Part I - The Concept of Information
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What is Quantum Information? , pp. 7 - 76Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Adriaans, P. (2013). “Information.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/information/.Google Scholar
Adriaans, P. and Van Benthem, J. (2008). Philosophy of Information (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 8). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. and Carnap, R. (1953). “Semantic Information.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4: 147–157.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. and Seligman, J. (1997). Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (1957). Information Theory and Its Engineering Applications. London: Pitman & Sons.Google Scholar
Brukner, Č. and Zeilinger, A. (2009). “Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities.” Foundations of Physics, 39: 677–689.Google Scholar
Bub, J. (2007). “Quantum Information and Computation.” Pp. 555–660 in Butterfield, J. and Earman, J. (eds.), Philosophy of Physics. Part B. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caves, C. M. and Fuchs, C. A. (1996). “Quantum Information: How Much Information in a State Vector?” In Mann, A. and Revzen, M. (eds.), The Dilemma of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen – 60 Years Later. Annals of the Israel Physical Society, 12: 226–257 (see also quant-ph/9601025).Google Scholar
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., and Schack, R. (2002). “Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation.” Journal of Mathematical Physics, 43: 4537–4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitin, G. (1966). “On the Length of Programs for Computing Binary Sequences.” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 13: 547–569.Google Scholar
Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. and Hayden, P. (2000). “Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1759–1774.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. M. (2001). “The Concept of Information and the Development of Modern Logic.” Pp. 423–427 in Stelzner, W. (ed.), Non-classical Approaches in the Transition from Traditional to Modern Logic. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duwell, A. (2003). “Quantum Information Does Not Exist.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34: 479–499.Google Scholar
Duwell, A. (2008). “Quantum Information Does Exist.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 195–216.Google Scholar
Fetzer, J. H. (2004). “Information: Does It Have to Be True?” Minds and Machines, 14: 223–229.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2004). “Outline of a Theory of Strongly Semantic Information.” Minds and Machines, 14: 197–222.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2005). “Is Information Meaningful Data?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70: 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2010). Information – A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2015). “Semantic Conceptions of Information.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/information-semantic/.Google Scholar
Hartley, R. (1928). “Transmission of Information.” Bell System Technical Journal, 7: 535–563.Google Scholar
Hoel, E., Albantakis, L., and Tononi, G. (2013). “Quantifying Causal Emergence Shows that Macro Can Beat Micro.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110: 19790–19795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingarden, R. (1976). “Quantum Information Theory.” Reports on Mathematical Physics, 10: 43–72.Google Scholar
Jozsa, R. (1998). “Entanglement and Quantum Computation.” Pp. 369–379 in Huggett, S., Mason, L., Tod, K. P., Tsou, S. T., and Woodhouse, N. M. J. (eds.), The Geometric Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozsa, R. (2004). “Illustrating the Concept of Quantum Information.” IBM Journal of Research and Development, 4: 79–85.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1965). “Three Approaches to the Quantitative Definition of Information.” Problems of Information Transmission, 1: 4–7.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1968). “Logical Basis for Information Theory and Probability Theory.” Transactions on Information Theory, 14: 662–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosso, P. (1989). Observability and Observation in Physical Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, R. (1996). “The Physical Nature of Information.” Physics Letters A, 217: 188–193.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. (2005). “Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information.” Synthese, 144: 23–39.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., and López, C. (2016). “Deflating the Deflationary View of Information.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 209–230.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, F., and Vanni, L. (2015). “A Pluralist View about Information.” Philosophy of Science, 82: 1248–1259.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016a). “What Is Quantum Information?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56: 17–26.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016b). “What Is Shannon Information?” Synthese, 193: 1983–2012.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1998). “Quantum Computation, Entanglement and State Reduction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 356: 1927–1939.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. (2014). “Substance.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/substance/.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A. and Piccinini, G. (2010). “Information without Truth.” Metaphilosophy, 41: 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, B. (1995). “Quantum Coding.” Physical Review A, 51: 2738–2747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Solomonoff, R. (1964). “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference.” Information and Control, 7: 1–22, 224–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe: An Exploration into Information Physics. New York-London: Springer.Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1996). “Information as a Basic Property of the Universe.” Biosystems, 38: 135–140.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2004). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. PhD diss., University of Oxford (arXiv: quant-ph/0412063).Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2006). “The Grammar of Teleportation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 587–621.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2008). “Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Information Theory.” Pp. 197–261 in Rickles, D. (ed.), The Ashgate Companion to the New Philosophy of Physics. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing (page numbers are taken from the online version: arXiv: quant-ph/0611187).Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2013). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, A. (1999). “A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics, 29: 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Barnum, H., Caves, C., Fuchs, C., Jozsa, R., and Schumacher, B. (1996). “Noncommuting Mixed States Cannot Be Broadcast.” Physical Review Letters, 76: 2818–2821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bub, J. (2007). “Quantum Information and Computation.” Pp. 555–660 in Butterfield, J. and Earman, J. (eds.), Philosophy of Physics. Part B. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Caves, C., Fuchs, C., and Schack, R. (2007). “Subjective Probability and Quantum Certainty.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38: 255–274.Google Scholar
Duwell, A. (2008). “Quantum Information Exists.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 195–216.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. I. G. (1997). “Models and Representation.” Philosophy of Science 64: S325–S336.Google Scholar
Popescu, S. and Rohrlich, D. (1994). “Quantum Nonlocality as an Axiom.” Foundations of Physics, 24: 379–385.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, L. (2011). Interpreting Quantum Theories: The Art of the Possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, M. (2004). “An Inferential Conception of Representation.” Philosophy of Science, 71: 767–779.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. G. (2004). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. PhD thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. G. (2008). “Quantum Bayesianism: A Study.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 579–609.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. G. (2013). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. (2008). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Adriaans, P. (2013). “Information.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/information/.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. and Carnap, R. (1953). “Semantic Information.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4: 147–157.Google Scholar
Brukner, Č. and Zeilinger, A. (2009). “Information Invariance and Quantum Probabilities.” Foundations of Physics, 39: 677–689.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2002). “Against Modularity, the Causal Markov Condition, and Any Link Between the Two: Comments on Hausman and Woodward.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53: 411–453.Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N. (1984). “Causes, Causity, and Energy.” Pp. 17–27 in French, P., Jr.Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Chaitin, G. (1966). “On the Length of Programs for Computing Binary Sequences.” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 13: 547–569.Google Scholar
Cook, T. and Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Cover, T. and Thomas, J. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. and Hayden, P. (2000). “Information Flow in Entangled Quantum Systems.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 456: 1759–1774.Google Scholar
Dowe, P. (1992). “Wesley Salmon’s Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory.” Philosophy of Science, 59: 195–216.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2001). “The Concept of Information and the Development of Modern Logic.” Pp. 423–427 in Stelzner, W. (ed.), Non-classical Approaches in the Transition from Traditional to Modern Logic. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duwell, A. (2008). “Quantum Information Does Exist.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 195–216.Google Scholar
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935). “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review, 47: 777–780.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (1925). “Theory of Statistical Estimation.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22: 700–725.Google Scholar
Frisch, M. (2014). Causal Reasoning in Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. and Woodward, J. (1999). “Independence, Invariance, and the Causal Markov Condition.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50: 521–583.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. and Woodward, J. (2004). “Modularity and the Causal Markov Condition: A Restatement.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55: 147–161.Google Scholar
Hiddleston, E. (2005). “Review of Making Things Happen. ” Philosophical Review, 114: 545–547.Google Scholar
Hoel, E., Albantakis, L., and Tononi, G. (2013). “Quantifying Causal Emergence Shows that Macro Can Beat Micro.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110: 19790–19795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holevo, A. (1973). “Information Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Measurement.” Problems of Information Transmission (USSR), 9: 177–183.Google Scholar
Jozsa, R. (1998). “Quantum Information and Its Properties.” Pp. 49–75 in Lo, H.-K., Popescu, S., and Spiller, T. (eds.), Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1965). “Three Approaches to the Quantitative Definition of Information.” Problems of Information Transmission, 1: 4–7.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. (1968). “Logical Basis for Information Theory and Probability Theory.” Transactions on Information Theory, 14: 662–664.Google Scholar
Landauer, R. (1996). “The Physical Nature of Information.” Physics Letters A, 217: 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, O. (2005). “Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information.” Synthese, 144: 23–39.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., and López, C. (2016). “Deflating the Deflationary View of Information.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6: 209–230.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Fortin, F., and Vanni, L. (2015). “A Pluralist View about Information.” Philosophy of Science, 82: 1248–1259.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016a). “What Is Quantum Information?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56: 17–26.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016b). “What Is Shannon Information?” Synthese, 193: 1983–2012.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. (1956). “Towards an Information-Flow Model of Human Behaviour.” British Journal of Psychology, 47: 30–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menzies, P. and Price, H. (1993). “Causation as a Secondary Quality.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44: 187–203.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1998). “Quantum Computation, Entanglement and State Reduction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 356: 1927–1939.Google Scholar
Price, H. (1991). “Agency and Probabilistic Causality.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42: 157–176.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational Quantum Mechanics.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35: 1637–1678.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Solomonoff, R. (1964). “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference.” Information and Control, 7: 1–22, 224–254.Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe: An Exploration into Information Physics. New York-London: Springer.Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1996). “Information as a Basic Property of the Universe.” Biosystems, 38: 135–140.Google Scholar
Suárez, M. (2013). “Interventions and Causality in Quantum Mechanics.” Erkenntnis, 78: 199–213.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2004). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. PhD diss., University of Oxford (quant-ph/0412063).Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2006). “The Grammar of Teleportation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57: 587–621.Google Scholar
Timpson, C. (2013). Quantum Information Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Von Wright, G. (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2007). “Causation with a Human Face.” Pp. 66–105 in Price, H. and Corry, R. (eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2013). “Causation and Manipulability.” Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/causation-mani/.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, A. (1999). “A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics, 29: 631–643.Google Scholar