Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:21:27.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

11 - Theory Can Heal: Constructing an Ethos of Intervention

from Part II - Doing Intersectionality

Jennifer Scuro
Affiliation:
College of New Rochelle in New York
Namita Goswami
Affiliation:
Indiana State University
Maeve M. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Notre Dame of Maryland University
Lisa Yount
Affiliation:
Savannah State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

I came to theory because I was hurting – the pain within me was so intense that I could not go on living. I came to theory desperate, wanting to comprehend –to grasp what was happening around and within me.

Once one acknowledges that where there are unequal distributions of social power, the distribution of credibility is likely to be distorted … This in turn enables one to identify a phenomenon of epistemic injustice which can arise from an unequal distribution of credibility … The remedy for this problem is not to remove barriers to women's knowledge, but to remove the barriers to credibility.

In ‘Feminism in Epistemology: Exclusion and Objectification’, Rae Langton describes the conditions by which women have suffered an epistemic injustice. According to Langton, this injustice is twofold insofar as it stems from two forms of denial of credibility: through omission, in which ‘women get left out’ and, more importantly, through commission, in that ‘women get hurt’ by failing to be ‘counted as knowers’. The commission of harm includes the ways in which ‘not counting’ also means not experiencing what it is to be counted – to be validated and treated as a credible participant in the work of knowledge generation. If, as Langton argues, the exclusion from knowledge generation is also a commission of harm against women, then future philosophy most urgently needs a revision in practice and disposition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Why Race and Gender Still Matter
An Intersectional Approach
, pp. 179 - 190
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×