systems science. Ecosphere 5(1):123.
Forrester, J. W. 1987. Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review 3(2):136149.
Fung, A. 2015. Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review 75(4):513522.
Giessen, L., Burns, S., Sahide, M. A. K. and Wibowo, A.. 2016. From governance to government: the strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification. Policy and Society 35(1):7189.
Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gross, K. 2008. Framing persuasive appeals: episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology 29(2):169192.
Grint, K. 2008. Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: the role of leadership. Pages 169186 in Brookes, S. and Grint, K., editors. The New Public Leadership Challenge. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Grint, K. 2010. The cuckoo clock syndrome: addicted to command, allergic to leadership. European Management Journal 28:306313.
Guston, D. H. 2007. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Head, B. W. 2008. Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3(2):101118.
Head, B. and Alford, J.. 2008. Wicked problems: implications for policy and management. Presentation delivered to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 2008.
Head, B. W. and Alford, J.. 2015. Wicked problems: implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society 47(6):711739.
Head, B. W. and Xiang, W. N.. 2016. Why is an APT approach to wicked problems important? Landscape and Urban Planning 154:47.
Head, B. W., Ross, H. and Bellamy, J.. 2016. Managing wicked natural resource problems: the collaborative challenge at regional scales in Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 154:8192.
Howlett, M., Rayner, J. and Tollefson, C.. 2009. From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative. Forest Policy and Economics 11(5–6):383391.
Innes, J. E. and Booher, D.E.. 2016. Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems. Landscape and Urban Planning 154:810.
Juntti, M., Russel, D. and Turnpenny, J.. 2009. Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environmental Science & Policy 12(3):207215.
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E. and Griffith, R.. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources 23(10):9861001.
Lynn, L. E. Jr, Heinrich, C. J. and Hill, C. J.. 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
McDermott, C. L., Irland, L. C. and Pacheco, P.. 2015. Forest certification and legality initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon: lessons for effective and equitable forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 50:134142.
Messier, C., Puettmann, K., Chazdon, R., et al. 2015. From management to stewardship: viewing forests as complex adaptive systems in an uncertain world. Conservation Letters 8(5):368377.
Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344(6188):11181123.
Nikolakis, W. and Grafton, R. Q.. 2014. Fairness and justice in indigenous water allocations: insights from Northern Australia. Water Policy 16(S2):1935.
Nikolakis, W. and Hotte, N.. 2019. How law shapes collaborative forest governance: A focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. Society & Natural Resources, 33(1):4664.
Nikolakis, W. and Innes, J. L.. 2017. Evaluating incentive-based programs to support forest ecosystem services. Environmental Conservation 44(1):14.
Nikolakis, W., Akter, S. and Nelson, H. W.. 2016a. The effect of communication on individual preferences for common property resources: a case study from two Canadian First Nations. Land Use Policy 58:7082.
Nikolakis, W., Grafton, Q. and Nygaard, A.. 2016b. Indigenous communities and climate change: a Recognition, Empowerment and Devolution (RED) framework in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Journal of Water and Climate Change 7(1):169183.
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. 1999. Self-Governance and Forest Resources. Center for International Forestry (CIFOR), Occasional Paper No. 20. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94(2):251267.
Pülzl, H. and Rametsteiner, E.. 2002. Grounding international modes of governance into National Forest Programmes. Forest Policy and Economics 4(4):259268.
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies 44(4):652667.
Ringius, L., Torvanger, A. and Underdal, A.. 2002. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. International Environmental Agreements 2(1):122.
Rittel, H. W. and Webber, M. M.. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2):155169.
Roberts, N. 2000.Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review 1(1):119.
Sabatier, P. A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21(2–3):129168.
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., editors. 2014. Theories of the Policy Process. Colorado: Westview Press.
Satterfield, T. 2002. Anatomy of a Conflict: Identity, Knowledge and Emotion in Old-Growth Forests. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Senge, P. M. 1990. The leader's new work: building learning organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review 32(1):733.
Senge, P. M. and Sterman, J. D.. 1992. Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research 59(1):137150.
Sterman, J. D. 1994. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3):291330.
Stewart, J. 2009. Value conflict and policy change. Pages 3346 in Stewart, J., editor. Public Policy Values. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50(155):1728.
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G. and Stiller, S. J.. 2012. Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society 47(6):680710.
United Nations. 2016a. Sustainable Development Goals. New York City: United Nations. Available at: www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
United Nations. 2016b. Sustainable Development Goals, Biodiversity. New York City: United Nations. Available at: www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/biodiversity/
Waddock, S., Meszoely, G. M., Waddell, S. and Dentoni, D.. 2015. The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28(6):9931012.
Weber, E. P. and Khademian, A. M.. 2008. Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 68(2):334349.
Wexler, M. N. 2009. Exploring the moral dimension of wicked problems. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 29(9–10):531542.
Wondolleck, J. M. and Yaffee, S. L.. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.