Book contents
- The Well-Woman Visit
- The Well-Woman Visit
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Well-Woman Task Force
- Chapter 2 Rationale for the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 3 Principles of Early Diagnosis and Prevention
- Chapter 4 Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Promoting Lifestyle Modification and Behavior Change in the Context of Shared Decision-Making
- Chapter 6 Practical Aspects of the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 7 Considerations for Medically Underserved Populations
- Chapter 8 Paying for the Well-Woman Visit
- Section 2 Components of the Well-Woman Visit
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Principles of Early Diagnosis and Prevention
from Section 1 - General Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2017
Book contents
- The Well-Woman Visit
- The Well-Woman Visit
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 General Principles
- Chapter 1 The Well-Woman Task Force
- Chapter 2 Rationale for the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 3 Principles of Early Diagnosis and Prevention
- Chapter 4 Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Promoting Lifestyle Modification and Behavior Change in the Context of Shared Decision-Making
- Chapter 6 Practical Aspects of the Well-Woman Visit
- Chapter 7 Considerations for Medically Underserved Populations
- Chapter 8 Paying for the Well-Woman Visit
- Section 2 Components of the Well-Woman Visit
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Well-Woman Visit , pp. 18 - 30Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Wilson, J.M.G. and Jungner, G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. WHO Chronicle. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1968, 22(11):473. Public Health Papers, #34.Google Scholar
National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program: Cancer statistics. Available at: www.seer.cancer.gov. Retrieved August 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Jenabi, E. and Poorolajal, J. The effect of body mass index on endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis. Public Health. May 27, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.017 [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Tamoxifen and uterine cancer. Committee Opinion No. 601. Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 123:1394–7.Google Scholar
Wells, G.A., Cranney, A., Peterson, J. et al. Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, (1):CD001155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001155.pub2.Google Scholar
Taylor, F., Huffman, M.D., Macedo, A.F. et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, (1):CD004816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading causes of death. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm. Retrieved August 29, 2015.Google Scholar
Lindson-Hawley, N., Thompson, T.P., and Begh, R. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, (3):CD006936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub3.Google Scholar
Stead, L.F. and Lancaster, T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, (10):CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub2.Google Scholar
Smedslund, G., Berg, R.C., Hammerstrøm, K.T. et al. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, (5):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub2.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Preventing diarrhoea through better water, sanitation and hygiene: exposures and impacts in low- and middle-income countries. 2014. Available at: www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/gbd_poor_water/en/. Retrieved August 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What would happen if we stopped vaccinations? 2014. Available at: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/whatifstop.htm. Retrieved August 25, 2015.Google Scholar
Norton, M.E., Jacobsson, B., Swamy, G.K. et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med. 2015, 372(17):1589–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Committee Opinion No. 640. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:e31–7.Google Scholar
Humphrey, L.L., Helfand, M., Chan, B.K., and Woolf, S.H. Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 137:347–60.Google Scholar
Mayrand, M.H., Duarte-Franco, E., Rodrigues, I. et al.; Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Study Group. Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357(16):1579–88.Google Scholar
Gilbody, S., Sheldon, T., and House, A. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: A meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008, 178(8):997–1003.Google Scholar
Malkasian, G.D. Jr., Knapp, R.C., Lavin, P.T. et al. Preoperative evaluation of serum CA 125 levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with pelvic masses: Discrimination of benign from malignant disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988, 159(2):341–6.Google Scholar
Im, S.S., Gordon, A.N., Buttin, B.M. et al. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105(1):35–41.Google Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force. Carotid artery stenosis: Screening. July 2014. Available at: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/carotid-artery-stenosis-screening. Retrieved August 29, 2015.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for cervical cancer. Practice Bulletin No. 131. Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 120:1222–38.Google Scholar
Sasieni, P., Castanon, A., and Cuzick, J. Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: Population based case–control study of prospectively recorded data [published erratum appears in BMJ 2009;339: b3115]. BMJ. 2009, 339:b2968.Google Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Cervical cancer: Screening. March 2012. Available at: www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/cervical-cancer-screening. Retrieved September 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Sagara, Y., Mallory, M.A., Wong, S. et al. Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: A population-based cohort study. JAMA Surg. 2015, 150(8):739–45.Google Scholar
American Cancer Society. Breast cancer prevention and early detection. Available at: www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Retrieved May 10, 2016.Google Scholar
US Preventive Services Task Force. Breast cancer screening: Final recommendation statement. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/breast-cancer-screening1?ds=1&s=Breast cancer. Retrieved March 7, 2017.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Practice Bulletin No. 103. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 113:957–66.Google Scholar
Suggested Reading
Bhandari, M. and Guyatt, G.H. How to appraise a diagnostic test. World J Surg. 2005, 29(5):561–6.Google Scholar
Cox, B. and Sneyd, M.J. Bias in breast cancer research in the screening era. Breast. 2013, 22(6):1041–5.Google Scholar
Goetzinger, K.R. and Odibo, A.O. Statistical analysis and interpretation of prenatal diagnostic imaging studies, Part 1: Evaluating the efficiency of screening and diagnostic tests. J Ultrasound Med. 2011, 30(8):1121–7.Google Scholar
Grimes, D.A. and Schulz, K.F. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005, 365(9469):1500–5.Google Scholar
Iams, J.D., Romero, R., Culhane, J.F., and Goldenberg, R.L. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008, 371(9607):164–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed