Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:49:32.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The anthropic landscape of string theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Leonard Susskind
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Bernard Carr
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

The landscape

The world-view shared by most physicists is that the laws of nature are uniquely described by some special action principle that completely determines the vacuum, the spectrum of elementary particles, the forces and the symmetries. Experience with quantum electrodynamics and quantum chromodynamics suggests a world with a small number of parameters and a unique ground state. For the most part, string theorists bought into this paradigm. At first, it was hoped that string theory would be unique and explain the various parameters that quantum field theory left unexplained. When this turned out to be false, the belief developed that there were exactly five string theories with names like ‘type 2a’ and ‘heterotic’. This also turned out to be wrong. Instead, a continuum of theories were discovered that smoothly interpolated between the five and also included a theory called ‘M-theory’. The language changed a little. One no longer spoke of different theories, but rather of different solutions of some master theory.

The space of these solutions is called the ‘moduli space of supersymmetric vacua’. I will call it the ‘supermoduli-space’. Moving around on this supermoduli-space is accomplished by varying certain dynamical ‘moduli’. Examples of moduli are the size and shape parameters of the compact internal space that 4-dimensional string theory always needs. These moduli are not parameters in the theory, but are more like fields. As you move around in ordinary space, the moduli can vary and have their own equations of motion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] R., Bousso and J., Polchinski. Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. JHEP, 0006 (2000), 006 [hep-th/0004134].Google Scholar
[2] S., Kachru, R., Kallosh, A., Linde and S. P., Trivedi. de Sitter vacua in string theory. Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), 046005 [hep-th/0301240].Google Scholar
[3] J. D., Brown and C., Teitelboim. Neutralization of the cosmological constant by membrane creation. Nucl. Phys. B 297 (1988), 787.Google Scholar
[4] N., Goheer, M., Kleban and L., Susskind. The trouble with de Sitter space. JHEP, 0307 (2003), 056 [hep-th/0212209].Google Scholar
[5] L., Dyson, J., Lindesay and L., Susskind. Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?JHEP 0208 (2002), 045 [hep-th/0202163].Google Scholar
[6] L., Dyson, M., Kleban and L., Susskind. Disturbing implications of a cosmological constant. JHEP, 0210 (2002), 011 [hep-th/0208013].Google Scholar
[7] L., Susskind, L., Thorlacius and J., Uglum. The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity. Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993), 3743 [hep-th/9306069].Google Scholar
[8] C. R., Stephens, G., 't Hooft and B. F., Whiting. Black hole evaporation without information loss. Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994), 621 [gr-qc/9310006].Google Scholar
[9] M., Dine and N., Seiberg. Comments on higher derivative operators in some SUSY field theories. Phys. Lett. B 409 (1997), 239.Google Scholar
[10] A. D., Linde. Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary universe. Phys. Lett. B 175 (1986), 395.Google Scholar
[11] G., 't Hooft. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. In Salamfest 1993 (1993), pp. 284–96 [gr-qc/9310026].Google Scholar
[12] L., Susskind. The world as a hologram. J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995), 6377 [hep-th/9409089].Google Scholar
[13] L., Susskind. Twenty years of debate with Stephen. In The Future of Theoretical Physics, eds. G. W., Gibbons, E. P. S., Shellard and S. J., Ranken (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 330–47 [hep-th/0204027].Google Scholar
[14] J. M., Maldacena. Eternal black holes in AdS. JHEP, 0304 (2001), 021 [hep-th/0106112].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×