Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What defines ecosystem services-based approaches?
- Part I Addressing global challenges
- Part II Applying frameworks for water management and biodiversity conservation under an ecosystem services-based approach
- 6 Using ecosystem services-based approaches in Integrated Water Resources Management: perspectives from the developing world
- 7 Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add?
- 8 How useful to biodiversity conservation are ecosystem services-based approaches?
- Part III Assessing water ecosystem services
- Part IV Broadening the perspective
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
7 - Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add?
from Part II - Applying frameworks for water management and biodiversity conservation under an ecosystem services-based approach
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What defines ecosystem services-based approaches?
- Part I Addressing global challenges
- Part II Applying frameworks for water management and biodiversity conservation under an ecosystem services-based approach
- 6 Using ecosystem services-based approaches in Integrated Water Resources Management: perspectives from the developing world
- 7 Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add?
- 8 How useful to biodiversity conservation are ecosystem services-based approaches?
- Part III Assessing water ecosystem services
- Part IV Broadening the perspective
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
Summary
7.1 INTRODUCTION
The European Water Framework Directive (2000) provided a step-change in the way European waters are characterised, monitored, and managed. The Directive provides a framework to integrate multiple water environments and to coordinate a range of water-relevant legislation, while advocating for public participation and economic efficiency in water management. However, in the decade since the publication of the Directive, implementation has been problematic. As the Directive moves into its second implementation cycle, the European Commission and the member states are beginning to consider how it could be delivered using the concept of ecosystem services (Martin-Ortega 2012). Therefore, this chapter considers what an ecosystem services-based approach might add to the different stages required as part of the River Basin Management Planning process in Europe, and whether the approach might improve the implementation of the Water Framework Directive.
7.1 THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
7.2.1 Purpose
The objectives of the Water Framework Directive are to stop deterioration, improve the state of aquatic ecosystems, and promote the sustainable use of water by achieving ‘good ecological status’ in defined river basins (Box 7.1 collects the seven facts upon which the European Commission justifies and underpins the implementation of the Water Framework Directive). Under this norm, good ecological status is a composite assessment that measures the current state against the ‘reference condition’ for that type of water body (essentially, the state of the ecosystem before the impact of human pressures). Where the water body is at less than good status, measures (actions) must be taken. To achieve the good ecological status, cost-effective Programmes of Measures need to be set up. Where this is technically unfeasible or economically disproportionate then the objective can be reduced to moderate status or deferred to a later cycle (2021, 2027). Thus the plans provide an overview of the state of the ecosystem, the pressures on the ecosystem, and the actions that will be taken to remove the pressures and mitigate their impacts in an economically efficient way.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Water Ecosystem ServicesA Global Perspective, pp. 57 - 64Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
(2009). Between a rock and a hard place: incompatible objectives at the heart of river basin planning? Water Science and Technology 59(3), 425–431.Google Scholar
, , & (2012). Supply of an ecosystem service: farmers’ willingness to adopt riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Environmental Science and Policy 24, 101–109.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2011). Collective action for multi-scale environmental management: achieving landscape policy objectives through cooperation of local resource managers. Landscape and Urban Planning 103(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
, , & (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values, Ecological Economics 74, 8–18.Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). CBD Report of the Workshop on the Ecosystem Approach. UNEP/CBD/COP/4/Inf.9.
& (2012). Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: different paths to the same end? Journal of Environmental Management 109, 93–100.Google Scholar
& (2012). Public participation and water management in the European Union: experiences and lessons learned. In: (ed.), The Columbia River Treaty Revisited: Transboundary River Governance in the Face of Uncertainty. A Project of the Universities Consortium on Columbia River Governance. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
European Commission (2012). Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/Ec) River Basin Management Plans, European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/pdf/COM-2012–670_EN.pdf (last accessed 28 June 2013).
, , , et al. (2013). Dealing with future challenges: a social learning alliance in the Dutch water sector. Water Policy 15(2), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (2013). River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale. Journal of Environmental Management 126, 30–43.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1209–1218.Google Scholar
& (2013). The economic analysis in the implementation of the Water-Framework Directive in Spain. International Journal of River Basin Management 11(3), 301–310.Google Scholar
& (2009). Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. Nottingham University. Available at: www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem/pdf/JNCC_Review_Final_051109.pdf (last accessed 16 August 2012).
, , , et al. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment 408(19), 4007–4019.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2009). Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1).Google Scholar
& (2010). Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: evaluating the common wisdom. Resource and Energy Economics 32, 421–438.Google Scholar
& (2001). The EU water framework directive: measures and implications. Water Policy 3, 125–142.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(45), 18619–18624.Google Scholar
(2005). We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal 33(3), 459–481.Google Scholar
, , & (2011). The EU Water Framework Directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy 28(4), 712–722.Google Scholar
(2012). Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science and Policy 24, 83–91.Google Scholar
, , , , & (2014). The disproportionality principle in the WFD: how to actually apply it? In: , , , & (eds), Economics of Water Management in Agriculture. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken, NJ.
, , , et al. (2013). Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 561–571.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2012). Spatial Framework for Assessing Evidence Needs for Operational Ecosystem Approaches. JNCC-DEFRA, Peterborough. Available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-6241 (last accessed 12 May 2013).
& (2012). Institutional change in water management collaboration: implementing the European Water Framework Directive in the German Odra river basin. Water Policy 14(4), 625–646.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
(1992). Land, Water, and Development: River Basin Systems and their Sustainable Management. Routledge, London.
(2008). Land, Water and Development: Sustainable and Adaptive Management of Rivers. Routledge, London.
, , , et al. (2009). Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(6), 1139–1144.Google Scholar
& (2011). The attitudes of recreational user representatives to pollution reduction and the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 28(1), 167–174.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68(5), 1301–1315.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2011). Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(8), 1566–1581.Google Scholar
, , & (2010). Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: the example of the EU water framework directive. Ecological Economics 69(3), 502–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , & (2013). The role of map-based environmental information in supporting integration between river basin planning and spatial planning. Environmental Science and Policy 30, 81–89.Google Scholar
(2013). River Basin Network on Water Framework Directive and agriculture: practical experiences and knowledge exchange in support of the WFD implementation (2010–2012). Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Available at: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/28687/1/lb-na-25978-en-n.pdf (last accessed 21 September 2013).
& (2013). Optimising Water Framework Directive River Basin management Planning Using an Ecosystem Services Approach. Available at: www.crew.ac.uk/publications (last accessed 21 October 2014).
& (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory and Practice 10(3), 317–332.Google Scholar
& (2007). The European Water Framework Directive: how ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society 12(1): 25.Google Scholar
& (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environmental Science and Policy 13(8), 785–792.Google Scholar
, , , et al. (2010). The use of benthic indicators in Europe: from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60(12), 2187–2196.Google Scholar
., , , et al. (2014). The potential of using the ecosystem approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Science of the Total Environment 470–471, 648–694.Google Scholar
, , & (2009). Towards the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive? Lessons learned from water quality simulations in an agricultural watershed. Land Use Policy 26(3), 580–588.Google Scholar
& (2011). The impact of blue space on human health and well-being: Salutogenetic health effects of inland surface waters: a review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 214(6), 449–460.Google Scholar
, , & (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65(4), 834–852.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by