American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Well-woman visit. Committee Opinion Number 534. Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 120:420–4.Google Scholar

Meddler, J.D., Kahn, N.B. Jr., and Susman, J.L. Risk factors and recommendations for 230 primary care adult patients, based on US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 1992, 8:150–3.Google Scholar

Holman, G.T., Beasley, J.W., Karsh, B.T. et al. The myth of standardized workflow in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015, September 2. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv107.Google Scholar

Wetterneck, T.B., Lapin, J.A., Krueger, D.J. et al. Development of a primary care physician task list to evaluate clinic visit workflow. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012, 21:47–53.Google Scholar

Yarnall, K.S.H., Pollak, K.I., Østbye, T., Krause, K.M., and Michener, J.L. Primary care: Is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003, 93:635–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carey, M., Noble, N., Mansfield, E. et al. The role of ehealth in optimizing preventive care in the primary care setting. J Med Internet Res. 2015, 17:e126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams, J. et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348:2635–45.Google Scholar

Anderson, L.M. and May, D.S. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the Unites States? Am J Public Health. 1995, 85:840–2.Google Scholar

Paul, C.L., Carey, M., Yoong, S.L. et al. Access to chronic disease care in general practice: The acceptability of implementing systematic waiting-room screening using computer-based patient-reported risk status. Br J Gen Pract. 2013, 63:e620–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruffin, M.T., Gorenflo, D.W., and Woodman, B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000, 13:1–10.Google Scholar

Pollak, K.I., Krause, K.M., Yarnall, K.S.H. et al. Estimated time spent on preventive services by primary care physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008, 8:245.Google Scholar

Sonntag, U., Henkel, J., Renneberg, B. et al. Counseling overweight patients: Analysis of preventive encounters in primary care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010, 22:486–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Available at: www.cdc.gov/brfss. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Cancer Council Australia. National Cancer Prevention Policy, 2007–2009. Cancer Council Australia, 2011. Available at: www.cancer.org/au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/NationalCancerPreventionPolicy/NCPP07-09breastcacner.pdf.Google Scholar

Burack, R.C. Barriers to clinical preventive medicine. Prim Care. 1989, 16:245–50.Google ScholarPubMed

Kottke, T.E., Brekke, M.L., and Solberg, L.I. Making “time” for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993, 68:785–91.Google Scholar

McPhee, S.J., Richard, S.J., and Solkowitz, S.N. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: Comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986, 1:275–81.Google Scholar

Spitz, M.R., Chamberlain, R.M., Sider, J.G., and Fueger, J.J. Cancer prevention practices among Texas primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ. 1992, 7:55–60.Google Scholar

Wender, R.C. Cancer screening and prevention in primary care. Obstacles for physicians. Cancer. 1993, 72(Suppl 3):1093–9.Google Scholar

Passey, M., Fanaian, M., Lyle, D., and Harris, M.F. Assessment and management of lifestyle risk factors in rural and urban general practices in Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2010, 16:81–6.Google Scholar

Ayres, C.G. and Griffith, H.M. Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive service guidelines. Am J Manag Care. 2007, 13:150–5.Google Scholar

Campion, E.W. A symptom of discontent. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344:223–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collins, K.S., Schoen, C., and Sandman, D.R. The Commonwealth Fund Survey of Physician Experiences with Managed Care. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund, 1997.Google Scholar

Hadley, J., Mitchell, J.M., Sulmasy, D.P., and Bloche, M.G. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians’ practice styles and satisfaction. Health Surv Res. 1999, 34:307–21.Google Scholar

Dennis, S., Williams, A., Taggart, J. et al. Which providers can bridge the health literacy gap in lifestyle risk factor modification education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Fam Pract, 2012, 13:44.Google Scholar

Zyzanski, S.J., Stange, K.C., Langa, D., and Flocke, S.A. Trade-offs in high-volume primary care practice. J Fam Pract. 1998, 46:397–402.Google Scholar

Yawn, B., Goodwin, M.A., Zyzanski, S.J., and Stange, K.C. Time use during acute and chronic illness visits to a family physician. Fam Pract. 2003, 20:474–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stange, K.C., Flocke, S.A., and Goodwin, M.A. Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers? J Fam Pract. 1998, 46:419–24.Google Scholar

Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., and Kawasumi, Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005, 112:505–16.Google Scholar

Mercer, S.W., Smith, S.M., Wyke, S., O’Dowd, T., and Watt, G.C. Multimorbidity in primary care: Developing the research agendas. Fam Pract. 2009, 26:79–80.Google Scholar

Uijen, A.A. and van de Lisdonk, E.H. Multimorbidity in primary care: Prevalence and trend over the past 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008, 14(Suppl 1):28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bower, P., Macdonald, W., Harkness, E. et al. Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: A qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2011, 28:579–87.Google Scholar

Tinetti, M.E., Bogardus, S.T. Jr., and Agostini, J.V. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351:2870–4.Google Scholar

Safford, M.M., Allison, J.J., and Kiefe, C.I. Patient complexity: More than comorbidity, the vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007, 22(Suppl 3):382–90.Google Scholar

Adeniji, C., Kenning, C., Coventry, P.A., and Bower, P. What are the core predictors of “hassles” among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015, 15:255.Google Scholar

Parchman, M.L., Noël, P.H., and Lee, S. Primary care attributes, health care system hassles, and chronic illness. Med Care. 2005, 43:1123–9.Google Scholar

Harrison, M.I., Koppel, R., and Bar-Lev, S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care – An interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007, 14:542–9.Google Scholar

Avitzur, O. In practice: The worst features of EHRs and how to fix them. Neurol Today. 2012, 12:22–7.Google Scholar

Shanafelt, T.D., Boone, S., Tan, L. et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172:1377–85.Google Scholar

Dyrbye, L.N. and Shanafelt, T.D. Physician burnout: A potential threat to successful health care reform. JAMA. 2011, 305:2009–10.Google Scholar

Okie, S. Innovation in primary care – Staying one step ahead of burnout. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359:2305–9.Google Scholar

Sinsky, C.A., Willard-Grace, R., Schutzbank, A.M. et al. In search of joy in practice; a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013, 11:272–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Altschuler, J., Margolius, D., Bodenheimer, T., and Grumbach, K. Estimating a reasonable patient panel size for primary care physicians with team-based task delegation. Ann Fam Med. 2012, 10:396–400.Google Scholar

Grumbach, K., and Bodenheimer, T. A primary care home for Americans; putting the house in order. JAMA. 2002, 288:889–93.Google Scholar

Rayburn, W.F. The Obstetrician-Gynecologists Workforce in the United States. Facts, Figures, and Implications – 2011. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2011.Google Scholar

Weinstein, L. and Wolfe, H.M. The downward spiral of physician satisfaction: An attempt to avert a crisis within the medical profession. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 109:1181–3.Google Scholar

Bettes, B.A., Chalas, E., Coleman, V.H., and Schulkin, J. Heavier workload, less personal control: Impact of delivery on obstetrician/gynecologists’ career satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 190:851–7.Google Scholar

Keeton, K., Fenner, D.E., Johnson, T.R., and Hayward, R.A. Predictors of physician career satisfaction, work–life balance, and burnout. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109:949–55.Google Scholar

Conry, J.A. and Brown, H. Executive Summary: Well-Woman Task Force. Components of the well-woman visit. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, J.F., Shaw, J.S., and Duncan, P.M., editors. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 3rd edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2008. pp. 203–19.Google Scholar

Tomsik, P.E., Witt, A.M., Raddock, M.L. et al. How well do physician and patient visit priorities align? J Fam Pract. 2014, 63:e8–e13.Google Scholar

Green, M. and Palfrey, J.S., editors. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 2nd edition. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2002.Google Scholar

Saini, S.D., van Hees, F., and Vijan, S. Smarter screening for cancer: Possibilities and challenges of personalization. JAMA. 2014, 312:2211–2.Google Scholar

Harris, R.P., Wilt, T.J., and Qaseem, A.; High Value Care Task Force of the American College of Physicians. A value framework for cancer screening: Advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015, 162:712–7.Google Scholar

Egnew, T.R; American Academy of Family Physicians. Agenda-Setting Algorithm. Available at: www.aafp.org/fpm/2014/0700/fpm20140700p25-rt1.pdf. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Electronic Preventive Services Selector (ePSS). Available at: epss.ahrq.gov/PDA/index.jsp. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., McGinnis, J.M. et al. Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2001, 21:10–9.Google Scholar

Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., Edwards, N.M. et al. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: Results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med, 2006, 31:52–61.Google Scholar

Sawaya, G.F. Re-envisioning the annual well-woman visit (editorial). Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:695–6.Google Scholar

Stange, K.C. and Woolf, S.H. Policy options in support of high-value preventive care. A prevention policy paper commissioned by the Partnership for Prevention. Partnership for Prevention, 2008. Available at: www.prevent.org/data/files/initiatives/policyoptionssupporthighvaluepreventivecare.pdf. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

American Academy of Family Physicians. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH). Available at: www.aafp.org/practice-management/transformation/pcmh.html. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Reid, R.J., Coleman, K., Johnson, E.A. et al. The Group Health medical home at year two: Cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010, 29:835–43.Google Scholar

American Medical Association. Steps Forward: Building an intensive primary care practice (online module). Available at: www.stepsforward.org/modules/intensive-primary-care. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Medical home answers to some questions. Available at: www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Practice-Management-and-Managed-Care/Medical-Home–Answers-to-Some-Questions. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG medical home toolkit. Available at: www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Practice-Management-and-Managed-Care/ACOG-Medical-Home-Toolkit. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Files, J.A., David, P.S., and Frey, K.A. The patient-centered medical home and preconception care: An opportunity for internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2008, 23:1518–20.Google Scholar

United States Congress. United States Senate Bill S. 1303 (111th): Women’s Medical Home Demonstration Act. Available at: www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/s1301. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Moore, G. and Showstack, J. Primary care medicine in crisis: Toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003, 138:244–7.Google Scholar

Whitcomb, M.E. and Cohen, J.J. The future of primary care medicine. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351:710–2.Google Scholar

Catling, C.J., Medley, N., Foureur, M. et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, (2):CD007622.Google Scholar

Smith, S.M., Soubhi, H., Fortin, M., Hudon, C., and O’Dowd, T. Managing patients with multimorbidity: Systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ. 2012, 345:e5205.Google Scholar

American Academy of Family Physicians. Family Practice Management: Practice Efficiency. Available at: www.aafp.org/fpm/topicModules/viewTopicModule.htm?topicModuleid=44. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Improving primacy care practice. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve.html. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Ghorob, A. and Brodenheimer, T. Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366:1955–7.Google Scholar

Salmoiraghi, A. and Hussain, S. A systematic review of the use of telepsychiatry in acute settings. J Psychiatr Pract. 2015, 21:389–93.Google Scholar

Pedone, C. and Lelli, D. Systematic review of telemonitoring in COPD: An update. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015, 83:476–84.Google ScholarPubMed

Bashshur, R.L., Shannon, G.W., Tejasvi, T., Kvedar, J.C., and Gates, M. The empirical foundations of teledermatology: A review of the research evidence. Telemed J E Health. 2015, 21:953–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, L.S. and Maeder, A.J. Recent directions in telemedicine: Review of trends in research and practice. Healthc Inform Res. 2015, 21:213–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bossen, A.L., Kim, H., Williams, K.N., Steinhoff, A.E., and Strieker, M. Emerging roles for telemedicine and smart technologies in dementia care. Smart Homecare Technol Telehealth. 2015, 3:49–57.Google Scholar

Downes, M.J., Mervin, M.C., Byrnes, J.M., and Scuffham, P.A. Telemedicine for general practice: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015, 4:134.Google Scholar

Ekeland, A.G., Bowes, A. and Flottorp, S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010, 79:736–71.Google Scholar

Coding resources. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Available at: www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Coding. Retrieved December 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Preventive services. Available at: www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/PreventiveServices.html. Retrieved February 5, 2016.Google Scholar