Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T03:03:11.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Politics and politeness in the reigns of Anne and the early Hanoverians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

J. G. A. Pocock
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Gordon J. Schochet
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Lois Schwoerer
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Nicholas Phillipson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

What Country soever in the Universe is to be understood by the Bee- Hive represented here, it is evident from what is said of the laws and Constitution of it, the Glory, Wealth, Power and Industry of its inhabitants, that it must be a large, rich and warlike Nation, that is happily govern'd by a limited Monarchy.

(B. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees, Or Private Vices, Public Benefits, The Preface)

The political thought of the reigns of Anne and of the first two Georges was an integral part of the political culture of a polity whose wealth was the product of a rapid if bumpy, expansion of overseas and domestic trade; whose power was derived from the wars of the reigns of William III and Anne and the massive extension of the fiscal and military power of the state that accompanied them, and whose civil and religious liberties were enshrined in ‘revolution principles’ whose meaning remained obscure and bitterly controversial. The Revolution, the Revolution Settlement, the Act of Settlement, and the Anglo-Scottish Union notwithstanding, the succession remained in question from the Revolution to the Forty-Five. Fundamental questions about the relationship of the monarch to parliament, parliament to people and the Church of England to a protestant nation deeply penetrated by dissent, remained unanswered and would continue to fracture the politics of a notoriously volatile political nation. For while it was an evident and, for some non-jurors, regrettable fact of political history that Britain had become a mixed monarchy, the question of whether the mixture was to be described in terms of the King's Answer to the Nineteen Propositions or in terms of contracts ancient or modern was profoundly controversial.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×