Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T09:52:45.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The GMB: merger and financial reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

Paul Willman
Affiliation:
London Business School
Tim Morris
Affiliation:
London Business School
Beverly Aston
Affiliation:
London Business School
Get access

Summary

Historical background

GMB is currently the second largest union in the UK, following the merger between GMBATU and APEX in 1989. GMBATU itself was a relatively new creation, following from the merger between GMWU and the Boilermakers' union in 1982, but both unions had a much longer history. The numerically larger GMWU was founded by merger of three municipal and labouring unions in 1924, but its roots go back to the gasworkers' militancy of the 1880s. In the post-war period, GMWU membership has been concentrated in six sectors; namely, engineering, food drink and tobacco, gas, chemicals, electricity, and local authority employment. However, it also has members in the NHS, in the water industry, in textiles and, more recently, in catering and distribution. It is strongest in the north-east and north-west.

GMB competes with a wide range of both public- and private-sector unions but most notably with the Transport and General Workers' Union (T&G). The older GMWU differed in a number of respects from T&G, most notably in its attitude towards shop stewards and industrial action. During the 1960s, when T&G were decentralising activities towards shop stewards, GMWU was involved in a number of conflicts over steward independence, most notably at Ford and Pilkingtons (Eaton and Gill, 1983: 317). At the time the union had a rather staid, right-wing image and remained highly centralised.

Unlike T&G, GMWU was relatively unattractive as a merger partner, in part because of its image but more because of its strong regional structure. It was, in Undy et al.'s terms ‘restrictive-passive’ in its orientation to growth, compared with the ‘positive-expansionist’ approach of T&G.

Type
Chapter
Information
Union Business
Trade Union Organisation and Financial Reform in the Thatcher Years
, pp. 140 - 153
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×