Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T04:32:11.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - How Much Should Highway Fuels Be Taxed?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Gilbert E. Metcalf
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United States imposes, at the federal and state levels, excise taxes of about 40 cents/gallon on gasoline and 45 cents/gallon on diesel for heavy trucks. The federal tax on these fuels is currently 18.4 and 24.4 cents/gallon, respectively (FHWA 2007, Tables 8.2.1 and 8.2.3). The U.S. tax rates are low by international standards; for example, in many European countries gasoline taxes exceed $2/gallon, although the United States is somewhat unusual in taxing diesel more heavily than gasoline, albeit only slightly (Figure 8.1).

Traditionally, the level of fuel taxes in the United States has been governed by highway spending needs; fuel tax revenues account for about two-thirds of the approximately $100 billion in revenues raised from all highway user fees. However, there is growing debate about both the appropriate level of federal fuel taxes and their status as a dedicated revenue source.

One reason is the weakening link between fuel taxes and highway spending. A rising portion of this spending has been financed through nonhighway revenues (e.g., local sales and property taxes), and some fuel tax revenues have been diverted for other purposes (e.g., transit projects). Moreover, there is concern about the erosion of real fuel tax revenues per vehicle mile, especially with the recent tightening of fuel economy regulations, and the failure of nominal tax rates to rise with inflation (federal gasoline and diesel taxes were last increased in 1993).

Type
Chapter
Information
US Energy Tax Policy , pp. 269 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blundell, Richard, and Macurdy, Thomas. 1999. Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In Handbook of Labor Economics, Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bordoff, Jason E., and Noel, Pascal J.. 2008. Pay-as-you-drive auto insurance: A simple way to reduce driving-related harms and increase equity. In The Hamilton Project. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
,Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2008. National Transportation Statistics 2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen P.A., and Huntington, Hillard G.. 2009. Reassessing the oil security premium. Working paper, Resources for the Future and Stanford University.Google Scholar
Calthrop, E., Borger, B., and Proost, S.. 2007. Externalities and partial tax reform: Does it make sense to tax road freight (but not passenger) transport? Journal of Regional Science 47:721–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Council of Economic Advisers. 2009. Economic Report to the President. Washington, D.C.: Council of Economic Advisors.Google Scholar
Cervero, R, and Hansen, M.. 2002. Induced travel demand and induced transport investment: A simultaneous equation analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36:469–490.Google Scholar
Dahl, Carol. 1993. A Survey of Energy Demand Elasticities in Support of the Development of the NEMS. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Diamond, Peter A., and Mirrlees, James. 1971. Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency and II: Tax rules. American Economic Review 61: 8–27, 261–278.Google Scholar
,Energy Information Administration. 1998. Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
,Federal Highway Administration. 2007. Highway Statistics 2007. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
,Federal Highway Administration. 2003. Highway Statistics 2003. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
,Federal Highway Administration, 2000. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
Fischer, Carolyn, and Newell, Richard G.. 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55:142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Carolyn, Harrington, Winston, and Parry, Ian W.H.. 2007. Should corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards be tightened? Energy Journal 28:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H. 1995. Environmental taxation and the ‘double dividend’: A reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance 2:157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H., and Schneider, Stephen H.. 1999. Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics 21:211–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Allen. 2009. Designing pay-per-mile auto insurance regulatory incentives. Transportation Research Part D 14:437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, Geoffrey. 2009. Climate economics: A meta-review and some suggestions for future research. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3:4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiby, Paul N. 2007. Estimating the energy security benefits of reduced U.S. Oil Imports. Oakridge National Laboratory, ORNL-TM-2007–028.
Li, Shanjun. 2009. Traffic safety and vehicle choice: Quantifying the effects of the arms race on American roads. Discussion Paper 09–33. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
,National Research Council. 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 2007. A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 45:686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 2008. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 2009. An analysis of Weitzman's Dismal Theorem. Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
,Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2009. Energy Prices and Taxes: Quarterly Statistics. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, First Quarter.
Parry, Ian W.H. 2002. Tax deductions and the marginal welfare cost of taxation. International Tax and Public Finance 9:531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ian W.H., 2008. How should heavy-duty trucks be taxed? Journal of Urban Economics 63:651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ian W.H., and Small, Kenneth A.. 2005. Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax? American Economic Review 95:1276–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ian W.H., Laxminarayan, Ramanan, and West, Sarah E.. 2009. Fiscal and externality rationales for alcohol taxes. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (Contributions) 9 (29): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, James M. 1991. Is the gasoline tax regressive? Tax Policy and the Economy 5: 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Georgina, and Fraser, Gordon. 2006. Road pricing: Lessons from London. Economic Policy 21:264–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, David, and Lomax, Timothy. 2009. The 2009 Urban Mobility Report. College Station, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A. 2009. Energy policies for passenger transportation: A comparison of costs and effectiveness. Working Paper, University of California, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., and Dender, Kurt. 2006. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. Energy Journal 28:25–52.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., and Verhoef, Erik. 2007. The economics of urban transportation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., and Winston, Clifford. 1999. The demand for transportation: Models and applications. In Transportation Policy and Economics: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer, Gómez-Ibáñez, J.A., Tye, W., and Winston, C. (eds.). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., Winston, Clifford, and Evans, Carol A.. 1989. Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Transportation Research Board. 2006. The fuel tax and alternatives for transportation funding. Special Report No. 285. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin, L. 2009. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 91:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Sarah, and Williams, Roberton C.. 2004. Estimates from a consumer demand system: Implications for the incidence of environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47:535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Sarah, and Williams, Roberton C.. 2007. Optimal taxation and cross-price effects on labor supply: Estimates of the optimal gas tax. Journal of Public Economics 91:593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Michelle. 2004. The “arms race” on American roads: The effect of SUV's and pickup trucks on traffic safety. Journal of Law and Economics 47:333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Roberton C. III. 2009. An estimate of the second-best optimal gasoline tax considering both efficiency and equity. Working Paper, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×