Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:18:46.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

12 - Common Ground in Sacred Nature: Unearthing Ecological Solidarity between Nasr and Ruether

from Part III - Angles on Ecofeminism

Sarah Elizabeth Robinson
Affiliation:
Claremont Graduate University
Emily Leah Silverman
Affiliation:
Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California
Dirk von der Horst
Affiliation:
Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, California
Whitney Bauman
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Get access

Summary

This essay unearths intertwined roots and shoots, background and content, in common ground between the Christian ecofeminist theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether and a scholar of Islam concerned with the environmental crisis, Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Despite their location in distinct fields of study, religious notions and intellectual priorities, these scholars share a commitment to generating wider recognition of nature's sacredness, as well as offering strong critiques of reductionist, colonizing forces that erode this perspective. For example, according to Nasr, the harmony of the natural world directs attention toward an awe-inspiring Divine Artisan; for Ruether, living nature is infused with and inseparable from divine presence.

Ruether and Nasr have been and continue to be critical, defining voices in the eco-conversation in their respective religious and academic circles. In Islamic studies, Nasr has been an environmental and philosophical voice from the 1960s to the present. Ruether's works are foundational to ecofeminism and feminist theology in and beyond Christianity. Nasr and Ruether navigate between scientific and religious discourse, inherited and renewed religious thought, and the potential for interreligious dialogue. Both critique science when it reduces living beings to their component parts and utilitarian value, and oppose certain oppressive conditions found in scientific modernism. Further, both Nasr and Ruether highlight historical and contemporary perspectives on the sacred dimension of nature and humanity, articulating distinct yet comparable visions of resacralization.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×