Book contents
- Understanding Economic Change
- Understanding Economic Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual and Methodological Problems
- Part III Perspectives on Evolutionary Macroeconomics
- Part IV Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution
- 7 Democracy, Rationality and Religion
- 8 On the Evolution of Organisational Governance
- 9 Strategic Interaction and Externalities
- 10 Fairness in Urban Land Use
- Part V Evolutionary Perspectives on Welfare and Sustainability
- Index
- References
7 - Democracy, Rationality and Religion
from Part IV - Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2018
Book contents
- Understanding Economic Change
- Understanding Economic Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual and Methodological Problems
- Part III Perspectives on Evolutionary Macroeconomics
- Part IV Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution
- 7 Democracy, Rationality and Religion
- 8 On the Evolution of Organisational Governance
- 9 Strategic Interaction and Externalities
- 10 Fairness in Urban Land Use
- Part V Evolutionary Perspectives on Welfare and Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Understanding Economic ChangeAdvances in Evolutionary Economics, pp. 215 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1982. Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Catania, A. C. and Harnad, S. 1988. The Selection of Behavior: The Operant Behaviorism of B.F. Skinner: Comments and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Commager, H. S. 1978. The Empire of Reason: How Europe Imagined and America Realized the Enlightenment. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, A. [1840] 1945. Democracy in America, Vol. 2. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Economist. 2006. Islam, America and Europe. Economist [Online]. Available: www.economist.com/node/7081343Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., Hébert, Robert F., Tollison, R. D., Anderson, G. M., and Davidson, A. B. 1997. Sacred Trust: The Medieval Church as an Economic Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ensminger, Jeseses. 1997. Transaction Costs and Islam: Explaining Conversion in Africa. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 4–29.Google Scholar
Farrar, C. 1992. Ancient Greek Political Theory as a Response to Democracy. In: Dunn, J. (ed.) Democracy: The Unfinished Journey 508 BC to 1993 AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Armesto, F. 2004. So You Think You’re Human? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. 1997. The History of Government, vols. I, II, and III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. 1968. The Venetian Constitution in Florentine Political Thought. In: Rubinstein, N. (ed.) Florentine Studies: Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Gleeson-White, J. 2011. Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Created Modern Finance. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1982. Tradition and Modernity Revisited. In: Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1742] 1987. Essays, Moral, Political and Literary. Indiannapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1795. Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf (Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch), Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Klosko, G. 2000. Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. 1995. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In: Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. 1975. On the Origins of Language: An Introduction to the Evolution of Human Speech. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macdowell, D. M. 1978. The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martines, L. 1988. Power and Imagination: City-States in Renaissance Italy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., et al. 2014. The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–65.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 137–158.Google Scholar
Pugla, D. and Trefler, D. 2014. International Trade and Institutional Change: Medieval Venice’s Response to Globalization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 753–821.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. 1990. Visual Perception in People and Machines. In: Blake, A. and Troscianko, T. (eds.) AI and the Eye. Chichister, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. 1983. Adaptive Behavior and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Thucydides, 1943. The History of the Peloponnesian War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. [1896] 1967. A New Principle of Just Taxation, Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Jena: Fischer, English translation. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T. eds. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 72–118.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. 1997. Group Choice and Individual Judgments. In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar