Book contents
- Variation, Versatility and Change in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Variation, Versatility and Change in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Sociolinguistic Fieldwork in a Racial and Political Maelstrom
- Chapter 2 Symbol of Powerlessness and Degeneracy, or Symbol of Solidarity and Truth?
- Chapter 3 “Me Tarzan, You Jane!”
- Chapter 4 The Haves and Have Nots
- Chapter 5 Connections between Sociolinguistics and Pidgin-Creole Studies
- Chapter 6 Implicational Scales
- Chapter 7 Variation and the Versatility Approach to Language Arts in Schools and Societies
- Chapter 8 Le Page’s Theoretical and Applied Legacy in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Chapter 9 The Social and the Linguistic in Sociolinguistic Variation
- Chapter 10 A Variationist Approach to Subject–Aux Question Inversion in Bajan and Other Caribbean Creole Englishes, AAVE and Appalachian
- Chapter 11 Situation
- Chapter 12 Language and Linguistics on Trial
- Chapter 13 The Continuing Need for New Approaches to Social Class Analysis in Sociolinguistics
- Chapter 14 Concord and Conflict in the Speech Community
- Chapter 15 The Joy of Sociolinguistic Fieldwork
- Afterword, with a Poem by Rachel Jeantel
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - Implicational Scales
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2019
Foreword by
Book contents
- Variation, Versatility and Change in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Variation, Versatility and Change in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Sociolinguistic Fieldwork in a Racial and Political Maelstrom
- Chapter 2 Symbol of Powerlessness and Degeneracy, or Symbol of Solidarity and Truth?
- Chapter 3 “Me Tarzan, You Jane!”
- Chapter 4 The Haves and Have Nots
- Chapter 5 Connections between Sociolinguistics and Pidgin-Creole Studies
- Chapter 6 Implicational Scales
- Chapter 7 Variation and the Versatility Approach to Language Arts in Schools and Societies
- Chapter 8 Le Page’s Theoretical and Applied Legacy in Sociolinguistics and Creole Studies
- Chapter 9 The Social and the Linguistic in Sociolinguistic Variation
- Chapter 10 A Variationist Approach to Subject–Aux Question Inversion in Bajan and Other Caribbean Creole Englishes, AAVE and Appalachian
- Chapter 11 Situation
- Chapter 12 Language and Linguistics on Trial
- Chapter 13 The Continuing Need for New Approaches to Social Class Analysis in Sociolinguistics
- Chapter 14 Concord and Conflict in the Speech Community
- Chapter 15 The Joy of Sociolinguistic Fieldwork
- Afterword, with a Poem by Rachel Jeantel
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Akers, Glenn. 1981. Phonological Variation in the Jamaican Continuum. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Albury, Donald H. 1973. The clause-internal sentence squish. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 69–82.Google Scholar
Alleyne, Mervyn. 1971. Acculturation and the cultural matrix of creolization. In Hymes, , ed., 169–86.Google Scholar
Allsopp, Richard. 1958, Pronominal Forms in the Dialect of English Used in Georgetown (British Guiana) and Its Environs by Persons Engaged in Non-Clerical Occupations. MA thesis, London University, vol. II.Google Scholar
Andersen, Roger W. 1978. An implicational model for second language research. Language Learning 28: 221–82.Google Scholar
Anshen, Frank. 1973. Some data which do not fit some models. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 62–8.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1969. Implicational scales in diachronic linguistics and dialectology. Working Papers in Linguistics 1.8, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1970. The integration of linguistic theory: Internal reconstruction and the comparative method. Working Papers in Linguistics 2.4, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973a. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973b. The patterning of linguistic variation. Varieties of Present-Day English, ed. by Bailey, R. and Robinson, J., 156–87. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger W., eds. 1973. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin, Marcowicz, Harry and Woodard, James. 1975. A good rule of thumb: Variable phonology in American sign language. In Fasold, and Shuy, , eds., 291–302.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 1999. The primacy of aspect hypothesis revisited: Evidence from language shift. Southwest Journal of Sociolinguistics 18.2: 1–22.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1971. Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7.4: 457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1973a. Quantitative versus dynamic paradigms: The case of Montreal que. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 23–43.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1973b. The structure of polylectal grammars. Report of the Twenty-Third Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, ed. by Shuy, Roger W., 17–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek and Odo, Carol. 1976. Change and Variation in Hawaiian English, vol. I. Honolulu, HI: Social Sciences and Linguistics Institute, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Chilton, Ronald J. 1969. A review and comparison of simple statistic tests for scalogram analysis. American Sociological Review 34: 238–45.Google Scholar
Day, Richard R. 1973. Patterns of variation in copula and tense in the Hawaiian post-creole continuum. Working Papers in Linguistics 5.2, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu. [Reprint of Day’s 1972 University of Hawai’i dissertation.]Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1971. Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hymes, , ed., 349–70.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1973. What do implicational scales imply? In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 141–8.Google Scholar
Elliot, D., Legum, S. and Thompson, S. A.. 1969. Syntactic variation as linguistic data. Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Binnick, R. et al., 52–9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 2008. Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18.1: 4–22.Google Scholar
Escure, Geneviève. 1982. Contrastive patterns of intragroup and intergroup interaction in the creole continuum of Belize. Language in Society 11: 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1970. Two models of socially significant linguistic variation. Language 46.3: 551–63.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1973. The concept of “earlier-later”: More or less correct. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 183–97.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1975. The Bailey wave model: A dynamic quantitative paradigm. In Fasold, and Shuy, , eds., 27–58.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1991. The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66.1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. and Shuy, Roger W., eds. 1975. Analyzing Variation in Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1979. Language Shift : Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, Elizabeth. 1978. Patterned phonetic variability in second language speech: A gradual diffusion model. Canadian Modern Language Review 34: 335–47.Google Scholar
Gorden, Raymond L. 1977. Unidimensional Scaling of Social Variables: Concepts and Procedures. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Green, Bert F. 1956. A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics. Psychometrika 21: 79–88.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guttman, Louis. 1944. A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review 9: 139–50.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. Locating Language in Time and Space, ed. by Labov, William, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G. and Norrby, C.. 2010. Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning 60.3: 628–50.Google Scholar
Hindle, Don and Sag, Ivan. 1975. Some more on anymore. In Fasold, and Shuy, , eds., 89–110.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. 1973. Aspects of Natural Generative Phonology. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell, ed. 1971. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. M. 1949. A simple and more rigorous technique for scale analysis. A Manual Of Scale Analysis, Part II. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1971. Methodology. A Survey of Linguistic Science, ed. by Dingwall, William O., 412–91. College Park, MD: Linguistics Program, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 340–73.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. 1980. Hugo Schuchardt’s creole studies and the problem of linguistic continua. Hugo Schuchardt. Schuchardt symposium 1977 in Graz, ed. by K. L. Lichem and H. J. Simon, 114–45.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leeman, Adrian, Kolly, Marie-José, Werlen, Iwar, Britain, David and Studer-Joho, Dieter. 2014. The diffusion of /l/ vocalization in Swiss German. Language Variation and Change 26: 191–218.Google Scholar
McIver, John and Carmines, Edward G.. 1981. Unidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1999. Accountability in descriptions of creoles. Creole Genesis, Attitudes and Discourse: Studies Celebrating Charlene J. Sato, ed. by Rickford, John R. and Romaine, Suzanne, 157–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Moisset, Christine and Sankoff, Gillian. 1996. On the acquisition of variable phonology in L2. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3.1: 111–26.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1977. Variations on relative clauses in Italian. In Fasold, and Shuy, , eds., 37–50.Google Scholar
Newman, Michael. 2010. Focusing, implicational scaling, and the dialect status of New York Latino English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14: 207–38.Google Scholar
Pavone, James. 1980. Implicational Scales and English Dialectology. PhD dissertation, Department of English, Indiana University. (Available from University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Dissn. #8020249.)Google Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred and Mackey, A.. 1993. An empirical study of children’s ESL development and rapid profile. ESL development: Language and Literacy in Schools, vol. 2, ed. by McKay, P., 115–259. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
Politzer, Robert L. 1976. The implicational relation paradigm in language acquisition. Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg, ed. by Juilland, Alphonse, 123–35. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1975. Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English BIN. In Fasold, and Shuy, , eds., 162–83.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1979. Variation in a Creole Continuum: Quantitative and Implicational Approaches. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1985. Ethnicity as a sociolinguistic boundary. American Speech 60.2: 99–125.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., ed. 1987a. Sociolinguistics and Pidgin-Creole Studies. (= International Journal of the Sociology of Language #71.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1987b. The haves and have nots: Sociolinguistic surveys and the assessment of speaker competence. Language in Society 16: 149–77.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1991. Variation theory: Implicational scaling and critical age limits in models of linguistic variation, acquisition and change. Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories, ed. by Huebner, Thom and Ferguson, Charles A., 225–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tim. 2017. Relativisation in the Writing of Swedish L2 Learners of English: A Corpus-Based Study. MA, English Language and Linguistics, Uppsala Universiteit. Available at https://tinyurl.com/y9lx4k5c.Google Scholar
Robson, Barbara. 1973. Pan-lectal grammars and adult language change. In Bailey and Shuy, eds., 164–70.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan. 1973. On the state of progress on progressives and statives. In Bailey and Shuy, eds., 83–95.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1973. Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, and Shuy, , eds., 44–61.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1974. A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel, 18–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman, Gatbonton, Elizabeth and Trofimovich, Pavel. 2009. Links between ethnolinguistic affiliation, self-related motivation, and second language fluency: Are they mediated by psycholinguistic variables? Motivation, Language Identity, and the L2 Self, ed. by Dörnyei, Zoltán and Ushioda, Ema, 172–92. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2005. Language transfer and discourse universals in Indian English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27.4: 535–66.Google Scholar
Stolz, Walter and Bills, G.. 1968. An Investigation of The Standard-Nonstandard Dimension of Central Texan English. Austin, TX: University of Texas Child Development Evaluation and Research Center.Google Scholar
Torgerson, Warren S. 1958. Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William. 1977. Constraining variation in decreolization. Language 53.2: 329–52.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. 1970. Two models of socially significant linguistic variation. Language 46.3: 551–63.Google Scholar
Woodward, James C. 1975. Variation in American sign-language syntax: Agent-beneficiary directionality. In Fasold and Shuy, eds., 303–11.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1980. Variation and change in the i ‘predicate marker’ of New Guinea Tok Pisin. Pacific Linguistics. Series A. Occasional Papers. Canberra, Issue 57 (Jan 1).Google Scholar