Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:27:21.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Closing the yield gap in the savannah zone

from Part III - Food production globally: in hotspot regions and in the landscape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Johan Rockström
Affiliation:
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Malin Falkenmark
Affiliation:
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Carl Folke
Affiliation:
Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Stockholm
Mats Lannerstad
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environment Institute
Jennie Barron
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environment Institute
Elin Enfors
Affiliation:
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Line Gordon
Affiliation:
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Jens Heinke
Affiliation:
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and International Livestock Research Institute
Holger Hoff
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environment Institute
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Affiliation:
Universität Osnabrück
Get access

Summary

This chapter takes a closer look at low-income countries in the savannah zone, where poverty and malnutrition are dominant features. Although high rainfall variability across time and space is a key challenge, this zone has substantial hydrological potential. The chapter analyses how investments in agricultural water management can contribute to closing the yield gap between actual and potential yields in the savannahs, and thereby to building resilience in these regions. The chapter discusses the range of technological, biophysical and social constraints currently limiting the uptake of these promising technologies. Conclusions are finally drawn regarding broad based farming system solutions that target the interacting constraints, and deal with the uncertainty of the future.

Challenges and opportunities in the savannah zone

This chapter examines the savannah zone, which presents an enormous development challenge but also a unique opportunity to improve food production and build social–ecological resilience. A major constraint on agro-ecological productivity across the world’s savannah regions is temporal shortages of water in the crop root zone. This chapter focuses on a set of small-scale practices that improve water management in agriculture to help overcome this constraint. If properly implemented and supported, these practices can unlock the agricultural potential of the savannah zone and provide a window of opportunity for improved livelihoods for millions of smallholder farmers across the world.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. and Narain, S. (1997). Dying Wisdom: State of India’s Environment. A Citizen’s Report. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
Alcamo, J., Flörke, M. and Märker, M. (2007). Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52, 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, J. (2009). Rainwater Harvesting: A Lifeline for Human Well-being. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
Barron, J. and Okwach, G. (2005). Runoff water harvesting for dry-spell mitigation in maize (Zea mays L.): results from on-farm research in semi-arid Kenya. Agricultural Water Management, 74, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boko, M., Niang, I., Nyong, A. et al. (2007). Africa. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, ed. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Van Der Linden, P. J. and Hanson, C. E.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 433–447.Google Scholar
Cavendish, W. (2000). Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28, 1979–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University (CIESIN) (2005). Poverty mapping project: global subnational prevalence of child malnutrition. Center for International Earth Science Information Network at Columbia University. Available at: (Accessed 29 March 2013).Google Scholar
Critchley, W., Negi, G. and Brommer, M. (2008). Local innovation in ‘green water’ management. In Conserving Land, Protecting Water, ed. Bossio, D. and Geheb, K.Wallingford: CABI, pp. 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnár, F. et al. (2008). Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Journal of Applied Geography, 28, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derpsch, R. (1998). Historical review of no-tillage cultivation of crops. In Conservation Tillage for Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings from an International Workshop, Harare, 22–27 June. Part II (Annexes), ed. Benites, J., Chuma, E., Fowler, R., Kienzle, J., Molapong, K., Manu, J., Nyagumbo, I., Steiner, K. and Van Veenhuizen, R.Eschborn: GTZ, pp. 205–218.Google Scholar
Derpsch, R. (2001). Conservation tillage, no tillage and related tecnologies. In 1st World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, vol. 1: Keynote Contributions, ed. Garcia-Torres, L., Benites, J. and Martinez-Vilela, A.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Djurfeldt, G., Holmen, H., Jirström, M. and Larsson, R. (2005). Addressing food crisis in Africa, What can sub-Saharan Africa learn from Asian experiences in addressing its food crisis? SIDA report: SIDA24308en. Department for Natural Resources and the Environment, SIDA, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Douxchamps, S., Ayantunde, A. and Barron, J. (2012). Evolution of agricultural water management in rainfed crop–livestock systems of the Volta basin. CGIAR Challenge Program for Water and Food Working Papers: 4. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi. Available at: .
Enfors, E. (2013). Social-ecological traps and transformations in dryland agro-ecosystems: Using water system innovations to change the trajectory of development. Global Environmental Change, 23, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfors, E., Barron, J., Makurira, H., Rockstrom, J. and Tumbo, S. (2011). Yield and soil system changes from conservation tillage in dryland farming: a case study from North Eastern Tanzania. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1687–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfors, E., Keys, P., Barron, J. and Gordon, L. (in preparation). Dryspell frequency and trends over time in semi-arid and dry sub-humid sub-Saharan Africa – implications for smallholder farmers.
Enfors, E. I. and Gordon, L. J. (2008). Dealing with drought: the challenge of using water system technologies to break dryland poverty traps. Global Environmental Change, 18, 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfors, E. I., Gordon, L. J., Peterson, G. D. and Bossio, D. (2008). Making investments in dryland development work: participatory scenario planning in the Makanya catchment, Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 13, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenmark, M., Fox, P., Persson, G. and Rockström, J. (2001). Water harvesting for upgrading of rainfed agriculture: problem analysis and research needs. SIWI Report: 11. Stockholm International Water Institute, Stockholm.
Falkenmark, M. and Rockström, J. (2004). Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Fischer, G., Hizsnyik, E., Prieler, S. and Wiberg, D. (2011). Scarcity and abundance of land resources: competing uses and the shrinking land resource base: SOLAW TR02. FAO SOLAW Background Thematic Report-TR02: 2. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Available at: .
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B. et al. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, P. and Rockström, J. (2003). Supplemental irrigation for dry-spell mitigation of rainfed agriculture in the Sahel. Agricultural Water Management, 61, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licker, R., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A. et al. (2010). Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F. M., Wu, Y. Q., Xiao, H. L. and Gao, Q. Z. (2005). Rainwater-harvesting agriculture and water-use efficiency in semi-arid regions in Gansu province, China. Outlook on Agriculture, 34, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabogunje, A. L. (2007). Tackling the African ‘poverty trap’: the Ijebu-Ode experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16781–16786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makurira, H., Savenije, H. H. G., Uhlenbrook, S., Rockström, J. and Senzanje, A. (2011). The effect of system innovations on water productivity in subsistence rainfed agricultural systems in semi-arid Tanzania. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1696–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malesu, M. M., Oduor, A. R. and Odhiambo, O. J. (eds) (2007). Green Water Management Handbook: Rainwater Harvesting for Agricultural Production and Ecological Sustainability. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF).Google Scholar
Mazvimavi, K. and Twomlow, S. (2009). Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 101, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrey, D. J. and Sally, H. (2008). Micro-agricultural water management technologies for food security in Southern Africa: part of the solution or a red herring? Water Policy, 10, 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimore, M. (2005). Dryland development: success stories from West Africa. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47, 8–21.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R. et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. and McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. N., Noble, A., Bossio, D. et al. (2006). Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 1114–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiang, Z., Yuanhong, L. and Gould, J. (2012). Every Last Drop: Rainwater Harvesting and Sustainable Technologies in Rural China. Rugby, UK: Practical Action.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. F., Smith, D. M. S., Lambin, E. F. et al. (2007). Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science, 316, 847–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J. (2003). Water for food and nature in drought-prone tropics: vapour shift in rain-fed agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 1997–2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Barron, J. and Fox, P. (2002). Rainwater management for increased productivity among small-holder farmers in drought prone environments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J. and De Rouw, A. (1997). Water, nutrients and slope position in on-farm pearl millet cultivation in the Sahel. Plant and Soil, 195, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J. and Falkenmark, M. (2000). Semiarid crop production from a hydrological perspective: gap between potential and actual yields. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19, 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Hatibu, N., Oweis, T. Y. and Wani, S. P. (2007). Managing water in rainfed agriculture. In Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, ed. Molden, D.London: Earthscan, pp. 315–352.Google Scholar
Rockström, J. and Karlberg, L. (2010). The quadruple squeeze: defining the safe operating space for freshwater use to achieve a triply green revolution in the Anthropocene. AMBIO, 39, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Kaumbutho, P., Mwalley, J. et al. (2009a). Conservation farming strategies in east and southern Africa: yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil and Tillage Research, 103, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K. et al. (2009b). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Röling, N. G. and Wagemakers, M. A. E. (eds) (1998). Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roudier, P., Sultan, B., Quirion, P. and Berg, A. (2011). The impact of future climate change on West African crop yields: what does the recent literature say? Global Environmental Change, 21, 1073–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreedevi, T. K. and Wani, S. P. (2009). Integrated farm management practices and upscaling the impact for increased productivity of rainfed systems. In Rainfed Agriculture: Unlocking the Potential, ed. Wani, S. P., Rockström, J. & Oweis, T.Wallingford: CABI, pp. 222–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M. and Gichuki, F. (1994). More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. (2011). Desertification: A Visual Synthesis. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification.Google Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2010). World Urbanization Prospects. The 2009 Revision. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: .Google Scholar
Wani, S. P., Rockström, J. and Oweis, T. (eds) (2009). Rainfed Agriculture: Unlocking the Potential. Wallingford, UK: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×